IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2211.06568.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Effective a Posteriori Ratemaking with Large Insurance Portfolios via Surrogate Modeling

Author

Listed:
  • Sebastian Calcetero-Vanegas
  • Andrei L. Badescu
  • X. Sheldon Lin

Abstract

A posteriori ratemaking in insurance uses a Bayesian credibility model to upgrade the current premiums of a contract by taking into account policyholders' attributes and their claim history. Most data-driven models used for this task are mathematically intractable, and premiums must be then obtained through numerical methods such as simulation such MCMC. However, these methods can be computationally expensive and prohibitive for large portfolios when applied at the policyholder level. Additionally, these computations become ``black-box" procedures as there is no expression showing how the claim history of policyholders is used to upgrade their premiums. To address these challenges, this paper proposes the use of a surrogate modeling approach to inexpensively derive a closed-form expression for computing the Bayesian credibility premiums for any given model. As a part of the methodology, the paper introduces the ``credibility index", which is a summary statistic of a policyholder's claim history that serves as the main input of the surrogate model and that is sufficient for several distribution families, including the exponential dispersion family. As a result, the computational burden of a posteriori ratemaking for large portfolios is therefore reduced through the direct evaluation of the closed-form expression, which additionally can provide a transparent and interpretable way of computing Bayesian premiums.

