IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/zbw/iprjir/245344.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Policy strategies for value-based technology standards

Author

Listed:
  • Andersdotter, Amelia
  • Olejnik, Lukasz

Abstract

Formal, government-driven technology standards developing organisations (SDOs) traditionally serve as platforms for compromise between existing national standards. In the past decade, the recognition of the driving role of SDOs in innovation has made them surface into the public debate. The influence of the work overseen by non-formal, industry-driven standards bodies including the W3C, the IETF or the IEEE is increasingly acknowledged as having both direct and indirect impacts on societies, modes of work, technology policy or politics. Starting from the European Commission's formulation of "European values", we map the interplay between enforcement of codified societal norms and industry priorities.This paper identifies policy interventions that may lead to a positive influence on the development and adoption of technology standards that bring benefit to users.

Suggested Citation

  • Andersdotter, Amelia & Olejnik, Lukasz, 2021. "Policy strategies for value-based technology standards," Internet Policy Review: Journal on Internet Regulation, Alexander von Humboldt Institute for Internet and Society (HIIG), Berlin, vol. 10(3), pages 1-26.
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:iprjir:245344
    DOI: 10.14763/2021.3.1573
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/245344/1/177570209X.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.14763/2021.3.1573?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dominique Lazanski, 2019. "Governance in international technical standards-making: a tripartite model," Journal of Cyber Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 4(3), pages 362-379, September.
    2. He Li & Lu Yu & Wu He, 2019. "The Impact of GDPR on Global Technology Development," Journal of Global Information Technology Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(1), pages 1-6, January.
    3. Delvenne, Pierre & Parotte, Céline, 2019. "Breaking the myth of neutrality: Technology Assessment has politics, Technology Assessment as politics," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 64-72.
    4. Barrios Villarreal,Andrea, 2018. "International Standardization and the Agreement on Technical Barriers to Trade," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9781108474368.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ibrahim A. Adekunle & Olumuyiwa G. Yinusa & Tolulope O. Williams & Rahmon A. Folami, 2021. "On the Determinant of Financial Development in Africa: Geography, Institutions and Macroeconomic Policy Relevance," Research Africa Network Working Papers 21/054, Research Africa Network (RAN).
    2. Karaulova, Maria & Edler, Jakob, 2023. "Bringing research into policy: Understanding context-specific requirements for productive knowledge brokering in legislatures," Discussion Papers "Innovation Systems and Policy Analysis" 77, Fraunhofer Institute for Systems and Innovation Research (ISI).
    3. Idil ATASU & Aslıhan NASIR & Hande TURKER, 2021. "What is Important for Consumers in Wearable Medical Device (WMD) Usage Intention?," Journal of Emerging Trends in Marketing and Management, The Bucharest University of Economic Studies, vol. 1(1), pages 40-48, August.
    4. Tahal Radek & Formánek Tomáš, 2020. "Reflection of GDPR by the Czech Population," Management & Marketing, Sciendo, vol. 15(1), pages 78-94, March.
    5. Gregor Dorfleitner & Lars Hornuf & Julia Kreppmeier, 2021. "Promise not Fulfilled: FinTech Data Privacy, and the GDPR," CESifo Working Paper Series 9359, CESifo.
    6. Anjuli Franz & Alexander Benlian, 2022. "Exploring interdependent privacy – Empirical insights into users’ protection of others’ privacy on online platforms," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 32(4), pages 2293-2309, December.
    7. Alan A. Ahi & Noemi Sinkovics & Rudolf R. Sinkovics, 2023. "E-commerce Policy and the Global Economy: A Path to More Inclusive Development?," Management International Review, Springer, vol. 63(1), pages 27-56, February.
    8. Claire M. Segijn & Joanna Strycharz & Amy Riegelman & Cody Hennesy, 2021. "A Literature Review of Personalization Transparency and Control: Introducing the Transparency–Awareness–Control Framework," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 9(4), pages 120-133.
    9. Christoph Kehl & Steffen Albrecht & Pauline Riousset & Arnold Sauter, 2021. "Goodbye Expert-Based Policy Advice? Challenges in Advising Governmental Institutions in Times of Transformation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-16, December.
    10. Joeva Sean Rock & Matthew A. Schnurr & Ann Kingiri & Dominic Glover & Glenn Davis Stone & Adrian Ely & Klara Fischer, 2023. "Beyond the Genome: Genetically Modified Crops in Africa and the Implications for Genome Editing," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 54(1), pages 117-142, January.
    11. Barr-Kumarakulasinghe Cheryl & Boon-Kwee Ng, 2022. "Protecting the Unprotected Consumer Data in Internet of Things: Current Scenario of Data Governance in Malaysia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-25, August.
    12. Garrett A. Johnson, 2022. "Economic Research on Privacy Regulation: Lessons from the GDPR and Beyond," NBER Chapters, in: The Economics of Privacy, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    13. Kraus, Sascha & Kumar, Satish & Lim, Weng Marc & Kaur, Jaspreet & Sharma, Anuj & Schiavone, Francesco, 2023. "From moon landing to metaverse: Tracing the evolution of Technological Forecasting and Social Change," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
    14. Gregor Dorfleitner & Lars Hornuf & Julia Kreppmeier, 2023. "Promise not fulfilled: FinTech, data privacy, and the GDPR," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 33(1), pages 1-29, December.
    15. Mauro Luis Gotsch & Marcus Schögel, 2023. "Addressing the privacy paradox on the organizational level: review and future directions," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 73(1), pages 263-296, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:iprjir:245344. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://policyreview.info/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.