IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this paper

Soil management for vegetable growing in the Philippine uplands: A bio-economic analysis

Listed author(s):
  • Akhter, Sanzida
  • Menz, Kenneth M.
Registered author(s):

    Abstract Soil nutrient loss due to soil erosion and removal in harvest with traditional farming methods where farmers do not use any fertilisers threatens the sustainability of vegetable productions in the Philippine uplands. Consequently, poor farmers are losing incomes due to declining yields. The situation is reaching crisis point. A bio-economic analysis is used in this research to investigate the economic returns in terms of gross and net annual income over time for upland farmers from adopting alternative soil management options. Cost benefit analysis is used to compare the net returns to farmers from potential management options. A bio-physical model, SCUAF, is used to simulate the long-run tomato yields and associated soil erosion, over a seven-year period, for different soil management options which are both income enhancing and soil nutrient preserving. Data obtained through experiments and surveys of upland farmers in Claveria in the Philippines island of Mindanao, are used to derive yearly production budget for tomato farming on one hectare of land. The analyses reveal that significantly higher economic returns are achievable a combination of organic and inorganic fertiliser additions. This combination seems to be most attractive since it leads to benefits in both yield increase and reduced soil erosion over time. Therefore, concentrating further research on the use of fertiliser combinations, especially at lower rates where marginal returns are highest seems to be an appropriate focus, and one which is most likely to be adopted by farmers.

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    Paper provided by Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society in its series 2010 Conference (54th), February 10-12, 2010, Adelaide, Australia with number 58874.

    in new window

    Date of creation: 2010
    Handle: RePEc:ags:aare10:58874
    Contact details of provider: Postal:
    AARES Central Office Manager, Crawford School of Public Policy, ANU, Canberra ACT 0200

    Phone: 0409 032 338
    Web page:

    More information through EDIRC

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:aare10:58874. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (AgEcon Search)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.