IDEAS home Printed from
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Optimal Risk Allocation in Reinsurance Networks


  • Nicole Bauerle
  • Alexander Glauner


In this paper we consider reinsurance or risk sharing from a macroeconomic point of view. Our aim is to find socially optimal reinsurance treaties. In our setting we assume that there are $n$ insurance companies each bearing a certain risk and one representative reinsurer. The optimization problem is to minimize the sum of all capital requirements of the insurers where we assume that all insurance companies use a form of Range-Value-at-Risk. We show that in case all insurers use Value-at-Risk and the reinsurer's premium principle satisfies monotonicity, then layer reinsurance treaties are socially optimal. For this result we do not need any dependence structure between the risks. In the general setting with Range-Value-at-Risk we obtain again the optimality of layer reinsurance treaties under further assumptions, in particular under the assumption that the individual risks are positively dependent through the stochastic ordering. At the end, we discuss the difference between socially optimal reinsurance treaties and individually optimal ones by looking at a number of special cases.

Suggested Citation

  • Nicole Bauerle & Alexander Glauner, 2017. "Optimal Risk Allocation in Reinsurance Networks," Papers 1711.10210,
  • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:1711.10210

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL:
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no

    References listed on IDEAS

    1. Cai, Jun & Lemieux, Christiane & Liu, Fangda, 2016. "Optimal Reinsurance from the Perspectives of both an Insurer and a Reinsurer," ASTIN Bulletin: The Journal of the International Actuarial Association, Cambridge University Press, vol. 46(03), pages 815-849, September.
    2. Damir Filipović & Gregor Svindland, 2008. "Optimal capital and risk allocations for law- and cash-invariant convex functions," Finance and Stochastics, Springer, vol. 12(3), pages 423-439, July.
    3. Wang, Shaun & Dhaene, Jan, 1998. "Comonotonicity, correlation order and premium principles," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 22(3), pages 235-242, July.
    4. Cai, Jun & Wei, Wei, 2012. "Optimal reinsurance with positively dependent risks," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 50(1), pages 57-63.
    5. Griselda Deelstra & Guillaume Plantin, 2014. "Risk Theory and Reinsurance," Sciences Po publications info:hdl:2441/2iocb3a6619, Sciences Po.
    6. K. C. Cheung & K. C. J. Sung & S. C. P. Yam, 2014. "Risk-Minimizing Reinsurance Protection For Multivariate Risks," Journal of Risk & Insurance, The American Risk and Insurance Association, vol. 81(1), pages 219-236, March.
    7. Kull, Andreas, 2009. "Sharing Risk – An Economic Perspective," ASTIN Bulletin: The Journal of the International Actuarial Association, Cambridge University Press, vol. 39(02), pages 591-613, November.
    8. Boonen, Tim J. & Tan, Ken Seng & Zhuang, Sheng Chao, 2016. "The role of a representative reinsurer in optimal reinsurance," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 196-204.
    9. Alfred Müller & Marco Scarsini, 2001. "Stochastic Comparison of Random Vectors with a Common Copula," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 26(4), pages 723-740, November.
    10. d'Ursel, L. & Lauwers, M., 1985. "Chains of reinsurance: Non-cooperative equilibria and pareto optimality," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 4(4), pages 279-285, October.
    11. Balbás, Alejandro & Balbás, Beatriz & Heras, Antonio, 2009. "Optimal reinsurance with general risk measures," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 44(3), pages 374-384, June.
    12. Chi, Yichun & Tan, Ken Seng, 2013. "Optimal reinsurance with general premium principles," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 52(2), pages 180-189.
    13. Block, Henry W. & Savits, Thomas H. & Shaked, Moshe, 1985. "A concept of negative dependence using stochastic ordering," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 3(2), pages 81-86, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:


    Access and download statistics


    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:1711.10210. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (arXiv administrators). General contact details of provider: .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.