IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2011.01961.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Insights into Fairness through Trust: Multi-scale Trust Quantification for Financial Deep Learning

Author

Listed:
  • Alexander Wong
  • Andrew Hryniowski
  • Xiao Yu Wang

Abstract

The success of deep learning in recent years have led to a significant increase in interest and prevalence for its adoption to tackle financial services tasks. One particular question that often arises as a barrier to adopting deep learning for financial services is whether the developed financial deep learning models are fair in their predictions, particularly in light of strong governance and regulatory compliance requirements in the financial services industry. A fundamental aspect of fairness that has not been explored in financial deep learning is the concept of trust, whose variations may point to an egocentric view of fairness and thus provide insights into the fairness of models. In this study we explore the feasibility and utility of a multi-scale trust quantification strategy to gain insights into the fairness of a financial deep learning model, particularly under different scenarios at different scales. More specifically, we conduct multi-scale trust quantification on a deep neural network for the purpose of credit card default prediction to study: 1) the overall trustworthiness of the model 2) the trust level under all possible prediction-truth relationships, 3) the trust level across the spectrum of possible predictions, 4) the trust level across different demographic groups (e.g., age, gender, and education), and 5) distribution of overall trust for an individual prediction scenario. The insights for this proof-of-concept study demonstrate that such a multi-scale trust quantification strategy may be helpful for data scientists and regulators in financial services as part of the verification and certification of financial deep learning solutions to gain insights into fairness and trust of these solutions.

Suggested Citation

  • Alexander Wong & Andrew Hryniowski & Xiao Yu Wang, 2020. "Insights into Fairness through Trust: Multi-scale Trust Quantification for Financial Deep Learning," Papers 2011.01961, arXiv.org.
  • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2011.01961
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://arxiv.org/pdf/2011.01961
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mark Weber & Giacomo Domeniconi & Jie Chen & Daniel Karl I. Weidele & Claudio Bellei & Tom Robinson & Charles E. Leiserson, 2019. "Anti-Money Laundering in Bitcoin: Experimenting with Graph Convolutional Networks for Financial Forensics," Papers 1908.02591, arXiv.org.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lin, Dan & Wu, Jiajing & Xuan, Qi & Tse, Chi K., 2022. "Ethereum transaction tracking: Inferring evolution of transaction networks via link prediction," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 600(C).
    2. Zeinab Rouhollahi, 2021. "Towards Artificial Intelligence Enabled Financial Crime Detection," Papers 2105.10866, arXiv.org.
    3. Ourania Theodosiadou & Alexandros-Michail Koufakis & Theodora Tsikrika & Stefanos Vrochidis & Ioannis Kompatsiaris, 2023. "Change Point Analysis of Time Series Related to Bitcoin Transactions: Towards the Detection of Illegal Activities," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 16(9), pages 1-20, September.
    4. Wai Weng Lo & Gayan K. Kulatilleke & Mohanad Sarhan & Siamak Layeghy & Marius Portmann, 2022. "Inspection-L: Self-Supervised GNN Node Embeddings for Money Laundering Detection in Bitcoin," Papers 2203.10465, arXiv.org, revised Oct 2022.
    5. Jianian Wang & Sheng Zhang & Yanghua Xiao & Rui Song, 2021. "A Review on Graph Neural Network Methods in Financial Applications," Papers 2111.15367, arXiv.org, revised Apr 2022.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2011.01961. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.