Persistent Pockets Of Extreme American Poverty: People Or Place Based?
Over the past four decades almost 400 U.S. counties have persistently had poverty rates in excess of 20 percent. These counties are generally characterized by weak economies and disadvantaged populations. This raises the hotly debated question of whether poverty-reducing policies should be directed more at helping people or helping the places where they reside. Using a variety of regression approaches, including geographically weighted regression analysis, we consistently find that local job growth especially reduces poverty in persistent-poverty counties. We also find that persistent-poverty counties do not respond more sluggishly to exogenous shocks, nor do they experience more adverse spillover effects from their neighboring counties. Finally, we identify some key geographic differences in the poverty determining mechanism among persistent-poverty clusters. Taken together, these results indicate that place-based economic development has a potential role for reducing poverty in these counties.
|Date of creation:||2005|
|Date of revision:|
|Contact details of provider:|| Postal: 200 Mumford Hall, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri 65211|
Web page: http://www.rprconline.org/index.htm
More information through EDIRC
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:osruwp:18907. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (AgEcon Search)
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.