IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2606.01706.html

Higher-Order Debiased Estimators for General Treatment Models

Author

Listed:
  • Yulin Zhang
  • Lin Liu
  • Zheng Zhang

Abstract

It is now well known that estimators based on influence functions can be sub-optimal in terms of convergence rates in various settings. To address this issue, higher-order influence functions (HOIF) are developed, generalizing the classical semiparametric theory. However, most existing results in this regard focus on treatment effect parameters defined in explicit forms, such as average treatment effects (ATE). In applications, economists are often confronted with tasks of inferring more complex parameters, such as quantile treatment effects (QTE) or effects of complicated treatment regimes/policy. These more complex parameters can often only be implicitly defined as the solution to nonlinear estimating equations, which correspond to M/Z-estimation problems. Our current understanding of these problems is mainly limited to the classical semiparametric theory. Given the foundational role of HOIF for estimating explicit parameters such as ATE, a modest step toward enriching the statistical foundation of econometrics and causal inference is to develop the corresponding higher-order estimators for those more complex parameters. To this end, we consider parameters of a class of non-separable structural models in the econometrics literature and develop a class of higher-order estimators for the target parameters. Statistical properties of these higher-order estimators are derived using recent advances in U-processes theory. Our proposed higher-order estimators relax complexity-reducing assumptions, quantified by Holder smoothness, imposed on the nuisance parameters compared to existing alternative estimators for many important parameters in this class, including QTE and quantile dose-response functions, among others.

