IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/b/ces/ifodrs/83.html

Betrachtung und Analyse von Regionalindikatoren zur Vorbereitung des GRW-Fördergebietes ab 2021 (Raumbeobachtung)

Author

Listed:
  • Steffen Maretzke
  • Joachim Ragnitz
  • Gerhard Untiedt

Abstract

Die Bundesregierung hat in ihrem Koalitionsvertrag vereinbart, die künftige Regionalförderung nach einem gesamtdeutsch ausgerichteten Indikatorensystem neu zu gestalten. Vorbild soll dabei die Förderung entsprechend der Gemeinschaftsaufgabe „Verbesserung der regionalen Wirtschaftsstruktur" (GRW) sein. Die GRW-Indikatorik zur Abgrenzung strukturschwacher und deshalb förderberechtigter Regionen umfasst derzeit einen Einkommensindikator (Bruttolohn je SV-pflichtigen Beschäftigten), zwei Arbeitsmarktindikatoren (Arbeitslosenquote und mittelfristige Prognose der Erwerbstätigenentwicklung) sowie einen zusammengefassten Infrastrukturindikator. Sie weist jedoch eine Reihe von konzeptionellen Schwächen auf und sollte deswegen überarbeitet werden. Nach Untersuchung einer Vielzahl alternativer Indikatoren wird vorgeschlagen, künftig als Einkommensindikator das Bruttoinlandsprodukt je Erwerbstätigen und als Arbeitsmarktindikator die breiter abgegrenzte Unterbeschäftigungsquote zu verwenden. Dies könnte durch einen Indikator zur demografischen Entwicklung (z. B. Projektion der Einwohnerentwicklung bis zum Jahr 2035) und einen modifizierten Infrastrukturindikator ergänzt werden. Auch bei Anwendung eines solchen Indikatorensystems werden vor allem ostdeutsche Regionen, aber auch altindustrielle Gebiete in Westdeutschland als förderwürdig klassifiziert.

