IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/elg/eechap/3926_6.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

Brazilian Regulatory Agencies: Early Appraisal and Looming Challenges

In: Regulating Development

Author

Listed:
  • Andrea Goldstein
  • José Claudio Linhares Pires

Abstract

Regulating Development examines the impact that regulation – good or bad – can have on the development of poorer societies. It opens with a succinct review of critical issues, including the implications of the spread of intellectual property rights legislation and the role of the World Trade Organisation (WTO).

Suggested Citation

  • Andrea Goldstein & José Claudio Linhares Pires, 2006. "Brazilian Regulatory Agencies: Early Appraisal and Looming Challenges," Chapters, in: Edmund Amann (ed.), Regulating Development, chapter 6, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    • Handle: RePEc:elg:eechap:3926_6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.elgaronline.com/view/9781845424992.00015.xml
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Enzo Pontarollo & Andrea Oglietti, 2000. "La performance dell'Autorità per le Garanzie nelle Comunicazioni: un primo esame," L'industria, Società editrice il Mulino, issue 4, pages 765-784.
    2. Majone, Giandomenico, 1997. "From the Positive to the Regulatory State: Causes and Consequences of Changes in the Mode of Governance," Journal of Public Policy, Cambridge University Press, vol. 17(2), pages 139-167, May.
    3. Berg, Sanford, 2000. "Developments in Best-Practice Regulation: Principles, Processes, and Performance," The Electricity Journal, Elsevier, vol. 13(6), pages 11-18, July.
    4. A. W. Dnes & J. S. Seaton, 1999. "The regulation of electricity: results from an event study," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 31(5), pages 609-618.
    5. Preetum Domah & Michael G. Pollitt, 2001. "The restructuring and privatisation of the electricity distribution and supply businesses in England," Fiscal Studies, Institute for Fiscal Studies, vol. 22(1), pages 107-146, March.
    6. Antonio Estache & Andrea Goldstein & Russell Pittman, 2001. "Privatization and Regulatory Reform in Brazil: The Case of Freight Railways," Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade, Springer, vol. 1(2), pages 203-235, June.
    7. Pippo Ranci, 2000. "Un contributo per valutare l'Autorità per l'energia elettrica e il gas," L'industria, Società editrice il Mulino, issue 4, pages 749-764.
    8. Alexander, Ian & Mayer, Colin & Weeds, Helen, 1996. "Regulatory structure and risk and infrastructure firms : an international comparison," Policy Research Working Paper Series 1698, The World Bank.
    9. Fgv-Eesp, 2001. "Private Participation in Infrastructure Projects and Determinants of Observed Contractual Arrangements: The Case of Brazil," Research Department Publications 3112, Inter-American Development Bank, Research Department.
    10. Goldstein, Andrea, 1999. "Brazilian Privatization in International Perspective: The Rocky Path from State Capitalism to Regulatory Capitalism," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 8(4), pages 673-711, December.
    11. Levy, Brian & Spiller, Pablo T, 1994. "The Institutional Foundations of Regulatory Commitment: A Comparative Analysis of Telecommunications Regulation," The Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, Oxford University Press, vol. 10(2), pages 201-246, October.
    12. Antonio Estache & D. Martimort, 2000. "Transaction costs, politics, regulatory institutions and regulatory outcomes," ULB Institutional Repository 2013/44072, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
    13. Noll, Roger G., 1989. "Economic perspectives on the politics of regulation," Handbook of Industrial Organization, in: R. Schmalensee & R. Willig (ed.), Handbook of Industrial Organization, edition 1, volume 2, chapter 22, pages 1253-1287, Elsevier.
    14. Herrera, Alejandra, 2001. "Contribución al debate: reflexiones sobre el sector de telecomunicaciones," Sede de la CEPAL en Santiago (Estudios e Investigaciones) 34837, Naciones Unidas Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL).
    15. Antonio Abate & Alberto Clô, 2000. "La regolazione elettrica in Italia: alcune prime valutazioni," L'industria, Società editrice il Mulino, issue 4, pages 709-748.
    16. Ha-Joon Chang, 2002. "Breaking the mould: an institutionalist political economy alternative to the neo-liberal theory of the market and the state," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 26(5), pages 539-559, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Amann, Edmund & Baer, Werner, 2008. "Neo-liberalism and market concentration in Brazil: The emergence of a contradiction?," The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 48(2), pages 252-262, May.
    2. Knight-John, Malathy & Jayasinghe, Shantha & Perumal, Andrew, 2004. "Regulatory Impact Assessment in Sri Lanka: The Bridges That Have To Be Crossed," Centre on Regulation and Competition (CRC) Working papers 30666, University of Manchester, Institute for Development Policy and Management (IDPM).
