IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/b/diw/diwpok/pbk48.html
   My bibliography  Save this book

Kultur- und Kreativberufler und deren Erwerbsrealitäten: Berlin im regionalen Vergleich ; Endbericht ; Forschungsprojekt im Auftrag der Berliner Senatsverwaltung für Wirtschaft, Technologie und Frauen

Author

Listed:
  • Marco Mundelius

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Marco Mundelius, 2009. "Kultur- und Kreativberufler und deren Erwerbsrealitäten: Berlin im regionalen Vergleich ; Endbericht ; Forschungsprojekt im Auftrag der Berliner Senatsverwaltung für Wirtschaft, Technologie und Frauen," DIW Berlin: Politikberatung kompakt, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research, volume 48, number pbk48, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:diw:diwpok:pbk48
    Note: II, 32 p.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.diw.de/documents/publikationen/73/diw_01.c.95114.de/diwkompakt_2009-048.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. David Throsby, 1996. "Economic circumstances of the performing artist: Baumol and Bowen thirty years on," Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer;The Association for Cultural Economics International, vol. 20(3), pages 225-240, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Bögenhold, Dieter & Fachinger, Uwe, 2012. "Unternehmertum: Unterschiedliche Facetten selbstständiger Berufstätigkeit [Entrepreneurship: Diverse aspects of self-employment]," MPRA Paper 51459, University Library of Munich, Germany.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kay H. Hofmann, 2021. "Television Serials as Career Stepping Stones: An Empirical Analysis of Employment Paths of Professional Actors," Schmalenbach Journal of Business Research, Springer, vol. 73(3), pages 501-525, December.
    2. Музычук, 2012. "Должно Ли Государство Финансировать Культуру? (Научный Доклад) [Should the state finance culture?]," Working papers a:pmu374:1, Institute of Economics.
    3. van der Ploeg, Frederick, 2006. "The Making of Cultural Policy: A European Perspective," Handbook of the Economics of Art and Culture, in: V.A. Ginsburgh & D. Throsby (ed.), Handbook of the Economics of Art and Culture, edition 1, volume 1, chapter 34, pages 1183-1221, Elsevier.
    4. Merijn Rengers & Erik Plug, 2001. "Private or Public?," Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer;The Association for Cultural Economics International, vol. 25(1), pages 1-20, February.
    5. Amy Whitaker, 2021. "Economies of scope in artists’ incubator projects," Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer;The Association for Cultural Economics International, vol. 45(4), pages 613-631, December.
    6. Trine Bille & Knut Løyland & Anders Holm, 2017. "Work for Passion or Money? Variations in Artists’ Labor Supply," Kyklos, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 70(3), pages 347-380, August.
    7. Haak, Carroll, 2005. "Künstler zwischen selbständiger und abhängiger Erwerbsarbeit," Discussion Papers, Research Unit: Labor Market Policy and Employment SP I 2005-107, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
    8. Luis Antonio Palma M. & Luis Fernando Aguado Q., 2010. "Economía de la cultura. Una nueva área de especialización de la economía," Revista de Economía Institucional, Universidad Externado de Colombia - Facultad de Economía, vol. 12(22), pages 129-165, January-J.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:diw:diwpok:pbk48. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Bibliothek (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/diwbede.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.