IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Login to save this article or follow this journal

Kritik am lohnpolitischen Konzept des Sachverständigenrats

  • Horn, Gustav A.
  • Logeay, Camille

In seinem jüngsten Jahresgutachten hat der Sachverständigenrat zur Begutachtung der gesamtwirtschaftlichen Entwicklung seine lohnpolitischen Vorstellungen expliziert. Gustav A. Horn und Camille Logeay bezweifeln im folgenden Beitrag, dass das Modell des Sachverständigenrates konsistent und für die Lohnpolitik bei Unterbeschäftigung relevant ist. Im Anschluss daran eine Erwiderung von Jens Ulbrich und Stephan Kohns vom Mitarbeiterstab des Sachverständigenrates.

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL:
Download Restriction: no

Article provided by ZBW – German National Library of Economics / Leibniz Information Centre for Economics in its journal Wirtschaftsdienst.

Volume (Year): 84 (2004)
Issue (Month): 4 ()
Pages: 236-242

in new window

Handle: RePEc:zbw:wirtdi:42392
Contact details of provider: Postal: Düsternbrooker Weg 120, 24105 Kiel / Neuer Jungfernstieg 21, 20354 Hamburg
Phone: +49 431 8814-1
Fax: +49 431 8814-520
Web page:

More information through EDIRC

No references listed on IDEAS
You can help add them by filling out this form.

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:wirtdi:42392. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (ZBW - German National Library of Economics)

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.