IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2312.10883.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Backward stochastic difference equations on lattices with application to market equilibrium analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Masaaki Fukasawa
  • Takashi Sato
  • Jun Sekine

Abstract

We study backward stochastic difference equations (BS{\Delta}E) driven by a d-dimensional stochastic process on a lattice whose increments have only d + 1 possible values that generates the lattice. Regarding the driving process as a d dimensional asset price process, we give applications to an optimal investment problem and a market equilibrium analysis, where utility functionals are defined through BS{\Delta}E.

Suggested Citation

  • Masaaki Fukasawa & Takashi Sato & Jun Sekine, 2023. "Backward stochastic difference equations on lattices with application to market equilibrium analysis," Papers 2312.10883, arXiv.org.
  • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2312.10883
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://arxiv.org/pdf/2312.10883
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Patrick Beissner & Qian Lin & Frank Riedel, 2020. "Dynamically consistent alpha‐maxmin expected utility," Mathematical Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(3), pages 1073-1102, July.
    2. Martin Herdegen & Johannes Muhle-Karbe & Dylan Possamaï, 2021. "Equilibrium asset pricing with transaction costs," Finance and Stochastics, Springer, vol. 25(2), pages 231-275, April.
    3. Lukas Gonon & Johannes Muhle‐Karbe & Xiaofei Shi, 2021. "Asset pricing with general transaction costs: Theory and numerics," Mathematical Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(2), pages 595-648, April.
    4. Bruno Bouchard & Masaaki Fukasawa & Martin Herdegen & Johannes Muhle-Karbe, 2018. "Equilibrium returns with transaction costs," Finance and Stochastics, Springer, vol. 22(3), pages 569-601, July.
    5. Patrick Cheridito & Ulrich Horst & Michael Kupper & Traian A. Pirvu, 2016. "Equilibrium Pricing in Incomplete Markets Under Translation Invariant Preferences," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 41(1), pages 174-195, February.
    6. Johannes Muhle-Karbe & Marcel Nutz & Xiaowei Tan, 2019. "Asset Pricing with Heterogeneous Beliefs and Illiquidity," Papers 1905.05730, arXiv.org, revised Mar 2020.
    7. Stadje, Mitja, 2010. "Extending dynamic convex risk measures from discrete time to continuous time: A convergence approach," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 47(3), pages 391-404, December.
    8. Horst, Ulrich & Pirvu, Traian A. & Dos Reis, Gonçalo, 2010. "On securitization, market completion and equilibrium risk transfer," SFB 649 Discussion Papers 2010-010, Humboldt University Berlin, Collaborative Research Center 649: Economic Risk.
    9. repec:hum:wpaper:sfb649dp2010-010 is not listed on IDEAS
    10. Basak, Suleyman, 2005. "Asset pricing with heterogeneous beliefs," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 29(11), pages 2849-2881, November.
    11. Varian, Hal R, 1985. "Divergence of Opinion in Complete Markets: A Note," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 40(1), pages 309-317, March.
    12. He, Hua & Leland, Hayne, 1993. "On Equilibrium Asset Price Processes," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 6(3), pages 593-617.
    13. Bruno Bouchard & Masaaki Fukasawa & Martin Herdegen & Johannes Muhle-Karbe, 2017. "Equilibrium Returns with Transaction Costs," Papers 1707.08464, arXiv.org, revised Apr 2018.
    14. Johannes Muhle‐Karbe & Marcel Nutz & Xiaowei Tan, 2020. "Asset pricing with heterogeneous beliefs and illiquidity," Mathematical Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(4), pages 1392-1421, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Peter Bank & Ibrahim Ekren & Johannes Muhle‐Karbe, 2021. "Liquidity in competitive dealer markets," Mathematical Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(3), pages 827-856, July.
