IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2603.20252.html

FinReflectKG -- HalluBench: GraphRAG Hallucination Benchmark for Financial Question Answering Systems

Author

Listed:
  • Mahesh Kumar
  • Bhaskarjit Sarmah
  • Stefano Pasquali

Abstract

As organizations increasingly integrate AI-powered question-answering systems into financial information systems for compliance, risk assessment, and decision support, ensuring the factual accuracy of AI-generated outputs becomes a critical engineering challenge. Current Knowledge Graph (KG)-augmented QA systems lack systematic mechanisms to detect hallucinations - factually incorrect outputs that undermine reliability and user trust. We introduce FinBench-QA-Hallucination, a benchmark for evaluating hallucination detection methods in KG-augmented financial QA over SEC 10-K filings. The dataset contains 755 annotated examples from 300 pages, each labeled for groundedness using a conservative evidence-linkage protocol requiring support from both textual chunks and extracted relational triplets. We evaluate six detection approaches - LLM judges, fine-tuned classifiers, Natural Language Inference (NLI) models, span detectors, and embedding-based methods under two conditions: with and without KG triplets. Results show that LLM-based judges and embedding approaches achieve the highest performance (F1: 0.82-0.86) under clean conditions. However, most methods degrade significantly when noisy triplets are introduced, with Matthews Correlation Coefficient (MCC) dropping 44-84 percent, while embedding methods remain relatively robust with only 9 percent degradation. Statistical tests (Cochran's Q and McNemar) confirm significant performance differences (p

Suggested Citation

  • Mahesh Kumar & Bhaskarjit Sarmah & Stefano Pasquali, 2026. "FinReflectKG -- HalluBench: GraphRAG Hallucination Benchmark for Financial Question Answering Systems," Papers 2603.20252, arXiv.org.
  • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2603.20252
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://arxiv.org/pdf/2603.20252
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yi Yang & Yixuan Tang & Kar Yan Tam, 2023. "InvestLM: A Large Language Model for Investment using Financial Domain Instruction Tuning," Papers 2309.13064, arXiv.org.
    2. Shijie Wu & Ozan Irsoy & Steven Lu & Vadim Dabravolski & Mark Dredze & Sebastian Gehrmann & Prabhanjan Kambadur & David Rosenberg & Gideon Mann, 2023. "BloombergGPT: A Large Language Model for Finance," Papers 2303.17564, arXiv.org, revised Dec 2023.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lars Hornuf & David J. Streich & Niklas Töllich, 2025. "Making GenAI Smarter: Evidence from a Portfolio Allocation Experiment," CESifo Working Paper Series 11862, CESifo.
    2. Yuqi Nie & Yaxuan Kong & Xiaowen Dong & John M. Mulvey & H. Vincent Poor & Qingsong Wen & Stefan Zohren, 2024. "A Survey of Large Language Models for Financial Applications: Progress, Prospects and Challenges," Papers 2406.11903, arXiv.org.
    3. Qianggang Ding & Haochen Shi & Jiadong Guo & Bang Liu, 2024. "TradExpert: Revolutionizing Trading with Mixture of Expert LLMs," Papers 2411.00782, arXiv.org, revised May 2025.
    4. Fernando Spadea & Oshani Seneviratne, 2025. "Aligning Language Models with Investor and Market Behavior for Financial Recommendations," Papers 2510.15993, arXiv.org.
    5. Zhiyu Cao & Zachary Feinstein, 2024. "Large Language Model in Financial Regulatory Interpretation," Papers 2405.06808, arXiv.org, revised Jul 2024.
    6. Mohammed-Khalil Ghali & Cecil Pang & Oscar Molina & Carlos Gershenson-Garcia & Daehan Won, 2025. "Forecasting Commodity Price Shocks Using Temporal and Semantic Fusion of Prices Signals and Agentic Generative AI Extracted Economic News," Papers 2508.06497, arXiv.org.
    7. Ching-Nam Hang & Pei-Duo Yu & Roberto Morabito & Chee-Wei Tan, 2024. "Large Language Models Meet Next-Generation Networking Technologies: A Review," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 16(10), pages 1-29, October.
    8. Xia Li & Hanghang Zheng & Xiwei Zhuang & Zhong Wang & Xiao Chen & Hong Liu & Jasmine Bai & Mao Mao, 2025. "Class-Imbalanced-Aware Adaptive Dataset Distillation for Scalable Pretrained Model on Credit Scoring," Papers 2501.10677, arXiv.org, revised Mar 2026.
    9. Lezhi Li & Ting-Yu Chang & Hai Wang, 2023. "Multimodal Gen-AI for Fundamental Investment Research," Papers 2401.06164, arXiv.org.
    10. Cristina Angelico & Enrico Bernardini, 2026. "Can GenAI fill banks' emissions data gaps?," Questioni di Economia e Finanza (Occasional Papers) 1003, Bank of Italy, Economic Research and International Relations Area.
    11. Xuewen Han & Neng Wang & Shangkun Che & Hongyang Yang & Kunpeng Zhang & Sean Xin Xu, 2024. "Enhancing Investment Analysis: Optimizing AI-Agent Collaboration in Financial Research," Papers 2411.04788, arXiv.org.
    12. Thanos Konstantinidis & Giorgos Iacovides & Mingxue Xu & Tony G. Constantinides & Danilo Mandic, 2024. "FinLlama: Financial Sentiment Classification for Algorithmic Trading Applications," Papers 2403.12285, arXiv.org.
    13. Yijia Xiao & Edward Sun & Tong Chen & Fang Wu & Di Luo & Wei Wang, 2025. "Trading-R1: Financial Trading with LLM Reasoning via Reinforcement Learning," Papers 2509.11420, arXiv.org.
    14. Liyuan Chen & Shuoling Liu & Jiangpeng Yan & Xiaoyu Wang & Henglin Liu & Chuang Li & Kecheng Jiao & Jixuan Ying & Yang Veronica Liu & Qiang Yang & Xiu Li, 2025. "Advancing Financial Engineering with Foundation Models: Progress, Applications, and Challenges," Papers 2507.18577, arXiv.org, revised Dec 2025.
    15. Meyer, Julian Anton, 2025. "Success factors and development areas for the implementation of Generative AI in companies," Junior Management Science (JUMS), Junior Management Science e. V., vol. 10(1), pages 1-23.
    16. Hui Gong, 2026. "AI Agents in Financial Markets: Architecture, Applications, and Systemic Implications," Papers 2603.13942, arXiv.org, revised Apr 2026.
    17. Frank Xing, 2024. "Designing Heterogeneous LLM Agents for Financial Sentiment Analysis," Papers 2401.05799, arXiv.org.
    18. Maher Hamid, 2026. "Implementing domain-specific LLMs for strategic investment decisions: a retrospective case study comparing AI and human expertise," Digital Finance, Springer, vol. 8(1), pages 1-134, March.
    19. Ankur Sinha & Chaitanya Agarwal & Pekka Malo, 2025. "FinBloom: Knowledge Grounding Large Language Model with Real-time Financial Data," Papers 2502.18471, arXiv.org, revised Feb 2026.
    20. Hoyoung Lee & Youngsoo Choi & Yuhee Kwon, 2024. "Quantifying Qualitative Insights: Leveraging LLMs to Market Predict," Papers 2411.08404, arXiv.org.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2603.20252. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.