IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/aaea26/404664.html

To Burn or Not to Burn: Altruistic Preferences and Crop Residue Burning

Author

Listed:
  • Win, Myat Thida
  • Sarkar, Sampriti
  • Maredia, Mywish

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Win, Myat Thida & Sarkar, Sampriti & Maredia, Mywish, 2026. "To Burn or Not to Burn: Altruistic Preferences and Crop Residue Burning," 2026 Annual Meeting, July 26 - 28, 2026, Kansas City, Missouri 404664, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:aaea26:404664
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.404664
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/404664/files/177626_201017_115232_AAEA2026_Burn_or_not_to_burn_poster.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.404664?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. J. A. Bouma & M. J. Koetse, 2019. "Mind the Gap: Stated versus Revealed Donations and the Differential Role of Behavioral Factors," Land Economics, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 95(2), pages 225-245.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Frings, Oliver & Abildtrup, Jens & Montagné-Huck, Claire & Gorel, Salomé & Stenger, Anne, 2023. "Do individual PES buyers care about additionality and free-riding? A choice experiment," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 213(C).
    2. Milad Haghani & Michiel C. J. Bliemer & John M. Rose & Harmen Oppewal & Emily Lancsar, 2021. "Hypothetical bias in stated choice experiments: Part I. Integrative synthesis of empirical evidence and conceptualisation of external validity," Papers 2102.02940, arXiv.org.
    3. Endre Kildal Iversen & Kristine Grimsrud & Yohei Mitani & Henrik Lindhjem, 2022. "Altruist Talk May (also) Be Cheap: Revealed Versus Stated Altruism as a Predictor in Stated Preference Studies," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 83(3), pages 681-708, November.
    4. Sampriti Sarkar & Frank Lupi, 2026. "The Two-Edged Sword of Altruism in Willingness to Pay for Water Infrastructure and Affordability Programs," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 89(2), pages 1-31, February.
    5. Nilgen, Marco & Rode, Julian & Vorlaufer, Tobias & Vollan, Björn, 2024. "Measuring non-use values to proxy conservation preferences and policy impacts," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    6. Iwona Lupa-Wojcik, 2024. "Students' Willingness to Pay for Access to ChatGPT," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(3), pages 730-745.
    7. Bockarjova, Marija & Botzen, Wouter J.W. & Koetse, Mark J., 2020. "Economic valuation of green and blue nature in cities: A meta-analysis," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).
    8. Haghani, Milad & Bliemer, Michiel C.J. & Rose, John M. & Oppewal, Harmen & Lancsar, Emily, 2021. "Hypothetical bias in stated choice experiments: Part I. Macro-scale analysis of literature and integrative synthesis of empirical evidence from applied economics, experimental psychology and neuroimaging," Journal of choice modelling, Elsevier, vol. 41(C).
    9. Ho, Thong Q. & Nguyen, Linh T-P. & Grote, Ulrike & Rahut, Dil B. & Sonobe, Tetsushi & Nguyen, Thanh T., 2024. "Gender and generosity: How contribution information triggers solidarity behavior during a crisis," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 112(C).
    10. Hagedoorn, Liselotte C. & Koetse, Mark J. & van Beukering, Pieter J.H. & Brander, Luke M., 2021. "Reducing the finance gap for nature-based solutions with time contributions," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 52(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:aaea26:404664. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aaeaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.