IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/ibg/chaptr/msc-17.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

Potential for Innovation and Competitiveness of Serbian Small and Medium Enterprises

In: Managing Structural Changes - Trends and Requirements

Author

Listed:
  • Boban Stojanovic

    (University of Nis, Faculty of Economics)

  • Sneyana Radukic

    (University of Nis, Faculty of Economics)

Abstract

The aim of this chapter was to analyse the potential for innovation and competitiveness of small and medium enterprises in Serbia. Presenting the strategy and the project which are determining the innovation of small and medium enterprise, it is necessary to know their significance for the further development of the Serbian economy. Following step is to elaborate the key actions of banks in the initial financing of small and medium enterprises. Finally, to point out the importance of the Strategy "Europe 2020" for improvement of innovation conditions in small and medium enterprises as well as to increase their participation in the global market.

Suggested Citation

  • Boban Stojanovic & Sneyana Radukic, 2012. "Potential for Innovation and Competitiveness of Serbian Small and Medium Enterprises," Book Chapters, in: João Sousa Andrade & Marta C. N. Simões & Ivan Stosic & Dejan Eric & Hasan Hanic (ed.), Managing Structural Changes - Trends and Requirements, edition 1, volume 1, chapter 17, pages 334-345, Institute of Economic Sciences.
    • Handle: RePEc:ibg:chaptr:msc-17
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.ien.bg.ac.rs/images/stories/download/managestr_ch17.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. R. Veugelers, 2008. "The Role of SMEs in Innovation in the EU. A Case for Policy Intervention?," Review of Business and Economic Literature, KU Leuven, Faculty of Economics and Business (FEB), Review of Business and Economic Literature, vol. 0(3), pages 239-262.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jean Acheson & Rory Malone, 2020. "Respect Your Elders: Evidence from Ireland’s R&D Tax Credit Reform," The Economic and Social Review, Economic and Social Studies, vol. 51(1), pages 105-131.
    2. H. T. Tran & E. Santarelli, 2013. "Determinants and Effects of Innovative Activities in Vietnam. A Firm-level Analysis," Working Papers wp909, Dipartimento Scienze Economiche, Universita' di Bologna.
    3. Colombelli, Alessandra & Grilli, Luca & Minola, Tommaso & Mrkajic, Boris, 2020. "To what extent do young innovative companies take advantage of policy support to enact innovation appropriation mechanisms?," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 49(10).
    4. Dirk Czarnitzki & Julie Delanote, 2015. "R&D policies for young SMEs: input and output effects," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 45(3), pages 465-485, October.
    5. Waqar Wadho & Azam Chaudhry, 2019. "Identifying and Understanding High Growth Firms in the Pakistani Textile and Apparel Sectors," Lahore Journal of Economics, Department of Economics, The Lahore School of Economics, vol. 24(2), pages 73-92, July-Dec.
    6. Daria Ciriaci & Pietro Moncada-Paternò-Castello & Peter Voigt, 2016. "Innovation and job creation: a sustainable relation?," Eurasian Business Review, Springer;Eurasia Business and Economics Society, vol. 6(2), pages 189-213, August.
    7. Robbins Peter & O’Gorman Colm, 2016. "Innovation processes: do they help or hinder new product development outcomes in Irish SMEs?," The Irish Journal of Management, Sciendo, vol. 35(1), pages 104-107, April.
    8. Niccolò Ghio & Massimiliano Guerini & Cristina Rossi-Lamastra, 2016. "University knowledge and the creation of innovative start-ups: an analysis of the Italian case," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 47(2), pages 293-311, August.
    9. David Audretsch & Agustí Segarra & Mercedes Teruel, 2014. "Why don't all young firms invest in R&D?," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 43(4), pages 751-766, December.
    10. Balsmeier, Benjamin & Delanote, Julie, 2015. "Employment growth heterogeneity under varying intellectual property rights regimes in European transition economies: Young vs. mature innovators," Journal of Comparative Economics, Elsevier, vol. 43(4), pages 1069-1084.
    11. Dirk Czarnitzki & Julie Delanote, 2013. "Young Innovative Companies: the new high-growth firms?," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 22(5), pages 1315-1340, October.
    12. Kleine, Marco & Heite, Jonas & Huber, Laura Rosendahl, 2022. "Subsidized R&D collaboration: The causal effect of innovation vouchers on innovation outcomes," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(6).
    13. Czarnitzki, Dirk & Giebel, Marek, 2021. "Financial constraints for R&D and innovation: New evidence from a survey experiment," ZEW Discussion Papers 21-084, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.
    14. Enrico Santarelli & Hien Thu Tran, 2017. "Young innovative companies: Are they high performers in transition economies? Evidence for Vietnam," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 42(5), pages 1052-1076, October.
    15. Raphaël Chiappini & Samira Demaria & Benjamin Montmartin & Sophie Pommet, 2020. "Can Direct Innovation Subsidies Relax SMEs' Credit Constraints?," GREDEG Working Papers 2020-09, Groupe de REcherche en Droit, Economie, Gestion (GREDEG CNRS), Université Côte d'Azur, France.
    16. Heike Belitz & Anna Lejpras, 2016. "Financing patterns of R&D in small and medium-sized enterprises and the perception of innovation barriers in Germany," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 43(2), pages 245-261.
    17. Heike Belitz & Anna Lejpras, 2014. "Financing Patterns of Innovative SMEs and the Perception of Innovation Barriers in Germany," Discussion Papers of DIW Berlin 1353, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.
    18. Nguyen Thi Oanh, 2019. "The Relationship between Innovation Capability, Innovation Type and Innovation Performance in FDI Enterprises in Vietnam," International Journal of Economics and Finance, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 11(8), pages 1-28, August.
    19. Tulus Suryanto & Darul Dimasqy & Reza Ronaldo & Mahjus Ekananda & Teuku Heru Dinata & Indra Tumbelaka, 2020. "The Influence of Liberalization on Innovation, Performance, and Competition Level of Insurance Industry in Indonesia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-25, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibg:chaptr:msc-17. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Zorica Bozic (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ienbgyu.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.