    2. Johannes Muhle-Karbe & Xiaofei Shi & Chen Yang, 2020. "An Equilibrium Model for the Cross-Section of Liquidity Premia," Papers 2011.13625, arXiv.org.
    3. Martin Herdegen & Johannes Muhle-Karbe & Dylan Possamaï, 2021. "Equilibrium asset pricing with transaction costs," Finance and Stochastics, Springer, vol. 25(2), pages 231-275, April.
    4. Ma, Guiyuan & Siu, Chi Chung & Zhu, Song-Ping, 2022. "Portfolio choice with return predictability and small trading frictions," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 111(C).
    5. Xiaofei Shi & Daran Xu & Zhanhao Zhang, 2023. "Deep learning algorithms for hedging with frictions," Digital Finance, Springer, vol. 5(1), pages 113-147, March.
    6. Alain Bensoussan & Guiyuan Ma & Chi Chung Siu & Sheung Chi Phillip Yam, 2022. "Dynamic mean–variance problem with frictions," Finance and Stochastics, Springer, vol. 26(2), pages 267-300, April.
    7. Xiaofei Shi & Daran Xu & Zhanhao Zhang, 2021. "Deep Learning Algorithms for Hedging with Frictions," Papers 2111.01931, arXiv.org, revised Dec 2022.
    8. Michail Anthropelos & Constantinos Stefanakis, 2024. "Continuous-time Equilibrium Returns in Markets with Price Impact and Transaction Costs," Papers 2405.14418, arXiv.org.
    9. Alessandro Micheli & Johannes Muhle‐Karbe & Eyal Neuman, 2023. "Closed‐loop Nash competition for liquidity," Mathematical Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(4), pages 1082-1118, October.
    10. Masamitsu Ohnishi & Makoto Shimoshimizu, 2022. "Optimal Pair–Trade Execution with Generalized Cross–Impact," Asia-Pacific Financial Markets, Springer;Japanese Association of Financial Economics and Engineering, vol. 29(2), pages 253-289, June.
    11. Jana Bielagk & Arnaud Lionnet & Gonçalo dos Reis, 2015. "Equilibrium pricing under relative performance concerns," Working Papers hal-01245812, HAL.
    12. Hu, Duni & Wang, Hailong, 2024. "Heterogeneous beliefs with preference interdependence and asset pricing," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 93(PA), pages 1-37.
    13. Martin Herdegen & Johannes Muhle-Karbe & Dylan Possamai, 2019. "Equilibrium Asset Pricing with Transaction Costs," Papers 1901.10989, arXiv.org, revised Sep 2020.
    14. Jia, Yun & Yang, Chunpeng, 2017. "Disagreement and the risk-return relation," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 97-104.
    15. Olivier Féron & Peter Tankov & Laura Tinsi, 2020. "Price Formation and Optimal Trading in Intraday Electricity Markets with a Major Player," Risks, MDPI, vol. 8(4), pages 1-21, December.
    16. Philippe Casgrain & Sebastian Jaimungal, 2020. "Mean‐field games with differing beliefs for algorithmic trading," Mathematical Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(3), pages 995-1034, July.
    17. Julien Riposo & Maneesh Gupta, 2024. "A Crypto Yield Model for Staking Return," FinTech, MDPI, vol. 3(1), pages 1-19, February.
    18. Xiao Chen & Jin Hyuk Choi & Kasper Larsen & Duane J. Seppi, 2021. "Learning about latent dynamic trading demand," Papers 2105.13401, arXiv.org, revised Aug 2021.
    19. Hu, Yingyi & Zhao, Tiao & Zhang, Lin, 2020. "Noise trading, institutional trading, and opinion divergence: Evidence on intraday data in the Chinese stock market," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 74-89.
    20. Ulrich Horst & Michael Kupper & Andrea Macrina & Christoph Mainberger, 2013. "Continuous equilibrium in affine and information-based capital asset pricing models," Annals of Finance, Springer, vol. 9(4), pages 725-755, November.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2312.10883. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.