IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/zbw/iprjir/315586.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Civil society's role in constitutionalising global content governance

Author

Listed:
  • Palladino, Nicola
  • Redeker, Dennis
  • Celeste, Edoardo

Abstract

This article examines global content governance on social media platforms through the lens of digital constitutionalism, which explores how fundamental rights can be embedded within the socio-technical architecture of digital technologies. It highlights the often-overlooked role of civil society in articulating digital rights and principles. In addition to performing a watchdog function and raising awareness about the human rights implications of digital technologies, we argue that civil society organisations play a constitutionalising role, acting as a bridge between international human rights law and platform governance. Above all, by engaging in global conversations, civil society organisations may facilitate the emergence and dissemination of a set of shared principles and rules. By conducting a semantic network analysis on 44 digital bills of rights that were drafted by civil society organisations and addressed content governance issues, the article aims to identify emerging principles as well as to study their alignment with human rights standards, their relationships, and evolution over time. The findings highlight how civil society initiatives have effectively led to a convergence of expectations around a common set of principles for content moderation, which could both pressure and support platforms and policymakers to strike a balance between freedom of expression and protecting people and democratic institutions from harm and disinformation.

Suggested Citation

  • Palladino, Nicola & Redeker, Dennis & Celeste, Edoardo, 2025. "Civil society's role in constitutionalising global content governance," Internet Policy Review: Journal on Internet Regulation, Alexander von Humboldt Institute for Internet and Society (HIIG), Berlin, vol. 14(1), pages 1-31.
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:iprjir:315586
    DOI: 10.14763/2025.1.1830
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/315586/1/1923072900.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.14763/2025.1.1830?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jeanette Hofmann, 2016. "Multi-stakeholderism in Internet governance: putting a fiction into practice," Journal of Cyber Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 1(1), pages 29-49, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Levinson, Nanette S., 2021. "Idea entrepreneurs: The United Nations Open-Ended Working Group & cybersecurity," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 45(6).
    2. Pohle, Julia, 2016. "Multistakeholder governance processes as production sites: enhanced cooperation "in the making"," Internet Policy Review: Journal on Internet Regulation, Alexander von Humboldt Institute for Internet and Society (HIIG), Berlin, vol. 5(3), pages 1-19.
    3. Pohle, Julia & Thiel, Thorsten, 2021. "Digital Sovereignty," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, pages 47-67.
    4. Amber van den Akker & Alice Fabbri & Scott Slater & Anna B. Gilmore & Cecile Knai & Harry Rutter, 2024. "Mapping actor networks in global multi-stakeholder initiatives for food system transformation," Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, Springer;The International Society for Plant Pathology, vol. 16(5), pages 1223-1234, October.
    5. Pohle, Julia, 2016. "Multistakeholder governance processes as production sites: enhanced cooperation "in the making"," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 5(3), pages 1-19.
    6. Thiel, Thorsten, 2019. "Souveränität: Dynamisierung und Kontestation in der digitalen Konstellation," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, pages 47-60.
    7. Monsees, Linda, 2020. "Cryptoparties: Empowerment in internet security?," Internet Policy Review: Journal on Internet Regulation, Alexander von Humboldt Institute for Internet and Society (HIIG), Berlin, vol. 9(4), pages 1-19.
    8. Tjahja, Nadia & Meyer, Trisha & Shahin, Jamal, 2022. "Who do you think you are? Individual stakeholder identification and mobility at the Internet Governance Forum," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 46(10).
    9. Pohle, Julia & Thiel, Thorsten, 2022. "Soberanía digital," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, issue Número Es, pages 1-1.
    10. Pohle, Julia & Voelsen, Daniel, 2022. "Das Netz und die Netze. Vom Wandel des Internets und der globalen digitalen Ordnung [The net and the networks. Transformations of the Internet and the global digital order]," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 32(3), pages 455-487.
    11. Grover, Rohan, 2022. "The geopolitics of digital rights activism: Evaluating civil society's role in the promises of multistakeholder internet governance," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 46(10).
    12. Pohle, Julia & Thiel, Thorsten, 2020. "Digital sovereignty," Internet Policy Review: Journal on Internet Regulation, Alexander von Humboldt Institute for Internet and Society (HIIG), Berlin, vol. 9(4), pages 1-19.
    13. Palladino, Nicola, 2021. "The role of epistemic communities in the “constitutionalization” of internet governance: The example of the European Commission High-Level Expert Group on Artificial Intelligence," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 45(6).
    14. Christian Djeffal, 2022. "Children’s Rights by Design and Internet Governance: Revisiting General Comment No. 25 (2021) on Children’s Rights in Relation to the Digital Environment," Laws, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-9, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:iprjir:315586. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://policyreview.info/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.