IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/uerser/307992.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Analysis of Policies to Conserve Soil and Reduce Surplus Crop Production

Author

Listed:
  • Economic Research Service

Abstract

Long-term acreage retirement and conservation-oriented commodity programs have potential for increasing soil conservation while reducing surplus crop production. Current commodity programs tend to discourage conservation. Retirement of land eroding at the highest rates would save the most soil but cost the Government more than other retirement options. Retirement of surplus crop acres targeted to highly erodible land could be cost-effective for both conservation and commodity program objectives. Cross-compliance would not promise widespread conservation benefits and might reduce commodity program effectiveness, but compliance incentives and modest changes in commodity programs could complement other soil protection measures.

Suggested Citation

  • Economic Research Service, 1985. "Analysis of Policies to Conserve Soil and Reduce Surplus Crop Production," Agricultural Economic Reports 307992, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:uerser:307992
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.307992
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/307992/files/aer534.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.307992?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bills, Nelson L. & Heimlich, Ralph E., 1984. "Assessing Erosion on U.S. Cropland: Land Management and Physical Features," Agricultural Economic Reports 307957, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    2. Reichelderfer, Katherine H., 1985. "Do USDA Farm Program Participants Contribute to Soil Erosion?," Agricultural Economic Reports 307990, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Young, C. Edwin & Osborn, C. Tim, 1990. "The Conservation Reserve Program: An Economic Assessment," Agricultural Economic Reports 308084, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    2. Ogg, Clayton W., 1985. "Acreage Reduction Options In The 1985 Farm Bill Proposals," 1985 Annual Meeting, August 4-7, Ames, Iowa 278594, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    3. Heimlich, Ralph E., 1989. "Productivity and Erodibility of U.S. Cropland," Agricultural Economic Reports 308067, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Heimlich, Ralph E., 1985. "Sodbusting: Land Use Change and Farm Programs," Agricultural Economic Reports 307993, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    2. Gregory L. Poe & Richard M. Klemme & Shawn J. McComb & John E. Ambrosious, 1991. "Commodity Programs and the Internalization of Erosion Costs: Do They Affect Crop Rotation Decisions?," Review of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 13(2), pages 223-235.
    3. Colacicco, D. & Barbarika, A. Jr. & Langner, L., 1987. "Conservation Benefits Of The Usda'S 1983 Payment-In-Kind And Acreage Reduction Programs," Staff Reports 277908, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    4. Reichelderfer, Katherine H., 1985. "Do USDA Farm Program Participants Contribute to Soil Erosion?," Agricultural Economic Reports 307990, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    5. Dicks, Michael R., 1987. "Definitional Consistency for Conservation Provisions of the 1985 Food Security Act," Staff Reports 277929, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    6. Unknown, 2007. "Estimating Water Quality, Air Quality, and Soil Carbon Benefits of the Conservation Reserve Program," FAPRI-MU Report Series 44777, Food and Agricultural Policy Research Institute (FAPRI).
    7. Gordon C. Rausser, 1992. "Predatory versus Productive Government: The Case of U.S. Agricultural Policies," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 6(3), pages 133-157, Summer.
    8. Cattaneo, Andrea & Claassen, Roger & Johansson, Robert C. & Weinberg, Marca, 2005. "Flexible Conservation Measures on Working Land: What Challenges Lie Ahead?," Economic Research Report 7248, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    9. Nielsen, Elizabeth G. & Miranowski, John A. & Morehart, Mitchell J, 1989. "Investments in Soil Conservation and Land Improvements: Factors Explaining Farmers' Decisions," Agricultural Economic Reports 308064, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    10. Konyar, Kazim & McCormick, Ian & Osborn, Tim, 1993. "The U.S. Agricultural Resources Model (USARM): Model Documentation," Staff Reports 278704, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    11. Heimlich, Ralph E., 1985. "Characteristics Of Landowners Converting Land In The Western Great Plains, 1975-1977," Staff Reports 277683, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    12. Economic Research Service, 1985. "Agricultural-Food Policy Review: Commodity Program Perspectives," Agricultural Economic Reports 307974, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    13. Claassen, Roger & Hansen, LeRoy T. & Peters, Mark & Breneman, Vincent E. & Weinberg, Marca & Cattaneo, Andrea & Feather, Peter & Gadsby, Dwight M. & Hellerstein, Daniel & Hopkins, Jeffrey W. & Johnsto, 2001. "Agri-Environmental Policy at the Crossroads: Guideposts on a Changing Landscape," Agricultural Economic Reports 33983, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    14. Heimlich, Ralph E. & Langner, Linda L., 1986. "Swampbusting: Wetland Conversion and Farm Programs," Agricultural Economic Reports 308005, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    15. Glaser, Lewrene K., 1986. "Provisions of the Food Security Act of 1985," Agricultural Information Bulletins 309344, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    16. Claassen, Roger & Breneman, Vincent E. & Bucholtz, Shawn & Cattaneo, Andrea & Johansson, Robert C. & Morehart, Mitchell J., 2004. "Environmental Compliance In U.S. Agricultural Policy: Past Performance And Future Potential," Agricultural Economic Reports 34033, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    17. Hyberg, Bengt & Pascoe, Sean, 1991. "Agriculture And Environmental Policy: Recent United States And Australian Developments," Northeastern Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics Association, vol. 20(1), pages 1-10, April.
    18. Tweeten, Luther G., 1985. "Are Current U.S. Farm Commodity Programs Outdated? Arguments In The Affirmative," Western Journal of Agricultural Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 10(2), pages 1-11, December.
    19. Ervin, David & Algozin, Kenneth & Carey, Marc & Doering, Otto & Frerichs, Stephen & Heimlich, Ralph & Hrubovcak, Jum & Konyar, Kazim & McCormick, Ian & Osborn, Tim & Ribaudo, Marc & Shoemaker, Robbin, 1991. "Conservation and Environmental Issues in Agriculture: An Economic Evaluation of Policy Options," Staff Reports 278567, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    20. Economic Research Service, 1986. "An Economic Analysis of USDA Erosion Control Programs: A New Perspective," Agricultural Economic Reports 308012, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:uerser:307992. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ersgvus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.