IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2607.22511.html

CausalSmith: A Formally Grounded, Self-Improving Agentic Framework for Automated Research in Causal Inference

Author

Listed:
  • Jiyuan Tan
  • Vasilis Syrgkanis

Abstract

Automating theoretical research requires generating candidate results and evaluating them reliably. Models keep getting better at the first, while the second remains hard. A common approach asks one large language model (LLM) to review what another produced, yet such reviewers are empirically unreliable: they may accept fabricated papers and catch the fabrication at close to chance rates~\citep{badscientist2025}. We present \textsc{CausalSmith}, a framework for automated theoretical research in causal inference built on the Lean proof assistant, where a proof is checked by a program rather than read by a referee. \textsc{CausalSmith} rests on \textsc{Causalean}, a foundational Lean library for causal inference holding 8,179 machine-checked definitions and theorems, developed with language-model assistance under human design and review. Around it, we build a self-improving agentic pipeline that selects research topics, proposes results, formalizes statements, constructs proofs, and presents the resulting artifacts for human inspection. Moreover, the pipeline pairs Lean verification with a statement audit that compares each formal theorem against the informal claim behind it. We evaluate the system using artifacts produced by completed autonomous research runs. The source code, formal library, and run records are available at https://github.com/Jiyuan-Tan/CausalSmith.

Suggested Citation

  • Jiyuan Tan & Vasilis Syrgkanis, 2026. "CausalSmith: A Formally Grounded, Self-Improving Agentic Framework for Automated Research in Causal Inference," Papers 2607.22511, arXiv.org, revised Sep 2026.
  • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2607.22511
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2607.22511
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Trieu H. Trinh & Yuhuai Wu & Quoc V. Le & He He & Thang Luong, 2024. "Solving olympiad geometry without human demonstrations," Nature, Nature, vol. 625(7995), pages 476-482, January.
    2. Trieu H. Trinh & Yuhuai Wu & Quoc V. Le & He He & Thang Luong, 2024. "Author Correction: Solving olympiad geometry without human demonstrations," Nature, Nature, vol. 627(8004), pages 8-8, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Shaheer U. Saeed & Yipei Wang & Veeru Kasivisvanathan & Brian R. Davidson & Matthew J. Clarkson & Yipeng Hu & Daniel C. Alexander, 2026. "Reasoning in machine vision by learning fast and slow thinking," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 17(1), pages 1-11, December.
    2. Wenhao Zhou & Faqiang Liu & Hao Zheng & Rong Zhao, 2025. "Mitigating data bias and ensuring reliable evaluation of AI models with shortcut hull learning," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 16(1), pages 1-15, December.
    3. Sendhil Mullainathan & Ashesh Rambachan, 2025. "Science in the Age of Algorithms," NBER Chapters, in: The Economics of Transformative AI, pages 337-360, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    4. Zhou, Qiang & Yang, Yefei & Ma, Fangfang & Cheng, T.C. Edwin, 2026. "Multi-agent deep reinforcement learning for ordering and inventory allocation in a decentralized two-echelon dual-channel supply chain," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 299(C).
    5. Michael Klesel & H. Felix Wittmann, 2025. "Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG)," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 67(4), pages 551-561, August.
    6. Andrew J. Peterson, 2025. "Training for Obsolescence? The AI-Driven Education Trap," Papers 2508.19625, arXiv.org, revised Nov 2025.
    7. Yao, Jiachi & Han, Te, 2026. "Utilizing large-scale foundation models for prognostics and health management in wind turbines: Techniques, challenges, and future directions," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 227(C).
    8. Hung Tran & Viet Bui & Tien Mai, 2026. "Learning Sequential Mobility Choice: A Review of Route and Activity Choice through Inverse Reinforcement Learning and Imitation Learning," Papers 2608.15339, arXiv.org, revised Sep 2026.
    9. Boštjan Gec & Sašo Džeroski & Ljupčo Todorovski, 2024. "Discovery of Exact Equations for Integer Sequences," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-22, November.
    10. Simon D Angus, 2024. "Tracking Policy-relevant Narratives of Democratic Resilience at Scale: from experts and machines, to AI & the transformer revolution," SoDa Laboratories Working Paper Series 2024-07, Monash University.
    11. Kai Ruan & Xuan Wang & Jixiang Hong & Peng Wang & Yang Liu & Hao Sun, 2026. "Evaluating LLMs' divergent thinking capabilities for scientific idea generation with minimal context," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 17(1), pages 1-14, December.
    12. Fernández-Villaverde, Jesús & Nuño, Galo & Perla, Jesse, 2024. "Taming the Curse of Dimensionality: Quantitative Economics with Deep Learning," CEPR Discussion Papers 19636, Centre for Economic Policy Research.
    13. Chenyu Huang & Zhengyang Tang & Shixi Hu & Ruoqing Jiang & Xin Zheng & Dongdong Ge & Benyou Wang & Zizhuo Wang, 2025. "ORLM: A Customizable Framework in Training Large Models for Automated Optimization Modeling," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 73(6), pages 2986-3009, November.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2607.22511. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.