Suggested Citation

  • Yulin Zhang & Lin Liu & Zheng Zhang, 2026. "Higher-Order Debiased Estimators for General Treatment Models," Papers 2606.01706, arXiv.org, revised Jun 2026.
  • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2606.01706
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2606.01706
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bhattacharya, Rabi N. & Ghosh, Jayanta K., 1992. "A class of U-statistics and asymptotic normality of the number of k-clusters," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 43(2), pages 300-330, November.
    2. Cattaneo, Matias D. & Farrell, Max H. & Jansson, Michael & Masini, Ricardo P., 2025. "Higher-order refinements of small bandwidth asymptotics for density-weighted average derivative estimators," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 252(PB).
    3. Matias D Cattaneo & Michael Jansson & Xinwei Ma, 2019. "Two-Step Estimation and Inference with Possibly Many Included Covariates," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 86(3), pages 1095-1122.
    4. Matias D. Cattaneo & Michael Jansson, 2018. "Kernel†Based Semiparametric Estimators: Small Bandwidth Asymptotics and Bootstrap Consistency," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 86(3), pages 955-995, May.
    5. Chunrong Ai & Xiaohong Chen, 2003. "Efficient Estimation of Models with Conditional Moment Restrictions Containing Unknown Functions," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 71(6), pages 1795-1843, November.
    6. Rajarshi Mukherjee & Whitney K. Newey & James Robins, 2017. "Semiparametric efficient empirical higher order influence function estimators," CeMMAP working papers CWP30/17, Centre for Microdata Methods and Practice, Institute for Fiscal Studies.
    7. Liu, Lin & Mukherjee, Rajarshi & Robins, James M., 2024. "Assumption-lean falsification tests of rate double-robustness of double-machine-learning estimators," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 240(2).
    8. Xiaohong Chen & Haitian Xie, 2025. "Local Overidentification and Efficiency Gains in Modern Causal Inference and Data Combination," Cowles Foundation Discussion Papers 2467, Cowles Foundation for Research in Economics, Yale University.
    9. Rajarshi Mukherjee & Whitney K. Newey & James Robins, 2017. "Semiparametric efficient empirical higher order influence function estimators," CeMMAP working papers 30/17, Institute for Fiscal Studies.
    10. Chunrong Ai & Oliver Linton & Kaiji Motegi & Zheng Zhang, 2021. "A unified framework for efficient estimation of general treatment models," Quantitative Economics, Econometric Society, vol. 12(3), pages 779-816, July.
    11. Edward H. Kennedy & Zongming Ma & Matthew D. McHugh & Dylan S. Small, 2017. "Non-parametric methods for doubly robust estimation of continuous treatment effects," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 79(4), pages 1229-1245, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Liu, Lin & Mukherjee, Rajarshi & Robins, James M., 2024. "Assumption-lean falsification tests of rate double-robustness of double-machine-learning estimators," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 240(2).
    2. Xingyu Chen & Lin Liu & Rajarshi Mukherjee, 2024. "Method-of-Moments Inference for GLMs and Doubly Robust Functionals under Proportional Asymptotics," Papers 2408.06103, arXiv.org, revised May 2025.
    3. Lin Liu & Chang Li, 2023. "New $\sqrt{n}$-consistent, numerically stable higher-order influence function estimators," Papers 2302.08097, arXiv.org.
    4. Yujia Gu & Lin Liu & Wei Ma, 2025. "Assumption-lean covariate adjustment under covariate adaptive randomization when $p = o (n)$," Papers 2512.20046, arXiv.org.
    5. Ganesh Karapakula, 2023. "Stable Probability Weighting: Large-Sample and Finite-Sample Estimation and Inference Methods for Heterogeneous Causal Effects of Multivalued Treatments Under Limited Overlap," Papers 2301.05703, arXiv.org, revised Jan 2023.
    6. Lin Liu & Rajarshi Mukherjee & James M Robins, 2026. "On the Asymptotic Inadmissibility of Double Machine Learning Estimators Under Structure-Agnostic Models," Papers 2606.22391, arXiv.org.
    7. Zeqi Wu & Meilin Wang & Wei Huang & Zheng Zhang, 2025. "A New and Efficient Debiased Estimation of General Treatment Models by Balanced Neural Networks Weighting," Papers 2507.04044, arXiv.org.
    8. Jikai Jin & Vasilis Syrgkanis, 2024. "Structure-agnostic Optimality of Doubly Robust Learning for Treatment Effect Estimation," Papers 2402.14264, arXiv.org, revised Jun 2025.
    9. Sihui Zhao & Xinbo Wang & Lin Liu & Xin Zhang, 2024. "Covariate Adjustment in Randomized Experiments Motivated by Higher-Order Influence Functions," Papers 2411.08491, arXiv.org, revised Nov 2025.
    10. Kyle Colangelo & Ying-Ying Lee, 2019. "Double debiased machine learning nonparametric inference with continuous treatments," CeMMAP working papers CWP72/19, Centre for Microdata Methods and Practice, Institute for Fiscal Studies.
    11. Cattaneo, Matias D. & Farrell, Max H. & Jansson, Michael & Masini, Ricardo P., 2025. "Higher-order refinements of small bandwidth asymptotics for density-weighted average derivative estimators," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 252(PB).
    12. Wei Huang & Oliver Linton & Zheng Zhang, 2022. "A Unified Framework for Specification Tests of Continuous Treatment Effect Models," Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 40(4), pages 1817-1830, October.
    13. Kyle Colangelo & Ying-Ying Lee, 2020. "Double Debiased Machine Learning Nonparametric Inference with Continuous Treatments," Papers 2004.03036, arXiv.org, revised Sep 2023.
    14. Yukitoshi Matsushita & Taisuke Otsu & Keisuke Takahata, 2022. "Estimating density ratio of marginals to joint: Applications to causal inference," STICERD - Econometrics Paper Series 619, Suntory and Toyota International Centres for Economics and Related Disciplines, LSE.
    15. Ai, Chunrong & Linton, Oliver & Zhang, Zheng, 2022. "Estimation and inference for the counterfactual distribution and quantile functions in continuous treatment models," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 228(1), pages 39-61.
    16. Chen, Xiaohong & Liu, Ying & Ma, Shujie & Zhang, Zheng, 2024. "Causal inference of general treatment effects using neural networks with a diverging number of confounders," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 238(1).
    17. Victor Chernozhukov & Whitney Newey & Rahul Singh & Vasilis Syrgkanis, 2020. "Adversarial Estimation of Riesz Representers," Papers 2101.00009, arXiv.org, revised Apr 2024.
    18. Yulia Kotlyarova & Marcia M. A. Schafgans & Victoria Zinde-Walsh, 2022. "Correction to: Rates of Expansions for Functional Estimators," Journal of Quantitative Economics, Springer;The Indian Econometric Society (TIES), vol. 20(2), pages 487-487, June.
    19. Qingliang Fan & Yu-Chin Hsu & Robert P. Lieli & Yichong Zhang, 2022. "Estimation of Conditional Average Treatment Effects With High-Dimensional Data," Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 40(1), pages 313-327, January.
    20. Juan Carlos Escanciano & Joel Robert Terschuur, 2022. "Debiased Machine Learning U-statistics," Papers 2206.05235, arXiv.org, revised Jun 2026.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2606.01706. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.