IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/miffpb/275669.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

A Review of the Draft Federal Government of Nigeria’s National Agriculture Investment Plan (NAIP2)

Author

Listed:
  • Hendriks, Sheryl L

Abstract

KEY FINDINGS It is essential that NAIPs: • Establish the pathways to change and link these to impact indicators; • Align and consider international, African and regional instruments and declarations as well as domestic priorities; • Establish appropriate technical and political structures that avoid duplication and complexity; and • Ensure that clear coordination, supervision, monitoring, evaluation and reporting structures and frameworks are set out in a coherent and integrated manner. Key messages regarding the zero draft of the Nigeria NAIP2: • There is a disconnect between the APP, Agriculture Food and Nutrition Security Strategy and the NAIP2. • The zero draft NAIP2 is intended to be the implementation plan for the APP. The Agriculture Food and Nutrition Security Strategy is intended to be the food security pillar of the APP but is not included in the design of the NAIP2. • The conceptual framework, governance and implementation modalities and monitoring and evaluation sections would benefit from significant revision to align these with internal purposes and to the Malabo commitments and indicators. • Benchmarks, pathways to change and appropriate indicators for monitoring and achieving progress on the Malabo commitments are missing. • The elements on food security, nutrition, and gender are inadequate to achieve the CAADP Malabo commitments and contribute to the achievement of the ERGP and the APP.

Suggested Citation

  • Hendriks, Sheryl L, 2018. "A Review of the Draft Federal Government of Nigeria’s National Agriculture Investment Plan (NAIP2)," Feed the Future Innovation Lab for Food Security Policy Research Briefs 275669, Michigan State University, Department of Agricultural, Food, and Resource Economics, Feed the Future Innovation Lab for Food Security (FSP).
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:miffpb:275669
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.275669
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/275669/files/Policy_Brief_59.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.275669?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Government of India Ministry of Women and Child Development, 2011. "National Nutrition Policy," Working Papers id:4396, eSocialSciences.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gillespie, Stuart & van den Bold, Mara, 2015. "Stories of change in nutrition: A tool pool:," IFPRI discussion papers 1494, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    2. Duncan, Nicolette & de Silva, Sanjiv & Conallin, John & Freed, Sarah & Akester, Michael & Baumgartner, Lee & McCartney, Matthew & Dubois, Mark & Senaratna Sellamuttu, Sonali, 2021. "Fish for whom?: Integrating the management of social complexities into technical investments for inclusive, multi-functional irrigation," World Development Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 22(C).
    3. James Wangu & Ellen Mangnus & A. C. M. (Guus) van Westen & Alphons de Vocht, 2021. "Inclusive Business for Smallholders’ Household Food and Nutrition Security: Disconcerting Results from an Analysis of a French Bean Agri-investment in Kenya," Journal of Development Policy and Practice, , vol. 6(1), pages 108-127, January.
    4. Cloete, Philip C. & Idsardi, Ernst, 2012. "Bio-fuels and Food Security in South Africa: The Role of Indigenous and Traditional Food Crops," 2012 Conference, August 18-24, 2012, Foz do Iguacu, Brazil 130172, International Association of Agricultural Economists.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Agricultural and Food Policy; Agricultural Finance; Food Security and Poverty; International Development;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:miffpb:275669. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/damsuus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.