IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2608.19389.html

Concentrated Liquidity Provision: a Reinforcement Learning Perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Georgios Chionas
  • Charalampos Kleitsikas
  • Stefanos Leonardos
  • Leandro S'anchez-Betancourt
  • Carmine Ventre

Abstract

Automated market makers (AMMs) are a cornerstone of decentralised finance (DeFi). Constant product markets with concentrated liquidity, such as UniswapV3, are now a well-established design. In these markets, liquidity providers (LPs) face a sequential decision problem: they must decide when to rebalance their positions and which price ranges to allocate capital to as market conditions evolve. We formulate dynamic liquidity provision as a stochastic impulse control problem and use reinforcement learning (RL) to solve it, focusing on providing interpretable solutions. We show that learned policies exhibit rich state-dependent behaviour, allocating liquidity according to mispricing, rebalancing costs, uncertainty, inventory exposure, and heterogeneous risk preferences. These behaviours help compress the left tail of the Profit and Loss (PnL) distribution and avoid catastrophic outcomes under high uncertainty. Finally, we benchmark the RL agents against baseline and sophisticated agents from the AMM microstructure literature and analyse their performance.

Suggested Citation

  • Georgios Chionas & Charalampos Kleitsikas & Stefanos Leonardos & Leandro S'anchez-Betancourt & Carmine Ventre, 2026. "Concentrated Liquidity Provision: a Reinforcement Learning Perspective," Papers 2608.19389, arXiv.org.
  • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2608.19389
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2608.19389
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. 'Alvaro Cartea & Fayc{c}al Drissi & Marcello Monga, 2023. "Decentralised Finance and Automated Market Making: Predictable Loss and Optimal Liquidity Provision," Papers 2309.08431, arXiv.org, revised Jun 2024.
    2. Haonan Xu & Alessio Brini, 2025. "Improving DeFi Accessibility through Efficient Liquidity Provisioning with Deep Reinforcement Learning," Papers 2501.07508, arXiv.org.
    3. Daniele Maria Di Nosse & Federico Gatta & Fabrizio Lillo & Sebastian Jaimungal, 2025. "Deviations from Tradition: Stylized Facts in the Era of DeFi," Papers 2510.22834, arXiv.org.
    4. Álvaro Cartea & Fayçal Drissi & Marcello Monga, 2023. "Predictable Losses of Liquidity Provision in Constant Function Markets and Concentrated Liquidity Markets," Applied Mathematical Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 30(2), pages 69-93, March.
    5. Leonardo Baggiani & Martin Herdegen & Leandro Sanchez-Betancourt, 2026. "Competition between DEXs through Dynamic Fees," Papers 2603.09669, arXiv.org.
    6. Jerome F. Eastham & Kevin J. Hastings, 1988. "Optimal Impulse Control of Portfolios," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 13(4), pages 588-605, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Farbod Ghasemlu, 2026. "Optimal Dynamic Fees for Automated Market Makers: A Stochastic Control Approach to Loss-Versus-Rebalancing," Papers 2606.21769, arXiv.org.
    2. Pranay Anchuri, 2026. "RAmmStein: Regime Adaptation in Mean-reverting Markets with Stein Thresholds -- Optimal Impulse Control in Concentrated AMMs," Papers 2602.19419, arXiv.org, revised Mar 2026.
    3. Masaaki Fukasawa & Basile Maire & Marcus Wunsch, 2025. "Liquidity provision of utility indifference type in decentralized exchanges," Digital Finance, Springer, vol. 7(2), pages 255-273, June.
    4. Sunghun Ko, 2026. "Partially Active Automated Market Makers," Papers 2602.09887, arXiv.org.
    5. Daniele Maria Di Nosse & Federico Gatta, 2024. "A Multi-step Approach for Minimizing Risk in Decentralized Exchanges," Papers 2406.07200, arXiv.org, revised Jun 2024.
    6. Wen-Ting Wang, 2026. "Reinforcement Learning for Execution under Dynamic Fees in a Closed-Loop DEX Simulator," Papers 2607.10960, arXiv.org.
    7. Andrey Urusov & Rostislav Berezovskiy & Anatoly Krestenko & Andrei Kornilov & Yury Yanovich, 2025. "Dynamic Liquidity Provision in Decentralized Markets: Strategy Optimization and Performance Evaluation in Concentrated Liquidity AMMs," Papers 2505.15338, arXiv.org, revised Mar 2026.
    8. Daniele Maria Di Nosse & Federico Gatta & Fabrizio Lillo & Sebastian Jaimungal, 2025. "Deviations from Tradition: Stylized Facts in the Era of DeFi," Papers 2510.22834, arXiv.org.
    9. Christoph Belak & Lukas Mich & Frank T. Seifried, 2019. "Optimal Investment for Retail Investors with Flooredand Capped Costs," Working Paper Series 2019-06, University of Trier, Research Group Quantitative Finance and Risk Analysis.
    10. Agostino Capponi & 'Alvaro Cartea & Fayc{c}al Drissi, 2026. "The Viability of Blockchain Markets under Discrete Clearing and Paid Priority," Papers 2605.17425, arXiv.org.
    11. Baccarin, Stefano, 2009. "Optimal impulse control for a multidimensional cash management system with generalized cost functions," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 196(1), pages 198-206, July.
    12. Robin Fritsch & Andrea Canidio, 2024. "Measuring Arbitrage Losses and Profitability of AMM Liquidity," Papers 2404.05803, arXiv.org, revised Apr 2024.
    13. Christoph Belak & Lukas Mich & Frank T. Seifried, 2022. "Optimal investment for retail investors," Mathematical Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(2), pages 555-594, April.
    14. Valeri Zakamouline, 2005. "A unified approach to portfolio optimization with linear transaction costs," Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research (GOR);Nederlands Genootschap voor Besliskunde (NGB), vol. 62(2), pages 319-343, November.
    15. Diego Zabaljauregui, 2019. "A fixed-point policy-iteration-type algorithm for symmetric nonzero-sum stochastic impulse control games," Papers 1909.03574, arXiv.org, revised Jun 2020.
    16. Valeri Zakamouline, 2003. "European Option Pricing and Hedging with both Fixed and Proportional Transaction Costs," Finance 0311009, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    17. Haolin Feng & Kumar Muthuraman, 2010. "A Computational Method for Stochastic Impulse Control Problems," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 35(4), pages 830-850, November.
    18. Cadenillas, Abel & Zapatero, Fernando, 1999. "Optimal Central Bank Intervention in the Foreign Exchange Market," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 87(1), pages 218-242, July.
    19. Alif Aqsha & Philippe Bergault & Leandro S'anchez-Betancourt, 2025. "Equilibrium Reward for Liquidity Providers in Automated Market Makers," Papers 2503.22502, arXiv.org.
    20. Leonardo Baggiani & Martin Herdegen & Leandro S'anchez-Betancourt, 2025. "Optimal Dynamic Fees in Automated Market Makers," Papers 2506.02869, arXiv.org, revised Jul 2026.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2608.19389. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.