IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/fcnddp/42619.html

Systematic Client Consultation in Development: The Case of Food Policy Research in Ghana, India, Kenya, and Mali

Author

Listed:
  • Babu, Suresh Chandra
  • Brown, Lynn R.
  • McClafferty, Bonnie

Abstract

Successful food policy implementation is preceded by a defined policymaking process drawing from a sound information base. Yet too often the knowledge generated through food policy research does not become part of the local body of information and consequently is not used by policymakers. This leads to less than optimal food policies. This paper highlights the need for better linkages to be developed between the food research and food policymaking processes. We propose that a key component of the linkage is the integration of clients into the research process. This paper discusses the link between food policy researchers and one group of clients—food policy decision-makers. The paper first reviews the role of research and clients in the policymaking process and proposes a conceptual framework that integrates clients into the research process. Case studies utilizing client consultation in Ghana, India, Kenya, and Mali illustrate the hypothesis that integration of all client groups, including policy decision-makers and in-country researchers, beginning at the priority-setting stage of the research process, may best influence ultimate policy decisions.

Suggested Citation

  • Babu, Suresh Chandra & Brown, Lynn R. & McClafferty, Bonnie, 1997. "Systematic Client Consultation in Development: The Case of Food Policy Research in Ghana, India, Kenya, and Mali," FCND Discussion Papers 42619, CGIAR, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:fcnddp:42619
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.42619
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/42619/files/dp38.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.42619?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:fcnddp:42619. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ifprius.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.