IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/mgt/micp15/251-258.html

Performance Evaluation and Ranking of Turkish Private Banks Using AHP and TOPSIS

Author

Listed:
  • K. Batu Tunay

    (Marmara University, Turkey)

  • Ilyas Akhisar

    (Marmara University, Turkey)

Abstract

Measuring performance and determining the key factors of performance have been an important research topic in different sector in recent years. The main goal of this study is to evaluate the performance ranks of the private banks in Turkey due to the fact that performances of private banks are important at the stage of economic growth. In this research, the private banks in Turkey ranked by TOPSIS method using weights of capital ratios obtained from AHP. The performance ranks of private banks sorted according to their TOPSIS scores for the period 2009-2013. In this study, capital ratios of Turkish private banks are placed in a hierarchical decision structure to establish pairwise comparisons between the model parameters which are based on the subjective judgment of a group of experts. , In order to find the performance order of the private banks in Turkey according to capital ratios, calculated criteria and sub-criteria weights for each banks by using AHP to use in TOPSIS method. Performance scores of private the banks obtained by TOPSIS method related with banks’ capital ratios of AHP weights. Consequently, the performances and also the sector share of the private banks weren't changed for analyzed period.

Suggested Citation

  • K. Batu Tunay & Ilyas Akhisar, 2015. "Performance Evaluation and Ranking of Turkish Private Banks Using AHP and TOPSIS," MIC 2015: Managing Sustainable Growth; Proceedings of the Joint International Conference, Portorož, Slovenia, 28–30 May 2015,, University of Primorska, Faculty of Management Koper.
    • Handle: RePEc:mgt:micp15:251-258
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.fm-kp.si/zalozba/ISBN/978-961-266-181-6/94.pdf
    File Function: full text
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Suwignjo, P. & Bititci, U. S & Carrie, A. S, 2000. "Quantitative models for performance measurement system," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 64(1-3), pages 231-241, March.
    2. R. Alton Gilbert & Courtenay C. Stone & Michael E. Trebing, 1985. "The new bank capital adequacy standards," Review, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis, vol. 67(May), pages 12-20.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Işıl EREM, 2017. "The Relationship Between Corporate Governance Compliance Ratings And Financial Performance: An Investigation On Banks Listed In Borsa Istanbul Corporate Governance Index," EcoForum, "Stefan cel Mare" University of Suceava, Romania, Faculty of Economics and Public Administration - Economy, Business Administration and Tourism Department., vol. 6(1), pages 1-42, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ilkka Sillanpää, 2012. "Empirical Study of Measuring Supply Chain Performance," MIC 2012: Managing Transformation with Creativity; Proceedings of the 13th International Conference, Budapest, 22–24 November 2012 [Selected Papers],, University of Primorska, Faculty of Management Koper.
    2. Giachetti, Ronald E. & Martinez, Luis D. & Saenz, Oscar A. & Chen, Chin-Sheng, 2003. "Analysis of the structural measures of flexibility and agility using a measurement theoretical framework," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 86(1), pages 47-62, October.
    3. Pamela P. Peterson & Larry D. Wall, 1996. "Banks' responses to binding regulatory capital requirements," Economic Review, Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta, vol. 80(Mar), pages 1-17.
    4. Chung, Shu-Hsing & Lee, Amy H. I. & Pearn, W. L., 2005. "Analytic network process (ANP) approach for product mix planning in semiconductor fabricator," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 96(1), pages 15-36, April.
    5. Flávio Cunha & José Dinis-Carvalho & Rui M. Sousa, 2024. "Assessment of Performance Measurement Systems’ Ability to Mitigate or Eliminate Typical Barriers Compromising Organisational Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-16, March.
    6. Hiemstra, Stephen W. & Koenig, Steven R. & Freshwater, David, 1988. "Prospects for a Secondary Market for Farm Mortgages," Agricultural Economic Reports 308066, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    7. Dmitry Nazarov, 2020. "Causality: Intelligent Valuation Models in the Digital Economy," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(12), pages 1-16, December.
    8. R. Alton Gilbert, 1991. "Do bank holding companies act as "sources of strength" for their bank subsidiaries?," Review, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis, issue Jan, pages 3-18.
    9. F A F Ferreira & S P Santos & P M M Rodrigues, 2011. "Adding value to bank branch performance evaluation using cognitive maps and MCDA: a case study," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 62(7), pages 1320-1333, July.
    10. Ilyas Akhisar & Necla Tunay, 2015. "Performance Ranking of Turkish Life Insurance Companies Using AHP and TOPSIS," MIC 2015: Managing Sustainable Growth; Proceedings of the Joint International Conference, Portorož, Slovenia, 28–30 May 2015,, University of Primorska, Faculty of Management Koper.
    11. Mikesell, James J. & Marlor, Felice S., 1991. "Nonmetro, Metro, and U.S. Bank-Operating Statistics, 1987-89," Statistical Bulletin 154732, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    12. L. Berrah & V. Clivillé & J. Montmain & G. Mauris, 2019. "The Contribution concept for the control of a manufacturing multi-criteria performance improvement," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 30(1), pages 47-58, January.
    13. Avninder Gill, 2011. "Measurement and Comparison of Productivity Performance Under Fuzzy Imprecise Data," International Journal of Business Research and Management (IJBRM), Computer Science Journals (CSC Journals), vol. 2(1), pages 19-32, April.
    14. Sarkis, Joseph, 2003. "Quantitative models for performance measurement systems--alternate considerations," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 86(1), pages 81-90, October.
    15. Lynn M. Barry, 1987. "A review of the Eighth District's banking economy in 1986," Review, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis, issue Apr, pages 16-21.
    16. Mikesell, James J., 1988. "Nonmetro, Metro, And U.S. Bank Operating Statistics, 1985," Staff Reports 278057, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    17. Bititci, U. S. & Suwignjo, P. & Carrie, A. S., 2001. "Strategy management through quantitative modelling of performance measurement systems," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 69(1), pages 15-22, January.
    18. Santos, Sérgio P. & Belton, Valerie & Howick, Susan & Pilkington, Martin, 2018. "Measuring organisational performance using a mix of OR methods," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 18-30.
    19. Mikesell, James J. & Marlor, Felice S., 1992. "Nonmetro, Metro, and U.S. Bank-Operating Statistics, 1990," Statistical Bulletin 154785, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    20. Chen, Chee-Cheng, 2008. "An objective-oriented and product-line-based manufacturing performance measurement," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 112(1), pages 380-390, March.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mgt:micp15:251-258. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Alen Jezovnik (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fmkupsi.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.