IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/iwmirp/284265.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Market adoption and diffusion of fecal sludge-based fertilizer in developing countries: crosscountry analyses

Author

Listed:
  • Otoo, Miriam
  • Gebrezgabher, Solomie
  • Danso, G.
  • Amewu, Sena
  • Amirova, Iroda

Abstract

The safe recovery of nutrients from our waste streams allows us to address the challenges of waste management and soil nutrient depletion conjointly. Commercialization of waste-based organic fertilizers such as FortiferTM (fecal sludge-based co-compost) has the potential to generate significant benefits for developing economies via cost recovery for the sanitation sector and the provision of an alternative agricultural input for smallholder farmers. To guide future FortiferTM businesses, this report presents examples of detailed market assessments, based on farmers’ perceptions, attitudes and willingness-to-pay (WTP) for a pelletized and non-pelletized FortiferTM co-compost. The research was conducted in the Greater Accra and Western regions in Ghana, and in and around Kampala (Uganda), Bangalore (India), Hanoi (Vietnam), and Kurunegala (Sri Lanka). Cross-country analyses helped to understand the effects of market drivers and, where possible, capture lessons learned for knowledge sharing.

Suggested Citation

  • Otoo, Miriam & Gebrezgabher, Solomie & Danso, G. & Amewu, Sena & Amirova, Iroda, 2018. "Market adoption and diffusion of fecal sludge-based fertilizer in developing countries: crosscountry analyses," IWMI Reports 284265, International Water Management Institute.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:iwmirp:284265
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.284265
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/284265/files/H049028.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.284265?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Agribusiness; Agricultural Finance; Crop Production/Industries; Farm Management; Financial Economics; Food Consumption/Nutrition/Food Safety; Marketing;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:iwmirp:284265. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/iwmiclk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.