IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/rffdps/10585.html

Productivity Trends in the Natural Resource Industries

Author

Listed:
  • Parry, Ian W.H.

Abstract

This paper examines multi-factor productivity trends in the U.S. petroleum, coal, copper and logging industries since 1970. Measures of multi-factor productivity growth are negative for all four industries during the 1970's. At the time this led to fears that stocks of natural resources were being exhausted, and this might hinder future economic growth. However in retrospect the 1970's look like an exceptional period, rather than marking a change in long run productivity trends. The decline in measured multi-factor productivity in that decade appear to be explained by a number of special factors that generally have a transitory rather than a permanent effect on productivity growth. For example, the rise in natural resource prices encouraged the entry of relatively inefficient producers. New environmental and health & safety regulations were phased in during the period that also reduce measured multi-factor productivity. Over the last 15 years however, productivity measures have improved significantly in all the industries. For example, we estimate that the level of productivity in 1992 was around 75% higher in the petroleum industry than at the trough of the productivity slowdown, and around 60% higher in coal and copper. To some extent these improvements represent restructuring and consolidation in response to falling output prices. However, technological developments have also played an important role in all four industries.

Suggested Citation

  • Parry, Ian W.H., 1997. "Productivity Trends in the Natural Resource Industries," Discussion Papers 10585, Resources for the Future.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:rffdps:10585
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.10585
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/10585/files/dp970039.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.10585?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Tilton, John E. & Landsberg, Hans H., 1997. "Innovation, Productivity Growth, and the Survival of the U.S. Copper Industry," Discussion Papers 10534, Resources for the Future.
    2. Krautkraemer, Jeffrey, 2005. "Economics of Natural Resource Scarcity: The State of the Debate," RFF Working Paper Series dp-05-14, Resources for the Future.
    3. Warren, Paul & De Simone, Giuseppe, 2014. "Fuelling the future?," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 74(S1), pages 5-15.
    4. Darmstadter, Joel, 1997. "Productivity Changes in U.S. Coal Mining," RFF Working Paper Series dp-97-40, Resources for the Future.
    5. Darmstadter, Joel & Kropp, Brian, 1997. "Productivity Change in U.S. Coal Mining," Discussion Papers 10874, Resources for the Future.
    6. Chakravorty, Ujjayant & Magné, Bertrand & Moreaux, Michel, 2006. "Can Nuclear Power solve the Global Warming Problem?," IDEI Working Papers 381, Institut d'Économie Industrielle (IDEI), Toulouse.
    7. Hsu, Esher, 2002. "加入 Wto 後兩岸農業交流 對台灣農業之影響," Conference papers 330961, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:rffdps:10585. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/rffffus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.