IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/b/cup/cbooks/9781108494854.html
   My bibliography  Save this book

Grow the Pie

Author

Listed:
  • Edmans,Alex

Abstract

A Financial Times Book of the Year 2020! What is a responsible business? Common wisdom is that it's one that sacrifices profit for social outcomes. But while it's crucial for companies to serve society, they also have a duty to generate profit for investors - savers, retirees, and pension funds. Based on the highest-quality evidence and real-life examples spanning industries and countries, Alex Edmans shows that it's not an either-or choice - companies can create both profit and social value. The most successful companies don't target profit directly, but are driven by purpose - the desire to serve a societal need and contribute to human betterment. The book explains how to embed purpose into practice so that it's more than just a mission statement, and discusses the critical role of working collaboratively with a company's investors, employees, and customers. Rigorous research also uncovers surprising results on how executive pay, shareholder activism, and share buybacks can be used for the common good.

Suggested Citation

  • Edmans,Alex, 2020. "Grow the Pie," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9781108494854.
    • Handle: RePEc:cup:cbooks:9781108494854
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Other versions of this item:

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Pluess, Karen & Sutcliffe, Katy, 2021. "Perspectives on Corporate, Social, and Employee Purpose among Investment Bankers: A Qualitative Research Study," OSF Preprints uwejb, Center for Open Science.
    2. Fang, Mingyue & Nie, Huihua & Shen, Xinyi, 2023. "Can enterprise digitization improve ESG performance?," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 118(C).
    3. Eleonora Broccardo & Oliver D. Hart & Luigi Zingales, 2020. "Exit vs. Voice," Working Papers 2020-114, Becker Friedman Institute for Research In Economics.
    4. Alex Edmans, 2022. "The purpose of a finance professor," Financial Management, Financial Management Association International, vol. 51(1), pages 3-26, March.
    5. Cave, Martin & Wright, Janet, 2021. "How can the concept of public value influence U.K. utility regulation?," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).
    6. Broccardo, Eleonora & Hart, Oliver D. & Zingales, Luigi, 2021. "Exit vs. Voice," Working Papers 302, The University of Chicago Booth School of Business, George J. Stigler Center for the Study of the Economy and the State.
    7. Hart, Oliver D. & Zingales, Luigi, 2022. "The New Corporate Governance," Working Papers 317, The University of Chicago Booth School of Business, George J. Stigler Center for the Study of the Economy and the State.
    8. Dayana Jimenez & Isabel B. Franco & Tahlia Smith, 2021. "A Review of Corporate Purpose: An Approach to Actioning the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-21, April.
    9. Mu-Jeung Yang, 2021. "The interdependence imperative: business strategy, complementarities, and economic policy," Oxford Review of Economic Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 37(2), pages 392-415.
    10. Sven Kunisch & Markus Menz & David Collis, 2020. "Corporate headquarters in the twenty-first century: an organization design perspective," Journal of Organization Design, Springer;Organizational Design Community, vol. 9(1), pages 1-32, December.
    11. Patrick Bolton & Zachery Halem & Marcin Kacperczyk, 2022. "The Financial Cost of Carbon," Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, Morgan Stanley, vol. 34(2), pages 17-29, June.
    12. Jonathan M. Karpoff, 2021. "On a stakeholder model of corporate governance," Financial Management, Financial Management Association International, vol. 50(2), pages 321-343, June.
    13. Alex Edmans, 2020. "Company purpose and profit need not be in conflict if we ‘grow the pie’," Economic Affairs, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 40(2), pages 287-294, June.
    14. Andrea Roncella & Ignacio Ferrero, 2022. "The Ethics of Financial Market Making and Its Implications for High-Frequency Trading," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 181(1), pages 139-151, November.
    15. Jaehwi Jeong & Donseung Choi & Jangsoon Kim, 2022. "When Digital Capabilities of MNC Subsidiaries Matters: The Moderating Effect of Subsidiary Autonomy in Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-13, November.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:cbooks:9781108494854. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ruth Austin (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.