Suggested Citation

  • Sebastian Calcetero-Vanegas & Andrei L. Badescu & X. Sheldon Lin, 2022. "Effective a Posteriori Ratemaking with Large Insurance Portfolios via Surrogate Modeling," Papers 2211.06568, arXiv.org, revised May 2023.
  • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2211.06568
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://arxiv.org/pdf/2211.06568
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yan, Yujie & Song, Kai-Sheng, 2022. "A general optimal approach to Bühlmann credibility theory," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 262-282.
    2. Zhang, Jianjun & Qiu, Chunjuan & Wu, Xianyi, 2018. "Bayesian ratemaking with common effects modeled by mixture of Polya tree processes," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 87-94.
    3. Hong Li & Yang Lu & Wenjun Zhu, 2021. "Dynamic Bayesian Ratemaking: A Markov Chain Approximation Approach," North American Actuarial Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(2), pages 186-205, April.
    4. Mikael Sunnåker & Alberto Giovanni Busetto & Elina Numminen & Jukka Corander & Matthieu Foll & Christophe Dessimoz, 2013. "Approximate Bayesian Computation," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(1), pages 1-10, January.
    5. De Vylder, Fl. & Ballegeer, Y., 1979. "A Numerical Illustration of Optimal Semilinear Credibility," ASTIN Bulletin, Cambridge University Press, vol. 10(2), pages 131-148, March.
    6. Crevecoeur, Jonas & Robben, Jens & Antonio, Katrien, 2022. "A hierarchical reserving model for reported non-life insurance claims," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 158-184.
    7. Jewell, William S., 1974. "Credible Means are exact Bayesian for Exponential Families," ASTIN Bulletin, Cambridge University Press, vol. 8(1), pages 77-90, September.
    8. Lin, X. Sheldon & Yang, Shuai, 2020. "Efficient Dynamic Hedging For Large Variable Annuity Portfolios With Multiple Underlying Assets," ASTIN Bulletin, Cambridge University Press, vol. 50(3), pages 913-957, September.
    9. Lin, X. Sheldon & Yang, Shuai, 2020. "Fast and efficient nested simulation for large variable annuity portfolios: A surrogate modeling approach," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 85-103.
    10. Tzougas, George & Pignatelli di Cerchiara, Alice, 2021. "The multivariate mixed Negative Binomial regression model with an application to insurance a posteriori ratemaking," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 101(PB), pages 602-625.
    11. Kelvin Yau & Karen Yip & H. K. Yuen, 2003. "Modelling repeated insurance claim frequency data using the generalized linear mixed model," Journal of Applied Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 30(8), pages 857-865.
    12. Liqun Diao & Chengguo Weng, 2019. "Regression Tree Credibility Model," North American Actuarial Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(2), pages 169-196, April.
    13. Paul Fearnhead & Dennis Prangle, 2012. "Constructing summary statistics for approximate Bayesian computation: semi-automatic approximate Bayesian computation," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 74(3), pages 419-474, June.
    14. Frees, Edward W. & Valdez, Emiliano A., 2008. "Hierarchical Insurance Claims Modeling," Journal of the American Statistical Association, American Statistical Association, vol. 103(484), pages 1457-1469.
    15. Youn Ahn, Jae & Jeong, Himchan & Lu, Yang, 2021. "On the ordering of credibility factors," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 101(PB), pages 626-638.
    16. Joyce Paul & Marjoram Paul, 2008. "Approximately Sufficient Statistics and Bayesian Computation," Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology, De Gruyter, vol. 7(1), pages 1-18, August.
    17. Xacur, Oscar Alberto Quijano & Garrido, José, 2018. "Bayesian credibility for GLMs," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 180-189.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jonathan U Harrison & Ruth E Baker, 2020. "An automatic adaptive method to combine summary statistics in approximate Bayesian computation," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(8), pages 1-21, August.
    2. Wilkinson Richard David, 2013. "Approximate Bayesian computation (ABC) gives exact results under the assumption of model error," Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology, De Gruyter, vol. 12(2), pages 129-141, May.
    3. D.T. Frazier & G.M. Martin & C.P. Robert & J. Rousseau, 2016. "Asymptotic Properties of Approximate Bayesian Computation," Monash Econometrics and Business Statistics Working Papers 18/16, Monash University, Department of Econometrics and Business Statistics.
    4. Emmanuel Jordy Menvouta & Jolien Ponnet & Robin Van Oirbeek & Tim Verdonck, 2022. "mCube: Multinomial Micro-level reserving Model," Papers 2212.00101, arXiv.org.
    5. Gael M. Martin & David T. Frazier & Christian P. Robert, 2020. "Computing Bayes: Bayesian Computation from 1763 to the 21st Century," Monash Econometrics and Business Statistics Working Papers 14/20, Monash University, Department of Econometrics and Business Statistics.
    6. Runhuan Feng & Peng Li, 2021. "Sample Recycling Method -- A New Approach to Efficient Nested Monte Carlo Simulations," Papers 2106.06028, arXiv.org.
    7. Gael M. Martin & David T. Frazier & Christian P. Robert, 2021. "Approximating Bayes in the 21st Century," Monash Econometrics and Business Statistics Working Papers 24/21, Monash University, Department of Econometrics and Business Statistics.
    8. Baey, Charlotte & Smith, Henrik G. & Rundlöf, Maj & Olsson, Ola & Clough, Yann & Sahlin, Ullrika, 2023. "Calibration of a bumble bee foraging model using Approximate Bayesian Computation," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 477(C).
    9. Prangle Dennis & Fearnhead Paul & Cox Murray P. & Biggs Patrick J. & French Nigel P., 2014. "Semi-automatic selection of summary statistics for ABC model choice," Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology, De Gruyter, vol. 13(1), pages 67-82, February.
    10. Frazier, David T. & Maneesoonthorn, Worapree & Martin, Gael M. & McCabe, Brendan P.M., 2019. "Approximate Bayesian forecasting," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 35(2), pages 521-539.
    11. Buzbas, Erkan O. & Rosenberg, Noah A., 2015. "AABC: Approximate approximate Bayesian computation for inference in population-genetic models," Theoretical Population Biology, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 31-42.
    12. Creel, Michael & Kristensen, Dennis, 2015. "ABC of SV: Limited information likelihood inference in stochastic volatility jump-diffusion models," Journal of Empirical Finance, Elsevier, vol. 31(C), pages 85-108.
    13. Soubeyrand Samuel & Guiton François & Klein Etienne K. & Carpentier Florence, 2013. "Approximate Bayesian computation with functional statistics," Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology, De Gruyter, vol. 12(1), pages 17-37, March.
    14. Mikael Sunnåker & Alberto Giovanni Busetto & Elina Numminen & Jukka Corander & Matthieu Foll & Christophe Dessimoz, 2013. "Approximate Bayesian Computation," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(1), pages 1-10, January.
    15. Warne, David J. & Baker, Ruth E. & Simpson, Matthew J., 2018. "Multilevel rejection sampling for approximate Bayesian computation," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 71-86.
    16. Creel, Michael & Kristensen, Dennis, 2016. "On selection of statistics for approximate Bayesian computing (or the method of simulated moments)," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 99-114.
    17. Nakagome Shigeki & Fukumizu Kenji & Mano Shuhei, 2013. "Kernel approximate Bayesian computation in population genetic inferences," Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology, De Gruyter, vol. 12(6), pages 667-678, December.
    18. Michael Stocks & Mathieu Siol & Martin Lascoux & Stéphane De Mita, 2014. "Amount of Information Needed for Model Choice in Approximate Bayesian Computation," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(6), pages 1-13, June.
    19. Soubeyrand, Samuel & Haon-Lasportes, Emilie, 2015. "Weak convergence of posteriors conditional on maximum pseudo-likelihood estimates and implications in ABC," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 84-92.
    20. Emma Saulnier & Olivier Gascuel & Samuel Alizon, 2017. "Inferring epidemiological parameters from phylogenies using regression-ABC: A comparative study," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(3), pages 1-31, March.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2211.06568. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.