IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2507.13562.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

PELVaR: Probability equal level representation of Value at Risk through the notion of Flexible Expected Shortfall

Author

Listed:
  • Georgios I. Papayiannis
  • Georgios Psarrakos

Abstract

This paper proposes a novel perspective on the relationship between Value at Risk (VaR) and Expected Shortfall (ES) by employing the mixing framework of Flexible Expected Shortfall (FES) to construct coherent representations of VaR. The methodology enables a reinterpretation of VaR within a coherent risk measure framework, thereby addressing well-known limitations of VaR, including non-subadditivity and insensitivity to tail risk. A central feature of the framework is the flexibility parameter inherent in FES, which captures salient distributional properties of the underlying risk profile. This parameter is formalized as the $\theta$-index, a normalized measure designed to reflect tail heaviness. Theoretical properties of the $\theta$-index are examined, and its relevance to risk assessment is established. Furthermore, risk capital allocation is analyzed using the Euler principle, facilitating consistent and meaningful marginal attribution. The practical implications of the approach are illustrated through appropriate simulation studies and an empirical analysis based on an insurance loss dataset with pronounced heavy-tailed characteristics.

Suggested Citation

  • Georgios I. Papayiannis & Georgios Psarrakos, 2025. "PELVaR: Probability equal level representation of Value at Risk through the notion of Flexible Expected Shortfall," Papers 2507.13562, arXiv.org.
  • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2507.13562
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://arxiv.org/pdf/2507.13562
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Marco Frittelli & Giacomo Scandolo, 2006. "Risk Measures And Capital Requirements For Processes," Mathematical Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 16(4), pages 589-612, October.
    2. Barczy, Mátyás & K. Nedényi, Fanni & Sütő, László, 2023. "Probability equivalent level of Value at Risk and higher-order Expected Shortfalls," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 107-128.
    3. Li, Hengxin & Wang, Ruodu, 2023. "PELVE: Probability Equivalent Level of VaR and ES," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 234(1), pages 353-370.
    4. Acerbi, Carlo & Tasche, Dirk, 2002. "On the coherence of expected shortfall," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 26(7), pages 1487-1503, July.
    5. Paul Embrechts & Giovanni Puccetti & Ludger Rüschendorf & Ruodu Wang & Antonela Beleraj, 2014. "An Academic Response to Basel 3.5," Risks, MDPI, vol. 2(1), pages 1-24, February.
    6. Wei, Wang & Yatracos, Yannis, 2004. "A stop-loss risk index," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 34(2), pages 241-250, April.
    7. Gribkova, N.V. & Su, J. & Zitikis, R., 2023. "Estimating the VaR-induced Euler allocation rule," ASTIN Bulletin, Cambridge University Press, vol. 53(3), pages 619-635, September.
    8. Carlo Acerbi & Dirk Tasche, 2002. "Expected Shortfall: A Natural Coherent Alternative to Value at Risk," Economic Notes, Banca Monte dei Paschi di Siena SpA, vol. 31(2), pages 379-388, July.
    9. Dirk Tasche, 2009. "Capital allocation for credit portfolios with kernel estimators," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 9(5), pages 581-595.
    10. Tsanakas, Andreas, 2004. "Dynamic capital allocation with distortion risk measures," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 35(2), pages 223-243, October.
    11. Ruodu Wang & Ričardas Zitikis, 2021. "An Axiomatic Foundation for the Expected Shortfall," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 67(3), pages 1413-1429, March.
    12. Belzunce, Félix & Pinar, José F. & Ruiz, José M. & Sordo, Miguel A., 2012. "Comparison of risks based on the expected proportional shortfall," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 51(2), pages 292-302.
    13. Con Keating & Hyun Song Shin & Charles Goodhart & Jon Danielsson, 2001. "An Academic Response to Basel II," FMG Special Papers sp130, Financial Markets Group.
    14. Rockafellar, R. Tyrrell & Uryasev, Stanislav, 2002. "Conditional value-at-risk for general loss distributions," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 26(7), pages 1443-1471, July.
