IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/uerssr/333513.html

Economic Evaluation of Beltwide Boll Weevil/Cotton Insect Management Programs (Appendix B)

Author

Listed:
  • Economic Evaluation Team, USDA Interagency Working Group on Boll Weevil Programs

Abstract

Alternative boll weevil/cotton insect management programs were evaluated for their effects on net market benefits and for their distributive impacts on producers and consumers. The Optimum Pest Management with No incentives and Boll Weevil Eradication (OPM-NI-BWE) program produced the highest net market program costs. Consumer benefits from lower prices greatly exceeded the loss of producer incomes and public costs. The Optimum Pest Management with No Incentive (OPM-NI) program produced the highest rate of return on Federal investment. A B/C ratio of 44:1 was obtained, compared with 17:1 for OPM-NI-BWE.

Suggested Citation

  • Economic Evaluation Team, USDA Interagency Working Group on Boll Weevil Programs, 1981. "Economic Evaluation of Beltwide Boll Weevil/Cotton Insect Management Programs (Appendix B)," Staff Reports 333513, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:uerssr:333513
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.333513
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/333513/files/AGESS810518.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.333513?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mann, Jitendar S., 1977. "Techniques To Measure Social Benefits And Costs In Agriculture: A Survey," Journal of Agricultural Economics Research, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, vol. 29(4), pages 1-12, October.
    2. Currie, John Martin & Murphy, John A & Schmitz, Andrew, 1971. "The Concept of Economic Surplus and its Use in Economic Analysis," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 81(324), pages 741-799, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hussen, Ahmed M., 1979. "Assessment Of The Economic And Social Impacts Of Agricultural Technology: A Case Study," Western Journal of Agricultural Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 4(2), pages 1-16, December.
    2. De Groote, Hugo & Gharib, Mariam & Cairns, Jill E. & Olsen, Michael S., 2023. "Economic analysis of 50% non-pollinating (FNP) maize varieties, a promising new seed production technology for Africa," 2023 Seventh AAAE/60th AEASA Conference, September 18-21, 2023, Durban, South Africa 364817, African Association of Agricultural Economists (AAAE).
    3. Lilyan Fulginiti & Richard Perrin, 2005. "Productivity and Welfare," Journal of Productivity Analysis, Springer, vol. 24(2), pages 133-155, October.
    4. Richard Pomfret, 1978. "The economic consequences for Israel of free trade in manufactured goods with the EEC," Review of World Economics (Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv), Springer;Institut für Weltwirtschaft (Kiel Institute for the World Economy), vol. 114(3), pages 526-539, September.
    5. Loehman, Edna T., 1991. "Alternative Measures of Benefit for Nonmarket Goods Which are Substitutes or Complements for Market Goods," Working Papers 115913, Regional Research Project NE-165 Private Strategies, Public Policies, and Food System Performance.
    6. Kunkel, David E. & Gonzales, Leonardo A. & Hiwatig, Mario H., 1977. "Application Of Mathematical Programming Models Simulating Competitive Market Equilibrium For Agricultural Policy And Planning Analysis," 1977 Occasional Paper Series No. 1 190948, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    7. Jeffrey T. LaFrance, 1990. "Incomplete Demand Systems And Semilogarithmic Demand Models," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 34(2), pages 118-131, August.
    8. Javelosa, Josyline C. & Schmitz, Andrew, 2006. "Costs and Benefits of a WTO Dispute: Philippine Bananas and the Australian Market," Estey Centre Journal of International Law and Trade Policy, Estey Centre for Law and Economics in International Trade, vol. 7(01), pages 1-26.
    9. Bale, Malcolm D. & Lutz, Ernst, 1981. "Agricultural Pricing Policies in Developed and Developing Countries: Their Effects on Efficiency, Distribution, and Rural Change," 1981 Occasional Paper Series No. 2 197129, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    10. Buxton, Boyd M. & Hammond, Jerome W., 1973. "Social Cost Of The Dairy Price Support Program," Staff Papers 13738, University of Minnesota, Department of Applied Economics.
    11. Walter Hettich, 1976. "Distribution in Benefit-Cost Analysis: A Review of Theoretical Issues," Public Finance Review, , vol. 4(2), pages 123-150, April.
    12. Randall, Alan, 1982. "Economic Surplus Concepts and Their Use in Benefit Cost Analysis," Review of Marketing and Agricultural Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 50(02), pages 1-29, August.
    13. Hess, S. & Kleinschmit, D. & Theuvsen, L. & von Cramon-Taubadel, S. & Zschache, U., . "A Discourse Analysis Approach to Explain the Path Dependency of Seasonal Farm Labour Regulations in Germany," Proceedings “Schriften der Gesellschaft für Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaften des Landbaues e.V.”, German Association of Agricultural Economists (GEWISOLA), vol. 44.
    14. Fischer, Martin L. & Hammond, Jerome W. & Dahl, Dale C., 1981. "Impacts Of Farm Supply Cooperatives On Oligopolistic Farm Input Markets: A Theoretical Analysis," Staff Papers 13746, University of Minnesota, Department of Applied Economics.
    15. Scobie, Grant M., 1976. "Who Benefits From Agricultural Research?," Review of Marketing and Agricultural Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 44(04), pages 1-6, December.
    16. Jarrett, Frank G. & Lindner, Robert K., 1977. "Research Benefits Revisited," Review of Marketing and Agricultural Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 45(04), pages 1-12, December.
    17. Sinden, Jack A., 1978. "Estimation Of Consumer'S Surplus Values For Land Policies," Australian Journal of Agricultural Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 22(2-3), pages 1-19, August.
    18. Hubbard, Carmen & Thomson, Kenneth J., 2007. "Romania's accession to the EU: Short-term welfare effects on food consumers," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 32(1), pages 128-140, February.
    19. John O.S. Kennedy, 1980. "On The Derivation Of Indifference Curves For Estimating Consumer Surplus," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 24(3), pages 291-295, December.
    20. Gregor Schwerhoff & Ottmar Edenhofer & Marc Fleurbaey, 2020. "Taxation Of Economic Rents," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(2), pages 398-423, April.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:uerssr:333513. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ersgvus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.