IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2511.13275.html

Why Do the Elderly Save? Using Health Shocks to Uncover Bequests Motives

Author

Listed:
  • Tetsuya Kaji
  • Elena Manresa

Abstract

We revisit the saving behavior of elderly singles using an adversarial structural estimation framework by Kaji, Manresa and Pouliot (2023). The method bridges the simulated method of moments (SMM) and maximum-likelihood estimation by embedding a flexible discriminator, implemented as a neural network, that adaptively selects the most informative features of the data. Applying this approach to the model of De Nardi, French, and Jones (2010) with AHEAD data, we show that including gender and health histories in the discriminator improves identification and precision of bequests motives. The resulting estimates reveal that bequest motives explain between $13\%$ and $19\%$ percent of late-life savings across all permanent-income quintiles, not only among the rich. The adversarial estimator precisely disentangles bequest motives from precautionary savings motives. These findings suggest that heterogeneity in health-related survival expectations is another important source of identifying variation to distinguishing bequest and precautionary saving motives.

Suggested Citation

  • Tetsuya Kaji & Elena Manresa, 2025. "Why Do the Elderly Save? Using Health Shocks to Uncover Bequests Motives," Papers 2511.13275, arXiv.org.
  • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2511.13275
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://arxiv.org/pdf/2511.13275
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tetsuya Kaji & Elena Manresa & Guillaume Pouliot, 2023. "An Adversarial Approach to Structural Estimation," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 91(6), pages 2041-2063, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Harold D. Chiang, 2025. "Maximal Inequalities for Separately Exchangeable Empirical Processes," Papers 2502.11432, arXiv.org, revised Mar 2025.
    2. Jesús Fernández-Villaverde & Galo Nuño & Jesse Perla, 2024. "Taming the Curse of Dimensionality: Quantitative Economics with Deep Learning," NBER Working Papers 33117, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    3. Andr'es Aradillas Fern'andez & Jos'e Blanchet & Jos'e Luis Montiel Olea & Chen Qiu & Jorg Stoye & Lezhi Tan, 2025. "Epsilon-Minimax Solutions of Statistical Decision Problems," Papers 2509.08107, arXiv.org, revised Jan 2026.
    4. Yanhao & Wei & Zhenling Jiang, 2025. "Estimating Parameters of Structural Models Using Neural Networks," Papers 2502.04945, arXiv.org.
    5. Yanhao 'Max' Wei & Zhenling Jiang, 2025. "Pre-Training Estimators for Structural Models: Application to Consumer Search," Papers 2505.00526, arXiv.org, revised Nov 2025.
    6. Harold D. Chiang & Jack Collison & Lorenzo Magnolfi & Christopher Sullivan, 2025. "Enhancing the Merger Simulation Toolkit with ML/AI," Papers 2506.05225, arXiv.org.
    7. Irene Botosaru & Isaac Loh & Chris Muris, 2024. "An Adversarial Approach to Identification," Papers 2411.04239, arXiv.org, revised Dec 2024.
    8. Sendhil Mullainathan & Ashesh Rambachan, 2024. "From Predictive Algorithms to Automatic Generation of Anomalies," NBER Working Papers 32422, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    9. Jean-Jacques Forneron & Zhongjun Qu, 2024. "Fitting Dynamically Misspecified Models: An Optimal Transportation Approach," Papers 2412.20204, arXiv.org, revised Jul 2025.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2511.13275. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.