IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2509.22223.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Metro 3 in Brussels under uncertainty: scenario-based public transport accessibility analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Brecht Verbeken
  • Arne Vanhoyweghen
  • Vincent Ginis

Abstract

Metro Line 3 in Brussels is one of Europe's most debated infrastructure projects, marked by escalating costs, delays, and uncertainty over completion. Yet no public accessibility appraisal exists to inform this policy debate. This paper provides a scenario-based assessment of the spatial and distributional accessibility impacts of Metro 3 using schedule-based public transport data. Official GTFS feeds from all regional operators were combined and adapted to represent three scenarios: (i) the current network, (ii) partial implementation of Metro 3 (conversion of the southern premetro section), and (iii) full implementation to Bordet. Accessibility was measured as public transport travel time between 647 evenly spaced 500 m points covering the Brussels-Capital Region. Simulations were conducted for morning, evening, and weekend midday periods, each with three departure times (t-10, t, t+10), capturing robustness to short-term timetable variation. Results show substantial but uneven accessibility gains, with the largest improvements occurring in neighborhoods with below-average incomes. Temporal robustness analysis highlights variability in accessibility outcomes, underscoring the need to account for uncertainty in departure timing. These findings suggest that Metro 3 has the potential to reduce socio-spatial inequalities in accessibility, providing transparent evidence for a project where public debate is dominated by cost concerns.

Suggested Citation

  • Brecht Verbeken & Arne Vanhoyweghen & Vincent Ginis, 2025. "Metro 3 in Brussels under uncertainty: scenario-based public transport accessibility analysis," Papers 2509.22223, arXiv.org.
    • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2509.22223
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://arxiv.org/pdf/2509.22223
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Stępniak, Marcin & Pritchard, John P. & Geurs, Karst T. & Goliszek, Sławomir, 2019. "The impact of temporal resolution on public transport accessibility measurement: Review and case study in Poland," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 8-24.
    2. Boisjoly, Geneviève & El-Geneidy, Ahmed, 2016. "Daily fluctuations in transit and job availability: A comparative assessment of time-sensitive accessibility measures," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 73-81.
    3. te Boveldt, Geert & Van Raemdonck, Koen & Macharis, Cathy, 2018. "A new railway tunnel under Brussels? Assessing political feasibility and desirability with competence-based multi criteria analysis," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 30-39.
    4. Rand R. Wilcox & David M. Erceg-Hurn, 2012. "Comparing two dependent groups via quantiles," Journal of Applied Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 39(12), pages 2655-2664, August.
    5. Pereira, Rafael H.M., 2019. "Future accessibility impacts of transport policy scenarios: Equity and sensitivity to travel time thresholds for Bus Rapid Transit expansion in Rio de Janeiro," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 321-332.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Soukhov, Anastasia & Mooney, Nicholas & Ravensbergen, Léa, 2025. "Exploring mobility of care with measures of accessibility," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 123(C).
    2. Wang, Hui & Loo, Becky P.Y., 2024. "The public transport disadvantaged in a highly transit-oriented city: An analytical framework, key challenges and opportunities," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    3. Shi, Yuji & Blainey, Simon & Sun, Chao & Jing, Peng, 2020. "A literature review on accessibility using bibliometric analysis techniques," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 87(C).
    4. Ryan, Jean & Pereira, Rafael H.M. & Andersson, Magnus, 2023. "Accessibility and space-time differences in when and how different groups (choose to) travel," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 111(C).
    5. Yan, Xiang & Bejleri, Ilir & Zhai, Liang, 2022. "A spatiotemporal analysis of transit accessibility to low-wage jobs in Miami-Dade County," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
    6. Bimpou, Konstantina & Ferguson, Neil S., 2020. "Dynamic accessibility: Incorporating day-to-day travel time reliability into accessibility measurement," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
    7. Yang, Lan & Eom, Sunyong & Suzuki, Tsutomu, 2021. "Measuring railway network performance considering accessibility levels in cities worldwide," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 96(C).
    8. Amparo Moyano & Marcin Stępniak & Borja Moya-Gómez & Juan Carlos García-Palomares, 2021. "Traffic congestion and economic context: changes of spatiotemporal patterns of traffic travel times during crisis and post-crisis periods," Transportation, Springer, vol. 48(6), pages 3301-3324, December.
    9. Zhu, Le & Shi, Fei, 2022. "Spatial and social inequalities of job accessibility in Kunshan city, China: Application of the Amap API and mobile phone signaling data," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 104(C).
    10. Herszenhut, Daniel & Pereira, Rafael H.M. & Portugal, Licinio da Silva & Oliveira, Matheus Henrique de Sousa, 2022. "The impact of transit monetary costs on transport inequality," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    11. Hugo de Alba-Martínez & Alejandro L. Grindlay & Gabriela Ochoa-Covarrubias, 2020. "(In)Equitable Accessibility to Sustainable Transport from Universities in the Guadalajara Metropolitan Area, Mexico," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-18, December.
    12. Pangpang Liu & Yichuan Zhao, 2024. "Smoothed empirical likelihood for the difference of two quantiles with the paired sample," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 65(4), pages 2077-2108, June.
    13. repec:osf:socarx:ua2gj_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    14. Boisjoly, Geneviève & Serra, Bernardo & Oliveira, Gabriel T. & El-Geneidy, Ahmed, 2020. "Accessibility measurements in São Paulo, Rio de Janeiro, Curitiba and Recife, Brazil," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    15. Guzman, Luis A. & Cantillo-Garcia, Victor A. & Oviedo, Daniel & Arellana, Julian, 2023. "How much is accessibility worth? Utility-based accessibility to evaluate transport policies," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 112(C).
    16. Zhao, Yingrui & Hu, Songhua & Zhang, Ming, 2024. "Evaluating equitable Transit-Oriented development (TOD) via the Node-Place-People model," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 185(C).
    17. Chen, Enhui & Liu, Yang & Yang, Min & Ye, Zhirui & Nie, Yu (Marco), 2024. "The sustainability appeal of urban rail transit," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 186(C).
    18. Moyano, Amparo & Martínez, Héctor S. & Coronado, José M., 2018. "From network to services: A comparative accessibility analysis of the Spanish high-speed rail system," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 51-60.
    19. Nazari Adli, Saeid & Donovan, Stuart, 2018. "Right to the city: Applying justice tests to public transport investments," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 56-65.
    20. Mengying Cui & David Levinson, 2020. "Primal and Dual Access," Working Papers 2022-01, University of Minnesota: Nexus Research Group.
    21. Mann, Isaac & Levinson, David M., 2024. "Access-based cost-benefit analysis," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2509.22223. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.