Suggested Citation

  • Steffen Maretzke & Joachim Ragnitz & Gerhard Untiedt, 2019. "Betrachtung und Analyse von Regionalindikatoren zur Vorbereitung des GRW-Fördergebietes ab 2021 (Raumbeobachtung)," ifo Dresden Studien, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, number 83, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:ces:ifodrs:83
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.ifo.de/DocDL/ifo-Dresden-Studien_83_0.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zarth, Michael & Crome, Barbara, 1999. "Die regionale Infrastrukturausstattung als Indikator für die Auswahl regionalpolitischer Fördergebiete," Mitteilungen aus der Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsforschung, Institut für Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsforschung (IAB), Nürnberg [Institute for Employment Research, Nuremberg, Germany], vol. 32(4), pages 618-630.
    2. Wolfgang Eggert & Maximilian Von Ehrlich & Robert Fenge & Günther König, 2007. "Konvergenz‐ und Wachstumseffekte der europäischen Regionalpolitik in Deutschland," Perspektiven der Wirtschaftspolitik, Verein für Socialpolitik, vol. 8(2), pages 130-146, March.
    3. Jens Südekum & Wolfgang Dauth & Sebastian Findeisen, 2017. "Verlierer(-regionen) der Globalisierung in Deutschland: Wer? Warum? Was tun? [Losing from Globalisation in Germany: Who? Why? What Now?]," Wirtschaftsdienst, Springer;ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 97(1), pages 24-31, January.
    4. Björn Alecke & Timo Mitze & Gerhard Untiedt, 2013. "Growth effects of regional policy in Germany: results from a spatially augmented multiplicative interaction model," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 50(2), pages 535-554, April.
    5. Eckey, Hans-Friedrich & Schwengler, Barbara & Türck, Matthias, 2007. "Vergleich von deutschen Arbeitsmarktregionen," IAB-Discussion Paper 200703, Institut für Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsforschung (IAB), Nürnberg [Institute for Employment Research, Nuremberg, Germany].
    6. Schwengler, Barbara & Bennewitz, Emanuel, 2013. "Arbeitsmarkt- und Einkommensindikatoren für die Neuabgrenzung des GRW-Regionalfördergebietes ab 2014 : Gutachten im Rahmen der Gemeinschaftsaufgabe "Verbesserung der regionalen Wirtschaftsstruktur" (GRW). Studie im Auftrag des Bundesministe," IAB-Forschungsbericht 201313, Institut für Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsforschung (IAB), Nürnberg [Institute for Employment Research, Nuremberg, Germany].
    7. Alecke, Björn & Mitze, Timo & Untiedt, Gerhard, 2010. "Regionale Wachstumseffekte der GRW-Förderung?: Eine räumlich-ökonometrische Analyse auf Basis deutscher Arbeitsmarktregionen [Regional Growth Effects of Private Sector Investment Grants in Germany?: A spatial econometric analysis for German labour," MPRA Paper 22643, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Marco Hölzel & Walter Timo de Vries, 2021. "Digitization as a Driver fur Rural Development—An Indicative Description of German Coworking Space Users," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-21, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jonathan Eberle & Thomas Brenner, 2016. "More bucks, more growth, more justice? The effects of regional structural funds on regional economic growth and convergence in Germany," Working Papers on Innovation and Space 2016-01, Philipps University Marburg, Department of Geography.
    2. K. Haaf & C.J.M. Kool, 2017. "Determinants of regional growth and convergence in Germany," Working Papers 17-12, Utrecht School of Economics.
    3. Gruševaja, Marina & Pusch, Toralf, 2011. "How does Institutional Setting Affect the Impact of EU Structural Funds on Economic Cohesion? New Evidence from Central and Eastern Europe," IWH Discussion Papers 17/2011, Halle Institute for Economic Research (IWH).
    4. Filip Hruza & Stanislav Volcík & Jan Žácek, 2019. "The Impact of EU Funds on Regional Economic Growth of the Czech Republic," Czech Journal of Economics and Finance (Finance a uver), Charles University Prague, Faculty of Social Sciences, vol. 69(1), pages 76-94, February.
    5. Mustra Vinko & Malesevic Perovic Lena & Golem Silvia, 2014. "Social attitudes and regional inequalities," Экономика региона, CyberLeninka;Федеральное государственное бюджетное учреждение науки «Институт экономики Уральского отделения Российской академии наук», issue 1, pages 66-73.
    6. Joana Mendonça & Christoph Grimpe, 2016. "Skills and regional entrepreneurship capital formation: a comparison between Germany and Portugal," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 41(6), pages 1440-1456, December.
    7. Julia Kowalewski, 2011. "Specialization and employment development in Germany: An analysis at the regional level," Papers in Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 90(4), pages 789-811, November.
    8. Mohl, Philipp & Hagen, Tobias, 2008. "Does EU Cohesion Policy Promote Growth? Evidence from Regional Data and Alternative Econometric Approaches," ZEW Discussion Papers 08-086, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.
    9. Philipp Breidenbach & Timo Mitze & Christoph Schmidt, 2011. "Evaluating EU Regional Policy: Many Empirical Specifications, One (Unpleasant) Result," ERSA conference papers ersa11p1144, European Regional Science Association.
    10. Matthias Bürger, 2011. "Dynamics of Collaborative Invention Tracking Growth of Cooperative and Total Patents in the Region," Jena Economics Research Papers 2011-045, Friedrich-Schiller-University Jena.
    11. Ugo Fratesi & Giovanni Perucca, 2014. "Territorial Capital and the Effectiveness of Cohesion Policies: an Assessment for CEE Regions," INVESTIGACIONES REGIONALES - Journal of REGIONAL RESEARCH, Asociación Española de Ciencia Regional, issue 29, pages 165-191.
    12. Carlos San Juan Mesonada & Carlos Sunyer Manteiga, 2021. "European Structural Funds and Resilient and Recovery Facility Governance," EconPol Working Paper 67, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich.
    13. Sascha Sardadvar & Christian Reiner, 2021. "Austrian regions in the age of globalisation: Trade exposure, urban dynamics and structural change," Regional Science Policy & Practice, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 13(3), pages 603-643, June.
    14. Lammers, Konrad & Niebuhr, Annekatrin, 2002. "Erfolgskontrolle in der deutschen Regionalpolitik: Uberblick und Bewertung," Report Series 26089, Hamburg Institute of International Economics.
    15. Breidenbach, Philipp & Mitze, Timo & Schmidt, Christoph M., 2016. "EU structural funds and regional income convergence: A sobering experience," Ruhr Economic Papers 608, RWI - Leibniz-Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung, Ruhr-University Bochum, TU Dortmund University, University of Duisburg-Essen.
    16. Brachert, Matthias & Brautzsch, Hans-Ulrich & Dettmann, Eva & Giebler, Alexander & Schneider, Lutz & Titze, Mirko, 2020. ""Evaluation der Gemeinschaftsaufgabe 'Verbesserung der regionalen Wirtschaftsstruktur' (GRW)" durch einzelbetriebliche Erfolgskontrolle: Endbericht," IWH Online 5/2020, Halle Institute for Economic Research (IWH).
    17. Corinna Kleinert & Alexander Vosseler & Uwe Blien, 2018. "Classifying vocational training markets," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 61(1), pages 31-48, July.
    18. Norbert Hiller & Oliver Lerbs, 2015. "The capitalization of non-market attributes into regional housing rents and wages: evidence on German functional labor market areas," Review of Regional Research: Jahrbuch für Regionalwissenschaft, Springer;Gesellschaft für Regionalforschung (GfR), vol. 35(1), pages 49-72, February.
    19. Riccardo Crescenzi & Mara Giua, 2016. "The EU Cohesion Policy in context: Does a bottom-up approach work in all regions?," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 48(11), pages 2340-2357, November.
    20. Florian MARIN, 2019. "The Problems of Absorption of the European Structural and Investment Funds Related to the Cohesion Policy during the Programming Period 2014-2020," REVISTA DE MANAGEMENT COMPARAT INTERNATIONAL/REVIEW OF INTERNATIONAL COMPARATIVE MANAGEMENT, Faculty of Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 20(5), pages 530-543, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • R11 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General Regional Economics - - - Regional Economic Activity: Growth, Development, Environmental Issues, and Changes

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ces:ifodrs:83. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Klaus Wohlrabe (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ifooode.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.