IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/aaacwp/294164.html

Canadian Consumer Acceptance of Gene-Edited Versus Genetically Modified Potatoes: A Choice Experiment Approach

Author

Listed:
  • Muringai, Violet
  • Fan, Xiaoli
  • Goddard, Ellen

Abstract

In 2016, the second-generation genetically modified (GM) potatoes were approved for production and sale in Canada. In this study, we analyze how consumer acceptance of GM potatoes are affected by various factors including the trait introduced (i.e., the product benefits) by using genetic technologies, the type of breeding technology used, and the developer of the potato with any technology. We conduct an online survey and use a stated choice experiment to collect data on consumer acceptance of GM and gene-edited potatoes in Canada. Random utility models are used to analyze the economic value consumers place on the attributes of the GM and gene-edited potatoes. Our results show that consumers are willing to pay more for a health attribute (reduced acrylamide produced when potatoes are fried) as compared to environmental benefits. Respondents in general need to face discounted prices to buy potatoes created by either gene editing or GM (both transgenic and cisgenic/intragenic) technologies. However, consumers are more accepting of the gene editing technology than GM technologies. Our results also show that government is the most preferred developer of the potatoes. Results from this study can help policymakers design better information policies to improve consumer acceptance of gene-edited and GM potatoes.

Suggested Citation

  • Muringai, Violet & Fan, Xiaoli & Goddard, Ellen, 2019. "Canadian Consumer Acceptance of Gene-Edited Versus Genetically Modified Potatoes: A Choice Experiment Approach," Working Papers 294164, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:aaacwp:294164
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.294164
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/294164/files/Canadian%20Consumer%20Acceptance%20of%20Gene-Edited%20versus%20Genetically%20Modified%20Potatoes.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.294164?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:aaacwp:294164. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/agrgvca.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.