IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2610.14584.html

Tail Instability and Scale Control in Conditional Normalizing Flows for Treasury Yield-Curve Scenarios

Author

Listed:
  • Arin Mohanty

Abstract

A conditional normalizing flow can produce extreme scenarios even when its point forecasts appear reasonable. We compare two fitted models for daily Treasury yield changes at eleven maturities reconstructed from Federal Reserve curve parameters. Both use an LSTM, an auxiliary location head, and an affine residual flow. On a previously unused 60-date window, the frozen Student-t model generated an absolute standardized coordinate of 34.3 million. A Gaussian-base model with tighter coupling scale control reached 14.72. Each generated 600,000 vectors. The original model's scenario-mean MSE was 33,908.95, while its location-head MSE was 0.3376. The stabilized model's two estimates remained close. Across five development windows, the stabilized maximum was 17.33 among three million vectors. Stability did not imply better prediction: historical simulation had better distributional scores and coverage closer to nominal on the new window. The original flow also had a better log score despite its extreme samples. Frozen-model evaluation is reproducible, but the comparison does not isolate architectural effects or establish a general forecasting advantage.

Suggested Citation

  • Arin Mohanty, 2026. "Tail Instability and Scale Control in Conditional Normalizing Flows for Treasury Yield-Curve Scenarios," Papers 2610.14584, arXiv.org.
    • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2610.14584
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2610.14584
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Paul H. Kupiec, 1995. "Techniques for verifying the accuracy of risk measurement models," Finance and Economics Discussion Series 95-24, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (U.S.).
    2. Gneiting, Tilmann & Raftery, Adrian E., 2007. "Strictly Proper Scoring Rules, Prediction, and Estimation," Journal of the American Statistical Association, American Statistical Association, vol. 102, pages 359-378, March.
    3. McNeil, Alexander J. & Frey, Rudiger, 2000. "Estimation of tail-related risk measures for heteroscedastic financial time series: an extreme value approach," Journal of Empirical Finance, Elsevier, vol. 7(3-4), pages 271-300, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhanyi Jiao & Qiuqi Wang & Yimiao Zhao, 2025. "Comparative e-backtests for general risk measures," Papers 2511.05840, arXiv.org, revised Mar 2026.
    2. Vica Tendenan & Richard Gerlach & Chao Wang, 2020. "Tail risk forecasting using Bayesian realized EGARCH models," Papers 2008.05147, arXiv.org, revised Aug 2020.
    3. Wang, Shuai & Wang, Qian & Lu, Helen & Zhang, Dongxue & Xing, Qianyi & Wang, Jianzhou, 2025. "Learning about tail risk: Machine learning and combination with regularization in market risk management," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 133(C).
    4. Rice, Gregory & Wirjanto, Tony & Zhao, Yuqian, 2020. "Forecasting value at risk with intra-day return curves," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 36(3), pages 1023-1038.
    5. Berens, Tobias & Weiß, Gregor N.F. & Wied, Dominik, 2015. "Testing for structural breaks in correlations: Does it improve Value-at-Risk forecasting?," Journal of Empirical Finance, Elsevier, vol. 32(C), pages 135-152.
    6. Ali Atiah Alzahrani, 2026. "Verify Claims, Not Scores: Evidence-Based Verification of Modular Agents," Papers 2610.01348, arXiv.org.
    7. Marco Rocco, 2011. "Extreme value theory for finance: a survey," Questioni di Economia e Finanza (Occasional Papers) 99, Bank of Italy, Economic Research and International Relations Area.
    8. Chuliá, Helena & Garrón, Ignacio & Uribe, Jorge M., 2024. "Daily growth at risk: Financial or real drivers? The answer is not always the same," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 40(2), pages 762-776.
    9. Haji Mohamad Zubir, Ahmad Shauqi bin & Mohd Nasir, Muhammad Luqman bin, 2026. "Where Volume Belongs in a Tail Risk Model: Extreme Quantile Forecasts, Subordination, and Market Depth," MPRA Paper 130162, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    10. Evangelos Vasileiou, 2022. "Correction to: Inaccurate Value at Risk Estimations: Bad Modeling or Inappropriate Data?," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 59(3), pages 1173-1173, March.
    11. Ra l De Jes s Guti rrez & Lidia E. Carvajal Guti rrez & Oswaldo Garcia Salgado, 2023. "Value at Risk and Expected Shortfall Estimation for Mexico s Isthmus Crude Oil Using Long-Memory GARCH-EVT Combined Approaches," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, vol. 13(4), pages 467-480, July.
    12. Polanski, Arnold & Stoja, Evarist, 2017. "Forecasting multidimensional tail risk at short and long horizons," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 33(4), pages 958-969.
    13. Gerlach, Richard & Wang, Chao, 2020. "Semi-parametric dynamic asymmetric Laplace models for tail risk forecasting, incorporating realized measures," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 36(2), pages 489-506.
    14. Alexander, Carol & Sheedy, Elizabeth, 2008. "Developing a stress testing framework based on market risk models," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 32(10), pages 2220-2236, October.
    15. Yun Feng & Weijie Hou & Yuping Song, 2024. "Tail risk forecasting and its application to margin requirements in the commodity futures market," Journal of Forecasting, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 43(5), pages 1513-1529, August.
    16. Peña, Juan Ignacio & Rodríguez, Rosa & Mayoral, Silvia, 2020. "Tail risk of electricity futures," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    17. Gonzalo Cortazar & Alejandro Bernales & Diether Beuermann, 2005. "Methodology and Implementation of Value-at-Risk Measures in Emerging Fixed-Income Markets with Infrequent Trading," Finance 0512030, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    18. Jiménez, Inés & Mora-Valencia, Andrés & Perote, Javier, 2022. "Semi-nonparametric risk assessment with cryptocurrencies," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 59(C).
    19. Stelios Bekiros & Nikolaos Loukeris & Iordanis Eleftheriadis & Christos Avdoulas, 2019. "Tail-Related Risk Measurement and Forecasting in Equity Markets," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 53(2), pages 783-816, February.
    20. Timo Dimitriadis & iaochun Liu & Julie Schnaitmann, 2023. "Encompassing Tests for Value at Risk and Expected Shortfall Multistep Forecasts Based on Inference on the Boundary," Journal of Financial Econometrics, Oxford University Press, vol. 21(2), pages 412-444.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2610.14584. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.