IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/pugtwp/333244.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Economic and social effects of a possible trade agreement between Latin America and Asia Pacific

Author

Listed:
  • Durán Lima, José Elías
  • Aguiar, Angel
  • Ronzheimer, Ira

Abstract

In sum, the work presented here calibrates a computable general equilibrium model for 41 economies and 39 sectors, disaggregating in the first place Latin American and Asian Pacific member countries of the Asia Pacific Cooperation Forum (FOCALAE), in order to simulate the possible effects of a bi-regional agreement between Latin America and Asia Pacific. In this regard, the possible economic and social impacts at the level of economic sectors and winning and/or losing countries will be identified. The underlying study is based on bilateral trade in the year 2017, the effective tariff protection for the nearest available year (2018) and considers the state of trade policy as of December 2020. Based on that, bilateral tariff cuts between Latin American and Asia Pacific countries are modeled. Furthermore, additional analyses are conducted to evaluate derivative effects on economic agents, mainly on SMEs exporting companies. Overall, the results indicate a positive impact on output, trade and welfare. The signing of a large bi-regional agreement yields an expected change in GDP between 0.35 and 0.6% for Latin America and the Caribbean, and a change between 0.46% and 1% for Asia Pacific, whereby increases in consumer welfare depend on the assumption of full employment or unemployment. The agreement is also expected to lead to welfare gains in all the countries considered, and a reduction in unemployment of 1.7% on average among Latin American and Caribbean countries, and 3% in Asia Pacific. If the RCEP mega-agreement is signed without Latin America signing any agreement with Asia Pacific, welfare losses and trade detour in Latin America and the Caribbean are to be expected. These are likely to primarily target exports of natural resources and low- and medium-technology manufacturers based in Latin America and the Caribbean.

Suggested Citation

  • Durán Lima, José Elías & Aguiar, Angel & Ronzheimer, Ira, 2020. "Economic and social effects of a possible trade agreement between Latin America and Asia Pacific," Conference papers 333244, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:pugtwp:333244
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/333244/files/10550.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ganeshan Wignaraja & Peter Morgan & Michael Plummer & Fan Zhai, 2014. "Economic Implications of Deeper South Asian–Southeast Asian Integration : A CGE Approach," Trade Working Papers 24421, East Asian Bureau of Economic Research.
    2. Ando, Mitsuyo & Urata, Shujiro, 2007. "The Impacts of East Asia FTA: A CGE Model Simulation Study," East Asian Economic Review, Korea Institute for International Economic Policy, vol. 11(2), pages 3-73, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Durán Lima, José Elías & Aguiar, Angel & Ronzheimer, Ira Nadine, 2021. "Economic and social effects of a possible trade agreement between Latin America and the Asia-Pacific region," Comercio Internacional 47659, Naciones Unidas Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL).
    2. ANDO Mitsuyo, 2009. "Impacts of FTAs in East Asia: CGE Simulation Analysis," Discussion papers 09037, Research Institute of Economy, Trade and Industry (RIETI).
    3. Chae‐Deug Yi, 2023. "The economic and trade effects of the UK–Korea free trade agreement on the United Kingdom, Korea, Japan, China, and the European Union," Bulletin of Economic Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 75(2), pages 227-253, April.
    4. Bhattacharyay, Biswa Nath & Mukhopadhyay, Kakali, 2015. "A comprehensive economic partnership between India and Japan: Impact, prospects and challenges," Journal of Asian Economics, Elsevier, vol. 39(C), pages 94-107.
    5. Chae‐Deug Yi, 2022. "Economic impacts of UK's free trade agreements with Korea, Japan, and EU as a breakthrough of Brexit," Manchester School, University of Manchester, vol. 90(5), pages 541-564, September.
    6. Yi, Chae-Deug, 2020. "The computable general equilibrium analysis of the reduction in tariffs and non-tariff measures within the Korea-Japan-European Union free trade agreement," Japan and the World Economy, Elsevier, vol. 56(C).
    7. Tsung-Chen Lee (Correspondnce author) & Shiao-Wei Lo & Wen-Cheng Lin, 2017. "A Comparison Study on ASEAN-Japan and ASEAN-Korea Free Trade Agreements using CGE Model," Review of Economics & Finance, Better Advances Press, Canada, vol. 8, pages 79-95, May.
    8. Lim, Byeong-ho, 2022. "Re-Evaluation of Free Trade Agreement: Based on Regional Value Contents in Agricultural, Fishery and Livestock products," Conference papers 333476, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    9. Chae-Deug Yi, 2022. "The impact of the Japan-European Union Economic Partnership Agreement on the trade and income of Japan, the European Union, and South Korea," Asia Europe Journal, Springer, vol. 20(3), pages 329-356, September.
    10. Yoshifumi Fukunaga & Ikumo Isono, 2013. "Taking ASEAN+1 FTAs towards the RCEP: A Mapping Study," Working Papers DP-2013-02, Economic Research Institute for ASEAN and East Asia (ERIA).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    International Relations/Trade;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:pugtwp:333244. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/gtpurus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.