IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/zbw/iprjir/250402.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Critical questions for Facebook's virtual reality: Data, power and the metaverse

Author

Listed:
  • Egliston, Ben
  • Carter, Marcus

Abstract

Virtual Reality (VR) represents an emerging class of spatial computing technology reliant upon the capture and processing of data about the user (such as their body and its interface with the hardware), or their surrounding environment. Much like digital media more generally, there are growing concerns of who stands to benefit from VR as a data-intensive form of technology, and where its potential data-borne harms may lie. Drawing from critical data studies, we examine the case of Facebook's Oculus VR-a market leading VR technology, central to their metaverse ambitions. Through this case, we argue that VR as a data-intensive device is not one of unalloyed benefit, but one fraught with power inequity-one that has the potential to exacerbate wealth inequity, institute algorithmic bias, and bring about new forms of digital exclusion. We contend that policy to date has had limited engagement with VR, and that regulatory intervention will be needed as VR becomes more widely adopted in society.

Suggested Citation

  • Egliston, Ben & Carter, Marcus, 2021. "Critical questions for Facebook's virtual reality: Data, power and the metaverse," Internet Policy Review: Journal on Internet Regulation, Alexander von Humboldt Institute for Internet and Society (HIIG), Berlin, vol. 10(4), pages 1-23.
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:iprjir:250402
    DOI: 10.14763/2021.4.1610
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/250402/1/1794123032.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.14763/2021.4.1610?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Couldry, Nick & Mejias, Ulises, 2019. "Making data colonialism liveable: how might data's social order be regulated?," Internet Policy Review: Journal on Internet Regulation, Alexander von Humboldt Institute for Internet and Society (HIIG), Berlin, vol. 8(2), pages 1-16.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Goldberg, Mitchell & Schär, Fabian, 2023. "Metaverse governance: An empirical analysis of voting within Decentralized Autonomous Organizations," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).
    2. Sergio Barta & Raquel Gurrea & Carlos Flavián, 2023. "Telepresence in live-stream shopping: An experimental study comparing Instagram and the metaverse," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 33(1), pages 1-21, December.
    3. Paul P. Momtaz, 2022. "Some Very Simple Economics of Web3 and the Metaverse," FinTech, MDPI, vol. 1(3), pages 1-10, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:iprjir:250402. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://policyreview.info/ .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.