IDEAS home Printed from
   My bibliography  Save this book

Regional Water and Soil Assessment for Managing Sustainable Agriculture in China and Australia


  • Anonymous
  • Rui, Li
  • Walker, Joe
  • Fitzpatrick, Rob W.
  • Changming, Liu


Many environmental problems are caused by changes in aspects of the hydrological cycle. Water balance modelling combined with field experiments can give us a better understanding of the components of the hydrological cycle from which to develop appropriate management options. Water balance models can be constructed at any level of complexity. In simple آucket٠models only the most important processes are represented. When appropriately used, bucket models can provide useful insights into the functional behaviour of a system. Complex models are needed to understand complex feedbacks and interactions among different processes of the system. However, increasing the complexity of a model does not necessarily lead to a more accurate model and it is essential that model complexity matches the availability of data. The key to successful water balance modelling is to have a clearly defined objective and to select an appropriate model. This chapter outlines the principles of water balance modelling and explains how models can be used in crop management.

Suggested Citation

  • Anonymous & Rui, Li & Walker, Joe & Fitzpatrick, Rob W. & Changming, Liu, 2002. "Regional Water and Soil Assessment for Managing Sustainable Agriculture in China and Australia," Monographs, Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research, number 114792.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:aciarm:114792

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    References listed on IDEAS

    1. Kalinganire, Antoine & Pinyopusarerk, Khongsak, 2000. "Chukrasia: Biology, Cultivation and Utilisation," Technical Reports 113796, Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)


    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.

    Cited by:

    1. Wang, Xuehong & Bennett, Jeff & Xie, Chen & Zhang, Zhitao & Liang, Dan, 2007. "Estimating non-market environmental benefits of the Conversion of Cropland to Forest and Grassland Program: A choice modeling approach," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 63(1), pages 114-125, June.

    More about this item


    Resource /Energy Economics and Policy;


    Access and download statistics


    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:aciarm:114792. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (AgEcon Search). General contact details of provider: .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.