IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/rutfwp/18170.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Public Perceptions Of Agricultural Biotechnology: A Survey Of New Jersey Residents

Author

Listed:
  • Hallman, William K.
  • Metcalfe, Jennifer

Abstract

Biotechnology is expected to produce significant economic and environmental benefits as a result of the development of new varieties of plants and animals and improved agricultural productivity. Seen by many as a key technology for the 21st century, and as an economic stimulus for the State of New Jersey and for the Nation, biotechnology has been the subject of intense scientific and public debate. Yet, while experts and activists continue to argue, genetic engineering techniques are already leading to agricultural products that may soon be on supermarket shelves.

Suggested Citation

  • Hallman, William K. & Metcalfe, Jennifer, 1994. "Public Perceptions Of Agricultural Biotechnology: A Survey Of New Jersey Residents," Research Reports 18170, Rutgers University, Food Policy Institute.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:rutfwp:18170
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.18170
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/18170/files/pa94ha01.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.18170?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hallman, William K. & Adelaja, Adesoji O. & Schilling, Brian J. & Lang, John T., 2002. "Public Perceptions Of Genetically Modified Foods: Americans Know Not What They Eat," Research Reports 18176, Rutgers University, Food Policy Institute.
    2. Schilling, Brian J. & Hallman, William K. & Adelaja, Adesoji O. & Marxen, Lucas J., 2002. "Consumer Knowledge Of Food Biotechnology: A Descriptive Study Of U.S. Residents," Research Reports 18183, Rutgers University, Food Policy Institute.
    3. Ganiere, Pierre & Chern, Wen S. & Hahn, David E., 2004. "Who Are Proponents And Opponents Of Genetically Modified Foods In The United States?," Working Papers 28315, Ohio State University, Department of Agricultural, Environmental and Development Economics.
    4. Ganiere, Pierre & Chern, Wen S. & Hahn, David E. & Chiang, Fu-Sung, 2004. "´╗┐Consumer Attitudes towards Genetically Modified Foods in Emerging Markets: The Impact of Labeling in Taiwan," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 7(3), pages 1-20.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:rutfwp:18170. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fprutus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.