IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/ncrthr/18986.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The Feasibility Of A Boxed Beef Futures Contract: Hedging Wholesale Beef Cuts

Author

Listed:
  • Mattos, Fabio
  • Garcia, Philip
  • Leuthold, Raymond M.
  • Hahn, Tony

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to investigate the feasibility of a new futures contract for hedging wholesale transactions in the beef industry based on the USDA boxed beef cutout index (BBCO). The results suggest the live cattle futures contract is not an adequate tool to manage the price risk of wholesale meat transactions in the beef industry. However, a futures contract based on the BBCO index might provide considerably more opportunities for the hedging of wholesale meat cut prices. A pattern of improved hedging effectiveness at more distant horizons also appears to emerge for the individual cuts of meat using the conditional hedge procedures. These results may be of particular interest to members of the meat industry with longer planning horizons, and more diversified transactions.

Suggested Citation

  • Mattos, Fabio & Garcia, Philip & Leuthold, Raymond M. & Hahn, Tony, 2003. "The Feasibility Of A Boxed Beef Futures Contract: Hedging Wholesale Beef Cuts," 2003 Conference, April 21-22, 2003, St. Louis, Missouri 18986, NCR-134 Conference on Applied Commodity Price Analysis, Forecasting, and Market Risk Management.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:ncrthr:18986
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.18986
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/18986/files/cp03ma03.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.18986?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Steiner, Bodo E., 2007. "Formal beef alliances and alignment challenges: issues in contracting, pricing and quality," Project Report Series 7709, University of Alberta, Department of Resource Economics and Environmental Sociology.
    2. Ardian Harri & John Michael Riley & John D. Anderson & Keith H. Coble, 2009. "Managing economic risk in value‐based marketing of fed cattle," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 40(3), pages 295-306, May.
    3. Franken, Jason R.V. & Irwin, Scott H. & Garcia, Philip, 2021. "Biodiesel hedging under binding renewable fuel standard mandates," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 96(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Marketing;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:ncrthr:18986. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/dauiuus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.