IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/uerser/305729.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Food Cost Review, 1992

Author

Listed:
  • Dunham, Denis

Abstract

Food prices, as measured by the Consumer Price Index (CPI), increased 1.2 percent in 1992, less than half the 1991 price increase of 2.9 percent . The 1992 increase was the lowest since 1967, when the index rose 0.9 percent. Higher charges for processing and distribution mainly accounted for the 1992 increase. The prices farmers received for commodities, as measured by the farm value of USDA's market basket of foods, declined 2.5 percent. The farm value share of the food dollar spent in grocery stores in 1992 was 26 percent, down from 27 percent in 1991. The farm-to-retail price spread of USDA’s market basket of foods rose 2 percent, partly reflecting higher prices of inputs, such as labor.

Suggested Citation

  • Dunham, Denis, 1993. "Food Cost Review, 1992," Agricultural Economic Reports 305729, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:uerser:305729
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.305729
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/305729/files/aer672.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.305729?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Brester, Gary W. & Marsh, John M., 2001. "The Effects Of U.S. Meat Packing And Livestock Production Technologies On Marketing Margins And Prices," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 26(2), pages 1-18, December.
    2. Richards, Timothy J. & Kagan, Albert & Gao, Xiaoming, 1997. "Factors Influencing Changes In Potato And Potato Substitute Demand," Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics Association, vol. 26(1), pages 1-15, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:uerser:305729. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ersgvus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.