IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/sprchp/978-0-387-29175-8_8.html

Technology and the Labor Market

In: Jacob Mincer A Pioneer of Modern Labor Economics

Author

Listed:
  • Jacob Mincer

Abstract

Economic developments of the past 3 decades posed new questions to economists: What are the causes of fluctuations in rates of return to human capital? What is the relation between the changing skill-wage structure and changing overall wage inequality? Does the widening of the wage structure produce an equilibrating supply response? What are the causes, dimensions and implications of the “technological cycle” for wages, unemployment, and its “natural rate”? Why is the long term trend of human capital formation relentlessly upward? My research of the past decade, among that of other economists, attempted to provide answers to these questions, as described above. In the course of the analysis several misconceptions are clarified: (1) The view of an increasing “wage gap” as a worsening “social divide” misses the incentive effects of the increased rates of return on furthering investments in human capital. These are empirically documented. (2) Growing overall wage inequality can conceal a declining inequality of opportunity as it did in recent decades. (3) Technological unemployment as an aggregate phenomenon appears to be a myth. (4) The concurrent supply response to increasing demand for human capital applies to investments, not to the stock. The accumulation of investments (such as enrollments) over time produces a lag in the response of the human capital stock. This lag is a basic cause of the “technological cycle”. Finally, it is worth noting that a positive skill bias is not inherent in technological changes. These may sometimes carry a negative effect on the demand for human capital. The implications of “deskilling” (the assembly line is an example) would be the opposite of what we found for the recent decades (1970–2000). However the long-term growth of human capital suggests a positive skill bias in the long run.

Suggested Citation

  • Jacob Mincer, 2006. "Technology and the Labor Market," Springer Books, in: Shoshana Grossbard (ed.), Jacob Mincer A Pioneer of Modern Labor Economics, chapter 8, pages 53-77, Springer.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-0-387-29175-8_8
    DOI: 10.1007/0-387-29175-X_8
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a
    for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Other versions of this item:

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Gavrel, Frédéric & Lebon, Isabelle & Rebière, Thérèse, 2016. "Formal education versus learning-by-doing: On the labor market efficiency of educational choices," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 545-562.
    3. Thérèse REBIÈRE & Frédéric GAVREL & Isabelle LEBON, 2009. "Formal Education Versus Learning-by-doing," EcoMod2009 21500078, EcoMod.
    4. Thomas RUTHERFORD, 2009. "Stochastic Programming in a Complementarity Format: Tools and Sample Applications," EcoMod2009 21500079, EcoMod.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-0-387-29175-8_8. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.