    3. Amann, Edmund & Baer, Werner, 2005. "Neo-Liberalism and Market Concentration in Brazil: The Emergence of a Contradiction?," Centre on Regulation and Competition (CRC) Working papers 30658, University of Manchester, Institute for Development Policy and Management (IDPM).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Antonio Estache & L. Wren-Lewis, 2008. "Towards a Theory of Regulation for Developing Countries: Following Laffont's Lead," Working Papers ECARES 2008_018, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
    2. Antonio Afonso & Carla Scaglioni, 2006. "An Assessment of Telecommunications Regulation Performance in the European Union," Working Papers Department of Economics 2006/07, ISEG - Lisbon School of Economics and Management, Department of Economics, Universidade de Lisboa.
    3. Knight-John, Malathy & Jayasinghe, Shantha & Perumal, Andrew, 2004. "Regulatory Impact Assessment in Sri Lanka: The Bridges That Have To Be Crossed," Centre on Regulation and Competition (CRC) Working papers 30666, University of Manchester, Institute for Development Policy and Management (IDPM).
    4. Adwoa Asantewaa & Tooraj Jamasb & Manuel Llorca, 2022. "Electricity Sector Reform Performance in Sub-Saharan Africa: A Parametric Distance Function Approach," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-29, March.
    5. Cunha, Bruno Queiroz & Pereira, Ana Karine & Gomide, Alexandre de Ávila, 2017. "State capacity and utilities regulation in Brazil: Exploring bureaucracy," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 116-126.
    6. Santiago Urbiztondo & Fernando Navajas & Daniel Artana, 1998. "La autonomía de los entes reguladores argentinos: Agua y cloacas, gas natural, energía eléctrica y telecomunicaciones," Research Department Publications 3038, Inter-American Development Bank, Research Department.
    7. Bertoméu-Sánchez, Salvador & Camos, Daniel & Estache, Antonio, 2018. "Do economic regulatory agencies matter to private-sector involvement in water utilities in developing countries?," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 153-163.
    8. EZZAT Riham Ahmed, 2015. "Paving the Way for Better Telecom Performance: Evidence from the Telecommunication Sector in MENA Countries," Review of Network Economics, De Gruyter, vol. 14(3), pages 157-199, September.
    9. Fabrizio Gilardi, 2005. "The Institutional Foundations of Regulatory Capitalism: The Diffusion of Independent Regulatory Agencies in Western Europe," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 598(1), pages 84-101, March.
    10. Ghosh, Ranjan & Kathuria, Vinish, 2016. "The effect of regulatory governance on efficiency of thermal power generation in India: A stochastic frontier analysis," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 11-24.
    11. Tobias Kretschmer & Hans-Ulrich Küpper & Burkhard Pedell, 2011. "Bedingungen und Prinzipien einer konsistenten Regulierung," Schmalenbach Journal of Business Research, Springer, vol. 63(64), pages 1-31, January.
    12. Abbott, Malcolm & Cohen, Bruce, 2011. "Utility regulation--The scope and structure of electrical safety regulation," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(9), pages 4956-4961, September.
    13. Bickenbach, Frank, 1999. "Regulierung und Wettbewerb im Bereich der Netzinfrastrukturen: Begründung, Regeln und Institutionen," Kiel Working Papers 910, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel).
    14. Mota, R.L., 2003. "The Restructuring and Privatisation of Electricity Distribution and Supply Business in Brazil: A Social Cost-Benefit Analysis," Cambridge Working Papers in Economics 0309, Faculty of Economics, University of Cambridge.
    15. Estache, Antonio & Wren-Lewis, Liam, 2010. "What Anti-Corruption Policy Can Learn from Theories of Sector Regulation," CEPR Discussion Papers 8082, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    16. Nillesen , P.H.L. & Pollitt, M.G., 2004. "The Consequences for Consumer Welfare of the 2001-2003 Electricity Distribution Price Review in The Netherlands," Cambridge Working Papers in Economics 0446, Faculty of Economics, University of Cambridge.
    17. Sampaio, Patrícia Regina Pinheiro & Daychoum, Mariam Tchepurnaya, 2017. "Two decades of rail regulatory reform in Brazil (1996–2016)," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 93-103.
    18. Stern, J., 2000. "Electricity and telecommunications regulatory institutions in small and developing countries," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 9(3), pages 131-157, September.
    19. Monasso, Ton & van Leijden, Fabian, 2007. "Telecommunication regulation as a game: deepening theoretical understanding," MPRA Paper 7625, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    20. Eva Niesten, 2006. "Regulatory Institutions And Governance Transformations In Liberalising Electricity Industries," Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 77(3), pages 291-307, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:elg:eechap:3926_6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Darrel McCalla (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.e-elgar.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.