IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/aep/anales/4647.html

Análisis de la Topología de las relaciones entre Bancos y Firmas mediante Redes Complejas: comparación del caso de Argentina e Italia

Author

Listed:
  • Diaz de la Fuente Manuel

Abstract

En este trabajo se explora la estructura de interdependencias entre bancos y firmas, que se conectan a través del crédito en Argentina. Por otro lado, se comparan los resultados con un trabajo en donde se estudian estas mismas relaciones en Italia. Los datos provienen de la Central de Deudores del BCRA y para analizar la topología de las relaciones se utiliza la metodología de redes complejas. A partir de este estudio, se encuentran diferencias estructurales entre ambos países, particularmente se diferencian en las distribuciones de grado y en las tendencias de sus agentes por conectarse con otros similares. Estas diferencias pueden ser el resultado de los distintos comportamientos y las distintas formas de relacionarse en ambos países estos tipos de agentes. En especial se resalta una mayor concentración y un comportamiento más homogéneo por parte de los bancos argentinos por sobre los bancos italianos.

Suggested Citation

  • Diaz de la Fuente Manuel, 2023. "Análisis de la Topología de las relaciones entre Bancos y Firmas mediante Redes Complejas: comparación del caso de Argentina e Italia," Asociación Argentina de Economía Política: Working Papers 4647, Asociación Argentina de Economía Política.
    • Handle: RePEc:aep:anales:4647
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://aaep.org.ar/works/works2023/4647.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Edson Bastos Santos & Rama Cont, 2010. "The Brazilian Interbank Network Structure and Systemic Risk," Working Papers Series 219, Central Bank of Brazil, Research Department.
    2. Ongena, Steven & Smith, David C., 2000. "What Determines the Number of Bank Relationships? Cross-Country Evidence," Journal of Financial Intermediation, Elsevier, vol. 9(1), pages 26-56, January.
    3. Luca Marotta & Salvatore Miccichè & Yoshi Fujiwara & Hiroshi Iyetomi & Hideaki Aoyama & Mauro Gallegati & Rosario N Mantegna, 2015. "Bank-Firm Credit Network in Japan: An Analysis of a Bipartite Network," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(5), pages 1-18, May.
    4. G. De Masi & M. Gallegati, 2012. "Bank–firms topology in Italy," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 43(2), pages 851-866, October.
    5. Foglia, A. & Laviola, S. & Marullo Reedtz, P., 1998. "Multiple banking relationships and the fragility of corporate borrowers," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 22(10-11), pages 1441-1456, October.
    6. Andrew G. Haldane & Robert M. May, 2011. "Systemic risk in banking ecosystems," Nature, Nature, vol. 469(7330), pages 351-355, January.
    7. Battiston, Stefano & Delli Gatti, Domenico & Gallegati, Mauro & Greenwald, Bruce & Stiglitz, Joseph E., 2012. "Liaisons dangereuses: Increasing connectivity, risk sharing, and systemic risk," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 36(8), pages 1121-1141.
    8. Elosegui, Pedro & Forte, Federico D. & Montes-Rojas, Gabriel, 2022. "Network structure and fragmentation of the Argentinean interbank markets," Latin American Journal of Central Banking (previously Monetaria), Elsevier, vol. 3(3).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Duc Thi Luu, 2022. "Portfolio Correlations in the Bank-Firm Credit Market of Japan," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 60(2), pages 529-569, August.
    2. Diego Aparicio & Daniel Fraiman, 2015. "Banking Networks And Leverage Dependence In Emerging Countries," Advances in Complex Systems (ACS), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 18(07n08), pages 1-21, November.
    3. Solange Maria Guerra & Benjamin Miranda Tabak & Rodrigo Cesar de Castro Miranda, 2014. "Do Interconnections Matter for Bank Efficiency?," Working Papers Series 374, Central Bank of Brazil, Research Department.
    4. Ginés Hernández-Cánovas & Pedro Martínez-Solano, 2007. "Effect of the Number of Banking Relationships on Credit Availability: Evidence from Panel Data of Spanish Small Firms," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 28(1), pages 37-53, January.
    5. Dongwoo Kim & Hoon Jung, 2025. "Impact of economic crises on corporate‐banking relationship: Evidence from Korea," Economics of Transition and Institutional Change, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 33(1), pages 195-205, January.
    6. repec:dau:papers:123456789/3322 is not listed on IDEAS
    7. Javier Sánchez García & Salvador Cruz Rambaud, 2024. "The network econometrics of financial concentration," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 18(7), pages 2007-2045, July.
    8. Wang, Weijia, 2019. "A Pareto Criterion on Systemic Risk," MPRA Paper 93699, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    9. Dirk Helbing, 2013. "Economics 2.0: The Natural Step towards A Self-Regulating, Participatory Market Society," Papers 1305.4078, arXiv.org, revised Jun 2013.
    10. Li, Fei & Kang, Hao & Xu, Jingfeng, 2022. "Financial stability and network complexity: A random matrix approach," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 177-185.
    11. Annamaria Nifo & Sabrina Ruberto & Gaetano Vecchione, 2018. "Does institutional quality matter for lending relationships?," Journal of Applied Finance & Banking, SCIENPRESS Ltd, vol. 8(2), pages 1-4.
    12. Olivier de Bandt & Jean-Cyprien Héam & Claire Labonne & Santiago Tavolaro, 2015. "La mesure du risque systémique après la crise financière," Revue économique, Presses de Sciences-Po, vol. 66(3), pages 481-500.
    13. Andrea Fracasso & Valentina Peruzzi & Chiara Tomasi, 2024. "Multiple banking relationships: the role of firm connectedness," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 33(5), pages 1231-1252.
    14. Carlos Ramírez, 2019. "Regulating Financial Networks Under Uncertainty," Finance and Economics Discussion Series 2019-056, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (U.S.).
    15. Giuseppina Damiana Costanzo & Marianna Succurro & Francesco Trivieri, 2023. "Banking diversity and firms’ exit: A study on Italian data," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 33(5), pages 1537-1570, November.
    16. Matteo Smerlak & Brady Stoll & Agam Gupta & James S Magdanz, 2015. "Mapping Systemic Risk: Critical Degree and Failures Distribution in Financial Networks," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(7), pages 1-15, July.
    17. Didier Wernli & Lucas Böttcher & Flore Vanackere & Yuliya Kaspiarovich & Maria Masood & Nicolas Levrat, 2023. "Understanding and governing global systemic crises in the 21st century: A complexity perspective," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 14(2), pages 207-228, May.
    18. Farinha, Luisa A. & Santos, Joao A. C., 2002. "Switching from Single to Multiple Bank Lending Relationships: Determinants and Implications," Journal of Financial Intermediation, Elsevier, vol. 11(2), pages 124-151, April.
    19. Diego Aparicio & Daniel Fraiman, 2015. "Banking Networks and Leverage Dependence: Evidence from Selected Emerging Countries," Papers 1507.01901, arXiv.org.
    20. Irena Vodenska & Alexander P. Becker & Di Zhou & Dror Y. Kenett & H. Eugene Stanley & Shlomo Havlin, 2016. "Community Analysis of Global Financial Markets," Risks, MDPI, vol. 4(2), pages 1-15, May.
    21. X. Zhang & L. D. Valdez & H. E. Stanley & L. A. Braunstein, 2019. "Modeling Risk Contagion in the Venture Capital Market: A Multilayer Network Approach," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2019, pages 1-11, December.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • G1 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets
    • C0 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aep:anales:4647. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Juan Manuel Quintero (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aaeppea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.