    15. Psarrakos, Georgios & Vliora, Polyxeni, 2024. "On the flexibility and loading maximization for weighted premiums," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 481(C).
    16. Shaun Wang, 1998. "An Actuarial Index of the Right-Tail Risk," North American Actuarial Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 2(2), pages 88-101.
    17. Hans Föllmer & Alexander Schied, 2002. "Convex measures of risk and trading constraints," Finance and Stochastics, Springer, vol. 6(4), pages 429-447.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Marcelo Brutti Righi & Paulo Sergio Ceretta, 2015. "Shortfall Deviation Risk: An alternative to risk measurement," Papers 1501.02007, arXiv.org, revised May 2016.
    2. Lisa R. Goldberg & Ola Mahmoud, 2014. "Drawdown: From Practice to Theory and Back Again," Papers 1404.7493, arXiv.org, revised Sep 2016.
    3. Jinghui Chen & Edward Furman & X. Sheldon Lin, 2025. "Marginal expected shortfall: Systemic risk measurement under dependence uncertainty," Papers 2504.19953, arXiv.org.
    4. Chen, An & Stadje, Mitja & Zhang, Fangyuan, 2024. "On the equivalence between Value-at-Risk- and Expected Shortfall-based risk measures in non-concave optimization," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 114-129.
    5. Roorda, Berend & Schumacher, J.M., 2007. "Time consistency conditions for acceptability measures, with an application to Tail Value at Risk," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 40(2), pages 209-230, March.
    6. Brandtner, Mario, 2013. "Conditional Value-at-Risk, spectral risk measures and (non-)diversification in portfolio selection problems – A comparison with mean–variance analysis," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 37(12), pages 5526-5537.
    7. Martin Herdegen & Cosimo Munari, 2023. "An elementary proof of the dual representation of Expected Shortfall," Papers 2306.14506, arXiv.org.
    8. Martin Herdegen & Cosimo Munari, 2023. "An elementary proof of the dual representation of Expected Shortfall," Mathematics and Financial Economics, Springer, volume 17, number 3, December.
    9. Xia Han & Bin Wang & Ruodu Wang & Qinyu Wu, 2021. "Risk Concentration and the Mean-Expected Shortfall Criterion," Papers 2108.05066, arXiv.org, revised Apr 2022.
    10. Massimiliano Amarante, 2016. "A representation of risk measures," Decisions in Economics and Finance, Springer;Associazione per la Matematica, vol. 39(1), pages 95-103, April.
    11. Albrecht, Peter, 2003. "Risk measures," Papers 03-01, Sonderforschungsbreich 504.
    12. Geissel Sebastian & Sass Jörn & Seifried Frank Thomas, 2018. "Optimal expected utility risk measures," Statistics & Risk Modeling, De Gruyter, vol. 35(1-2), pages 73-87, January.
    13. Dan A. Iancu & Marek Petrik & Dharmashankar Subramanian, 2015. "Tight Approximations of Dynamic Risk Measures," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 40(3), pages 655-682, March.
    14. Dominique Guegan & Bertrand K Hassani, 2014. "Distortion Risk Measures or the Transformation of Unimodal Distributions into Multimodal Functions," Documents de travail du Centre d'Economie de la Sorbonne 14008, Université Panthéon-Sorbonne (Paris 1), Centre d'Economie de la Sorbonne.
    15. Peng Liu & Tiantian Mao & Ruodu Wang, 2024. "Quantiles under ambiguity and risk sharing," Papers 2412.19546, arXiv.org.
    16. Brandtner, Mario, 2018. "Expected Shortfall, spectral risk measures, and the aggravating effect of background risk, or: risk vulnerability and the problem of subadditivity," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 138-149.
    17. Yi Shen & Zachary Van Oosten & Ruodu Wang, 2024. "Partial Law Invariance and Risk Measures," Papers 2401.17265, arXiv.org, revised Jun 2025.
    18. Nuerxiati Abudurexiti & Kai He & Dongdong Hu & Svetlozar T. Rachev & Hasanjan Sayit & Ruoyu Sun, 2024. "Portfolio analysis with mean-CVaR and mean-CVaR-skewness criteria based on mean–variance mixture models," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 336(1), pages 945-966, May.
    19. Weiwei Li & Dejian Tian, 2023. "Robust optimized certainty equivalents and quantiles for loss positions with distribution uncertainty," Papers 2304.04396, arXiv.org.
    20. Xia Han & Liyuan Lin & Ruodu Wang, 2022. "Diversification quotients: Quantifying diversification via risk measures," Papers 2206.13679, arXiv.org, revised Jul 2024.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2507.13562. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.