IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/1609.02395.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Dissecting cross-impact on stock markets: An empirical analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Michael Benzaquen
  • Iacopo Mastromatteo
  • Zoltan Eisler
  • Jean-Philippe Bouchaud

Abstract

The vast majority of market impact studies assess each product individually, and the interactions between the different order flows are disregarded. This strong approximation may lead to an underestimation of trading costs and possible contagion effects. Transactions in fact mediate a significant part of the correlation between different instruments. In turn, liquidity shares the sectorial structure of market correlations, which can be encoded as a set of eigenvalues and eigenvectors. We introduce a multivariate linear propagator model that successfully describes such a structure, and accounts for a significant fraction of the covariance of stock returns. We dissect the various dynamical mechanisms that contribute to the joint dynamics of assets. We also define two simplified models with substantially less parameters in order to reduce overfitting, and show that they have superior out-of-sample performance.

Suggested Citation

  • Michael Benzaquen & Iacopo Mastromatteo & Zoltan Eisler & Jean-Philippe Bouchaud, 2016. "Dissecting cross-impact on stock markets: An empirical analysis," Papers 1609.02395, arXiv.org, revised Nov 2016.
    • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:1609.02395
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://arxiv.org/pdf/1609.02395
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jean-Philippe Bouchaud & J. Doyne Farmer & Fabrizio Lillo, 2008. "How markets slowly digest changes in supply and demand," Papers 0809.0822, arXiv.org.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Iacopo Mastromatteo & Michael Benzaquen & Zoltan Eisler & Jean-Philippe Bouchaud, 2017. "Trading Lightly: Cross-Impact and Optimal Portfolio Execution," Papers 1702.03838, arXiv.org, revised Aug 2017.
    2. Seungki Min & Costis Maglaras & Ciamac C. Moallemi, 2018. "Cross-Sectional Variation of Intraday Liquidity, Cross-Impact, and their Effect on Portfolio Execution," Papers 1811.05524, arXiv.org.
    3. Shanshan Wang, 2017. "Trading strategies for stock pairs regarding to the cross-impact cost," Papers 1701.03098, arXiv.org, revised Jul 2017.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gianbiagio Curato & Jim Gatheral & Fabrizio Lillo, 2014. "Optimal execution with nonlinear transient market impact," Papers 1412.4839, arXiv.org.
    2. Juan C. Henao-Londono & Sebastian M. Krause & Thomas Guhr, 2021. "Price response functions and spread impact in correlated financial markets," The European Physical Journal B: Condensed Matter and Complex Systems, Springer;EDP Sciences, vol. 94(4), pages 1-20, April.
    3. Sabrina Camargo & Silvio M. Duarte Queiros & Celia Anteneodo, 2013. "Bridging stylized facts in finance and data non-stationarities," Papers 1302.3197, arXiv.org, revised May 2013.
    4. Nicolas Huth & Frédéric Abergel, 2012. "The times change: multivariate subordination, empirical facts," Post-Print hal-00620841, HAL.
    5. B. Tóth & F. Lillo & J. D. Farmer, 2010. "Segmentation algorithm for non-stationary compound Poisson processes," The European Physical Journal B: Condensed Matter and Complex Systems, Springer;EDP Sciences, vol. 78(2), pages 235-243, November.
    6. Ban Zheng & François Roueff & Frédéric Abergel, 2014. "Ergodicity and scaling limit of a constrained multivariate Hawkes process," Post-Print hal-00777941, HAL.
    7. Thibault Jaisson, 2014. "Market impact as anticipation of the order flow imbalance," Papers 1402.1288, arXiv.org.
    8. Stephan Grimm & Thomas Guhr, 2019. "How spread changes affect the order book: comparing the price responses of order deletions and placements to trades," The European Physical Journal B: Condensed Matter and Complex Systems, Springer;EDP Sciences, vol. 92(6), pages 1-11, June.
    9. Weibing Huang & Charles-Albert Lehalle & Mathieu Rosenbaum, 2015. "Simulating and Analyzing Order Book Data: The Queue-Reactive Model," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 110(509), pages 107-122, March.
    10. Campbell, Michael J., 2022. "Heavy-tailed distributions of volume and price-change resulting from strategy coordination and decision noise," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 607(C).
    11. Michael Benzaquen & Jean-Philippe Bouchaud, 2017. "A fractional reaction-diffusion description of supply and demand," Papers 1704.02638, arXiv.org, revised Aug 2017.
    12. B. Tóth & Z. Eisler & F. Lillo & J. Kockelkoren & J.-P. Bouchaud & J.D. Farmer, 2012. "How does the market react to your order flow?," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 12(7), pages 1015-1024, May.
    13. Rama Cont & Adrien De Larrard, 2011. "Price dynamics in a Markovian limit order market," Papers 1104.4596, arXiv.org.
    14. repec:hal:wpaper:hal-00777941 is not listed on IDEAS
    15. Jonathan A. Ch'avez-Casillas & Jos'e E. Figueroa-L'opez, 2014. "One-level limit order book models with memory and variable spread," Papers 1407.5684, arXiv.org, revised Mar 2016.
    16. Michele Vodret & Bence Tóth & Iacopo Mastromatteo & Michael Benzaquen, 2022. "Do fundamentals shape the price response? A critical assessment of linear impact models," Post-Print hal-03797375, HAL.
    17. M. Cristelli & V. Alfi & L. Pietronero & A. Zaccaria, 2010. "Liquidity crisis, granularity of the order book and price fluctuations," The European Physical Journal B: Condensed Matter and Complex Systems, Springer;EDP Sciences, vol. 73(1), pages 41-49, January.
    18. Rama Cont & Sasha Stoikov & Rishi Talreja, 2010. "A Stochastic Model for Order Book Dynamics," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 58(3), pages 549-563, June.
    19. Jasmina Hasanhodzic & Andrew Lo & Emanuele Viola, 2011. "A computational view of market efficiency," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 11(7), pages 1043-1050.
    20. Geoff Willis, 2011. "Pricing, liquidity and the control of dynamic systems in finance and economics," Papers 1105.5503, arXiv.org.
    21. Li-Xin Wang, 2014. "Dynamical Models of Stock Prices Based on Technical Trading Rules Part I: The Models," Papers 1401.1888, arXiv.org, revised Feb 2016.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:1609.02395. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.