IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/sprchp/978-0-387-25534-7_21.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

Efficiency Dominance Analysis (EDA): Basic Methodology

In: Public goods, environmental externalities and fiscal competition

Author

Listed:
  • Henry Tulkens

Abstract

This paper argues that for evaluating efficiency in the economic sense of an organization (any DMU, in the Charnes, Cooper and Rhodes (1978) terminology), the notion of frontier is less basic than the one of dominance. In Section 2, three different ways to define this concept are proposed: pairwise E-dominance, setwise E-dominance and global E-dominance. In Section 3, numerical measurement methods are proposed for each. Properties of EDA are highlighted and contrasted with the frontier methodology in the concluding Section 4.

Suggested Citation

  • Henry Tulkens, 2006. "Efficiency Dominance Analysis (EDA): Basic Methodology," Springer Books, in: Parkash Chander & Jacques Drèze & C. Knox Lovell & Jack Mintz (ed.), Public goods, environmental externalities and fiscal competition, chapter 0, pages 431-442, Springer.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-0-387-25534-7_21
    DOI: 10.1007/978-0-387-25534-7_21
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Gavoille, Nicolas & Verschelde, Marijn, 2017. "Electoral competition and political selection: An analysis of the activity of French deputies, 1958–2012," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 180-195.
    2. Millington, H.K. & Lovell, J.E. & Lovell, C.A.K., 2015. "A framework for guiding the management of urban stream health," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 222-233.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-0-387-25534-7_21. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.