IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/1511.03704.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Foundations for Wash Sales

Author

Listed:
  • Phillip G. Bradford

Abstract

Consider an ephemeral sale-and-repurchase of a security resulting in the same position before the sale and after the repurchase. A sale-and-repurchase is a wash sale if these transactions result in a loss within $\pm 30$ calendar days. Since a portfolio is essentially the same after a wash sale, any tax advantage from such a loss is not allowed. That is, after a wash sale a portfolio is unchanged so any loss captured by the wash sale is deemed to be solely for tax advantage and not investment purposes. This paper starts by exploring variations of the birthday problem to model wash sales. The birthday problem is: Determine the number of independent and identically distributed random variables required so there is a probability of at least 1/2 that two or more of these random variables share the same outcome. This paper gives necessary conditions for wash sales based on variations on the birthday problem. This allows us to answer questions such as: What is the likelihood of a wash sale in an unmanaged portfolio where purchases and sales are independent, uniform, and random? This paper ends by exploring the Littlewood-Offord problem as it relates capital gains and losses with wash sales.

Suggested Citation

  • Phillip G. Bradford, 2015. "Foundations for Wash Sales," Papers 1511.03704, arXiv.org, revised Jun 2016.
    • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:1511.03704
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://arxiv.org/pdf/1511.03704
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. ,, 1998. "Problems And Solutions," Econometric Theory, Cambridge University Press, vol. 14(1), pages 151-159, February.
    2. ,, 1998. "Problems And Solutions," Econometric Theory, Cambridge University Press, vol. 14(5), pages 687-698, October.
    3. Astrup Jensen, Bjarne & Marekwica, Marcel, 2011. "Optimal portfolio choice with wash sale constraints," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 35(11), pages 1916-1937.
    4. ,, 1998. "Problems And Solutions," Econometric Theory, Cambridge University Press, vol. 14(3), pages 381-386, June.
    5. ,, 1998. "Problems And Solutions," Econometric Theory, Cambridge University Press, vol. 14(4), pages 525-537, August.
    6. ,, 1998. "Problems And Solutions," Econometric Theory, Cambridge University Press, vol. 14(2), pages 285-292, April.
    7. Kazuo Nishimura & Masaaki Sibuya, 1988. "Occupancy with two types of balls," Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Springer;The Institute of Statistical Mathematics, vol. 40(1), pages 77-91, March.
    8. Michael N. Katehakis & Arthur F. Veinott, 1987. "The Multi-Armed Bandit Problem: Decomposition and Computation," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 12(2), pages 262-268, May.
    9. Wendl, Michael C., 2003. "Collision probability between sets of random variables," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 64(3), pages 249-254, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Derek Liu & Francesco Piccoli & Katie Chen & Adrina Tang & Victor Fang, 2023. "NFT Wash Trading Detection," Papers 2305.01543, arXiv.org.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Allen C. Goodman & Miron Stano, 2000. "Hmos and Health Externalities: A Local Public Good Perspective," Public Finance Review, , vol. 28(3), pages 247-269, May.
    2. Bettina Campedelli & Andrea Guerrina & Giulia Romano & Chiara Leardini, 2014. "La performance della rete ospedaliera pubblica della regione Veneto. L?impatto delle variabili ambientali e operative sull?efficienza," MECOSAN, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2014(92), pages 119-142.
    3. Penn Loh & Zoë Ackerman & Joceline Fidalgo & Rebecca Tumposky, 2022. "Co-Education/Co-Research Partnership: A Critical Approach to Co-Learning between Dudley Street Neighborhood Initiative and Tufts University," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-17, February.
    4. O'Brien, Raymond & Patacchini, Eleonora, 2003. "Testing the exogeneity assumption in panel data models with "non classical" disturbances," Discussion Paper Series In Economics And Econometrics 0302, Economics Division, School of Social Sciences, University of Southampton.
    5. YongSeog Kim & W. Nick Street & Gary J. Russell & Filippo Menczer, 2005. "Customer Targeting: A Neural Network Approach Guided by Genetic Algorithms," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 51(2), pages 264-276, February.
    6. Yanling Li & Zita Oravecz & Shuai Zhou & Yosef Bodovski & Ian J. Barnett & Guangqing Chi & Yuan Zhou & Naomi P. Friedman & Scott I. Vrieze & Sy-Miin Chow, 2022. "Bayesian Forecasting with a Regime-Switching Zero-Inflated Multilevel Poisson Regression Model: An Application to Adolescent Alcohol Use with Spatial Covariates," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 87(2), pages 376-402, June.
    7. Oscar J. Cacho & Robyn L. Hean & Russell M. Wise, 2003. "Carbon‐accounting methods and reforestation incentives," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 47(2), pages 153-179, June.
    8. Walter M. Cadette, 1999. "Financing Long-Term Care: Options for Policy," Economics Working Paper Archive wp_283, Levy Economics Institute.
    9. Eggli, Yves & Halfon, Patricia & Chikhi, Mehdi & Bandi, Till, 2006. "Ambulatory healthcare information system: A conceptual framework," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 78(1), pages 26-38, August.
    10. M. A. Noor & E.A. Al-Said, 2002. "Finite-Difference Method for a System of Third-Order Boundary-Value Problems," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 112(3), pages 627-637, March.
    11. Yong He & Zhiyi Tan, 2002. "Ordinal On-Line Scheduling for Maximizing the Minimum Machine Completion Time," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 6(2), pages 199-206, June.
    12. Henderson, James E. & Dunn, Michael A., 2007. "Investigating the Potential of Fee-Based Recreation on Private Lands in the Lower Mississippi River Delta," 2007 Annual Meeting, February 4-7, 2007, Mobile, Alabama 34822, Southern Agricultural Economics Association.
    13. Eike Quilling & Birgit Babitsch & Kevin Dadaczynski & Stefanie Kruse & Maja Kuchler & Heike Köckler & Janna Leimann & Ulla Walter & Christina Plantz, 2020. "Municipal Health Promotion as Part of Urban Health: A Policy Framework for Action," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(16), pages 1-10, August.
    14. Haeringer, Guillaume & Klijn, Flip, 2009. "Constrained school choice," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 144(5), pages 1921-1947, September.
    15. Alireza Nili & Mary Tate & David Johnstone, 2019. "The process of solving problems with self-service technologies: a study from the user’s perspective," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 19(2), pages 373-407, June.
    16. Chein-Shan Liu & Zhuojia Fu & Chung-Lun Kuo, 2017. "Directional Method of Fundamental Solutions for Three-dimensional Laplace Equation," Journal of Mathematics Research, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 9(6), pages 112-123, December.
    17. Ali Akgül & Esra Karatas Akgül & Dumitru Baleanu & Mustafa Inc, 2018. "New Numerical Method for Solving Tenth Order Boundary Value Problems," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 6(11), pages 1-9, November.
    18. Li, Haitao & Womer, Norman K., 2015. "Solving stochastic resource-constrained project scheduling problems by closed-loop approximate dynamic programming," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 246(1), pages 20-33.
    19. José Sánchez Maldonado & Salvador Gómez Sala, 2006. "The Reform of Indirect Taxation in Spain: VAT and Excise," International Center for Public Policy Working Paper Series, at AYSPS, GSU paper0607, International Center for Public Policy, Andrew Young School of Policy Studies, Georgia State University.
    20. Georgios Marinakos & Sophia Daskalaki, 2017. "Imbalanced customer classification for bank direct marketing," Journal of Marketing Analytics, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 5(1), pages 14-30, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:1511.03704. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.