IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/1908.02591.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Anti-Money Laundering in Bitcoin: Experimenting with Graph Convolutional Networks for Financial Forensics

Author

Listed:
  • Mark Weber
  • Giacomo Domeniconi
  • Jie Chen
  • Daniel Karl I. Weidele
  • Claudio Bellei
  • Tom Robinson
  • Charles E. Leiserson

Abstract

Anti-money laundering (AML) regulations play a critical role in safeguarding financial systems, but bear high costs for institutions and drive financial exclusion for those on the socioeconomic and international margins. The advent of cryptocurrency has introduced an intriguing paradox: pseudonymity allows criminals to hide in plain sight, but open data gives more power to investigators and enables the crowdsourcing of forensic analysis. Meanwhile advances in learning algorithms show great promise for the AML toolkit. In this workshop tutorial, we motivate the opportunity to reconcile the cause of safety with that of financial inclusion. We contribute the Elliptic Data Set, a time series graph of over 200K Bitcoin transactions (nodes), 234K directed payment flows (edges), and 166 node features, including ones based on non-public data; to our knowledge, this is the largest labelled transaction data set publicly available in any cryptocurrency. We share results from a binary classification task predicting illicit transactions using variations of Logistic Regression (LR), Random Forest (RF), Multilayer Perceptrons (MLP), and Graph Convolutional Networks (GCN), with GCN being of special interest as an emergent new method for capturing relational information. The results show the superiority of Random Forest (RF), but also invite algorithmic work to combine the respective powers of RF and graph methods. Lastly, we consider visualization for analysis and explainability, which is difficult given the size and dynamism of real-world transaction graphs, and we offer a simple prototype capable of navigating the graph and observing model performance on illicit activity over time. With this tutorial and data set, we hope to a) invite feedback in support of our ongoing inquiry, and b) inspire others to work on this societally important challenge.

Suggested Citation

  • Mark Weber & Giacomo Domeniconi & Jie Chen & Daniel Karl I. Weidele & Claudio Bellei & Tom Robinson & Charles E. Leiserson, 2019. "Anti-Money Laundering in Bitcoin: Experimenting with Graph Convolutional Networks for Financial Forensics," Papers 1908.02591, arXiv.org.
  • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:1908.02591
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://arxiv.org/pdf/1908.02591
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zeinab Rouhollahi, 2021. "Towards Artificial Intelligence Enabled Financial Crime Detection," Papers 2105.10866, arXiv.org.
    2. Wai Weng Lo & Gayan K. Kulatilleke & Mohanad Sarhan & Siamak Layeghy & Marius Portmann, 2022. "Inspection-L: Self-Supervised GNN Node Embeddings for Money Laundering Detection in Bitcoin," Papers 2203.10465, arXiv.org, revised Oct 2022.
    3. Jianian Wang & Sheng Zhang & Yanghua Xiao & Rui Song, 2021. "A Review on Graph Neural Network Methods in Financial Applications," Papers 2111.15367, arXiv.org, revised Apr 2022.
    4. Lin, Dan & Wu, Jiajing & Xuan, Qi & Tse, Chi K., 2022. "Ethereum transaction tracking: Inferring evolution of transaction networks via link prediction," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 600(C).
    5. Alexander Wong & Andrew Hryniowski & Xiao Yu Wang, 2020. "Insights into Fairness through Trust: Multi-scale Trust Quantification for Financial Deep Learning," Papers 2011.01961, arXiv.org.
    6. Ourania Theodosiadou & Alexandros-Michail Koufakis & Theodora Tsikrika & Stefanos Vrochidis & Ioannis Kompatsiaris, 2023. "Change Point Analysis of Time Series Related to Bitcoin Transactions: Towards the Detection of Illegal Activities," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 16(9), pages 1-20, September.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:1908.02591. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.