IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ajf/louvlr/2018003.html

The Disposition Effect does not survive disclosure of expected price trends

Author

Listed:
  • Corneille, Olivier
  • De Winne, Rudy
  • D'Hondt, Catherine

Abstract

The disposition effect (DE) consists in investors’ preference for realizing gains over losses. One DE account suggests that this bias stems from a belief in mean-reverting prices. This account, however, was ruled out by Weber and Camerer (1998), who reported a DE when participants were presumably made aware of expected price trends. In two experiments, we revisited this widely cited study (i) by fully disclosing clear and complete information about asset price distributions, and (ii) by assessing the DE on more reliable measures. In Experiment 1, under conditions of full disclosure, a DE was replicated on Weber and Camerer (1998)’s measures but was not found on the more reliable measures. Experiment 2, which was high-powered and offered higher incentives, confirmed these findings. We conclude that the belief in mean-reverting prices cannot be ruled out as a contributing factor to DE. As additional insights, both experiments reveal that participants showed little convergence to optimal portfolio and diversified their portfolios even when diversification was sparsely effective.
(This abstract was borrowed from another version of this item.)

Suggested Citation

  • Corneille, Olivier & De Winne, Rudy & D'Hondt, Catherine, 2018. "The Disposition Effect does not survive disclosure of expected price trends," LIDAM Reprints LFIN 2018003, Université catholique de Louvain, Louvain Finance (LFIN).
  • Handle: RePEc:ajf:louvlr:2018003
    Note: In : Journal of behavioral and experimental finance, Vol. 20, p. 80-91 (2018)
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a
    for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Other versions of this item:

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Cheung, Stephen L. & Rogut, Nathan, 2024. "Portfolio framing and diversification in a disposition effect experiment," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, Elsevier, vol. 44(C).
    2. Bachmann, Kremena, 2024. "Do you have a choice?: Implications for belief updating and the disposition effect," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    3. Stephen L Cheung, 2024. "A meta-analysis of disposition effect experiments," Working Papers 2024-02, University of Sydney, School of Economics.
    4. Guenther, Benno & Lordan, Grace, 2023. "When the disposition effect proves to be rational: experimental evidence from professional traders," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 118353, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • G4 - Financial Economics - - Behavioral Finance
    • G11 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Portfolio Choice; Investment Decisions

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ajf:louvlr:2018003. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Séverine De Visscher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/lfuclbe.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.