IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/isochp/978-3-319-48461-7_7.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

On the Use of DEA Models with Weight Restrictions for Benchmarking and Target Setting

In: Advances in Efficiency and Productivity

Author

Listed:
  • Nuria Ramón

    (Universidad Miguel Hernández. Avd. de la Universidad)

  • José L. Ruiz

    (Universidad Miguel Hernández. Avd. de la Universidad)

  • Inmaculada Sirvent

    (Universidad Miguel Hernández. Avd. de la Universidad)

Abstract

This chapter discusses the use of DEA models with weight restrictions for purposes of benchmarking and target setting. Weight restrictions have been used in the literature to incorporate into the analysis both value judgments (managerial preferences or prior views about the relative worth of inputs and outputs) and technological judgments (assumptions on production trade-offs). An important consideration in the use of restricted models for the benchmarking is that they may provide targets that are outside the production possibility set (PPS). Such difficulties are overcome if weight restrictions represent production trade-offs, because in those cases restricted models lead to a meaningful expansion of the production technology. However, if weight restrictions are only used as a way of incorporating preferences or value judgments, then there could be no reason to consider the targets derived from those models as attainable. Despite the classical restricted DEA formulations may yield targets within the PPS, it is claimed here that an approach based on a more appropriate selection of benchmarks would be desirable. We develop some restricted models which provide the closest targets within the PPS that are Pareto-efficient. Thus, if weight restrictions represent value judgments, the proposed approach allows us to identify best practices which show the easiest way for improvement and are desirable (in the light of prior knowledge and expert opinion) in addition to technically achievable.

Suggested Citation

  • Nuria Ramón & José L. Ruiz & Inmaculada Sirvent, 2016. "On the Use of DEA Models with Weight Restrictions for Benchmarking and Target Setting," International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, in: Juan Aparicio & C. A. Knox Lovell & Jesus T. Pastor (ed.), Advances in Efficiency and Productivity, chapter 0, pages 149-180, Springer.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:isochp:978-3-319-48461-7_7
    DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-48461-7_7
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ramón, Nuria & Ruiz, José L. & Sirvent, Inmaculada, 2020. "Cross-benchmarking for performance evaluation: Looking across best practices of different peer groups using DEA," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    2. Monge, Juan F. & Ruiz, José L., 2023. "Setting closer targets based on non-dominated convex combinations of Pareto-efficient units: A bi-level linear programming approach in Data Envelopment Analysis," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 311(3), pages 1084-1096.
    3. Ruiz, José L. & Sirvent, Inmaculada, 2019. "Performance evaluation through DEA benchmarking adjusted to goals," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 150-157.
    4. Somayeh Razipour-GhalehJough & Farhad Hosseinzadeh Lotfi & Gholamreza Jahanshahloo & Mohsen Rostamy-malkhalifeh & Hamid Sharafi, 2020. "Finding closest target for bank branches in the presence of weight restrictions using data envelopment analysis," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 288(2), pages 755-787, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:isochp:978-3-319-48461-7_7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.