IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/aaae19/295777.html

Can economic and environmental benefits associated with agricultural intensification be sustained at high population densities? a farm level empirical analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Willy, Daniel Kyalo
  • Muyanga, Milu
  • Jayne, Thomas

Abstract

The Boserupian theory holds that population density growth can be accompanied by sustainable agricultural intensification (Boserup, 1965). However, it is not certain whether the positive link between population density and environmental/economic benefits associated with agricultural intensification are indefinite. The current study utilizes cross sectional data from a random sample of farm households drawn from two densely populated Counties in Kenya to assess whether Boserupian agricultural intensification is sustainable at high population densities. The study utilizes a robust approach that incorporates soil quality parameters into economic analysis to assess the effect of population density on soil quality and crop productivity. It employs non- parametric regression, OLS regression and asymmetric trans-log production function estimation methods. Results indicate that at low a population density, endogenous sustainable agricultural intensification occurs, which is associated with improvements in soil quality and crop yields. However, as population densities exceed 600 persons/Km2, soil quality attributes such as soil texture, soil pH levels and fertility indicators such as soil organic matter (SOM) and electrical conductivity (EC) start to deteriorate. The end result of deteriorating soil quality is binding of critical nutrients and thus reduction in the crop yield response to fertilizer application. This reduces crop productivity and consequently returns to agriculture. These findings have imperative policy bearing on livelihoods and smallholder agriculture considering that a large proportion of sub-Saharan Africa’s population is dependent on rain-fed agriculture and population densities continue grow.
(This abstract was borrowed from another version of this item.)

Suggested Citation

  • Willy, Daniel Kyalo & Muyanga, Milu & Jayne, Thomas, 2019. "Can economic and environmental benefits associated with agricultural intensification be sustained at high population densities? a farm level empirical analysis," 2019 Sixth International Conference, September 23-26, 2019, Abuja, Nigeria 295777, African Association of Agricultural Economists (AAAE).
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:aaae19:295777
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.295777
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/295777/files/224.%20Intensification%20in%20Kenya.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.295777?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ligang Lyu & Zhoubing Gao & Hualou Long & Xiaorui Wang & Yeting Fan, 2021. "Farmland Use Transition in a Typical Farming Area: The Case of Sihong County in the Huang-Huai-Hai Plain of China," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-16, March.
    2. Liang, Xinyuan & Jin, Xiaobin & Sun, Rui & Han, Bo & Liu, Jing & Zhou, Yinkang, 2021. "A typical phenomenon of cultivated land use in China's economically developed areas: Anti-intensification in Jiangsu Province," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    3. Peng Cheng & Houtian Tang & Yue Dong & Ke Liu & Ping Jiang & Yaolin Liu, 2021. "Knowledge Mapping of Research on Land Use Change and Food Security: A Visual Analysis Using CiteSpace and VOSviewer," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(24), pages 1-22, December.
    4. Meinzen-Dick, Laura & Zavale, Helder, 2025. "Gender and tenure insecurity in a matrilineal customary system," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    5. Ke, Xinli & Chen, Jing & Zuo, Chengchao & Wang, Xiaoqian, 2024. "The cropland intensive utilisation transition in China: An induced factor substitution perspective," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 141(C).
    6. Xiangyu Zhao & Wenzhi Yan & Kaige Wang & Yan Xu & Huihui Zheng & Zhiting Sang, 2023. "Study of the Morphological Characteristics of Cultivated Land in Semiarid Sandy Areas," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-13, September.
    7. Hualin Xie & Yingqian Huang & Qianru Chen & Yanwei Zhang & Qing Wu, 2019. "Prospects for Agricultural Sustainable Intensification: A Review of Research," Land, MDPI, vol. 8(11), pages 1-27, October.
    8. Peng, Benhong & Chen, Hong & Elahi, Ehsan & Wei, Guo, 2020. "Study on the spatial differentiation of environmental governance performance of Yangtze river urban agglomeration in Jiangsu province of China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    9. Mulwa, Chalmers K. & Visser, Martine, 2020. "Farm diversification as an adaptation strategy to climatic shocks and implications for food security in northern Namibia," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 129(C).
    10. Zheng Zang & Qilong Ren & Yuqing Zhang, 2022. "Analysis of the Spatial Adaptability of Gross Ecosystem Production, Gross Domestic Production, and Population Density in Chinese Mainland," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-14, August.
    11. Ankit & Dhram Prakash & Sunita Sheoran & Parmod Kumar Yadav & Dev Raj & Rachna & Rajeev Kumar Gupta & Salah El-Hendawy & Mohamed A. Mattar, 2024. "Sustainable Cropping Sequences to Improve Soil Fertility and Microbiological Properties," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(22), pages 1-28, November.
    12. Makaiko G. Khonje & Christone Nyondo & Lemekezani Chilora & Julius H. Mangisoni & Jacob Ricker‐Gilbert & William J. Burke, 2022. "Exploring adoption effects of subsidies and soil fertility management in Malawi," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 73(3), pages 874-892, September.
    13. Kamau, Philip & Willy, Daniel & Ngare, Lucy, 2020. "Resource use efficiency among rice farmers around fragile ecosystems: evidence from Kilombero wetland, Tanzania," APSTRACT: Applied Studies in Agribusiness and Commerce, AGRIMBA, vol. 14(3-4), December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:aaae19:295777. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aaaeaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.