IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wsi/tijaxx/v56y2021i01ns1094406021500013.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Corporate Board Committees and Corporate Outcomes: An International Systematic Literature Review and Agenda for Future Research

Author

Listed:
  • Mohammed A. Alhossini

    (Centre for Research in Accounting, Accountability, and Governance (CRAAG), Department of Accounting, Southampton Business School, University of Southampton, Southampton SO17 1BJ, UK†Shaqra University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia)

  • Collins G. Ntim

    (Centre for Research in Accounting, Accountability, and Governance (CRAAG), Department of Accounting, Southampton Business School, University of Southampton, Southampton SO17 1BJ, UK)

  • Alaa Mansour Zalata

    (Centre for Research in Accounting, Accountability, and Governance (CRAAG), Department of Accounting, Southampton Business School, University of Southampton, Southampton SO17 1BJ, UK‡Faculty of Commerce, Mansoura University, El-Mansoura, Egypt)

Abstract

This paper comprehensively reviews the current body of international accounting literature regarding advisory/monitoring committees and corporate outcomes. Specifically, it synthesizes, appraises, and extends current knowledge on the (a) theoretical (i.e., economic, accounting/corporate governance, sociological and socio-psychological) perspectives and (b) empirical evidence of the observable and less visible attributes at both the individual and committee levels and their link with a wide range (financial/non-financial) of corporate outcomes. Using the systematic literature review method, 304 articles from 59 journals in the fields of accounting and finance that were published between January 1992 and December 2018 are reviewed. The main findings are as follows. First and theoretically, agency theory is the most dominant applied theory/studies with no application of theory at all (descriptive), while the application of integrated theoretical frameworks is lacking in the reviewed articles. Secondly, the existing empirical evidence focusses excessively on (a) monitoring instead of advisory committees and (b) observable rather than less visible committee attributes. Thirdly, scarcity of cross-country studies along with methodological limitations relating to measurement inconsistencies, insufficiency of variables, and dominance of quantitative studies, among others, are identified. Finally, promising future research avenues are outlined.

Suggested Citation

  • Mohammed A. Alhossini & Collins G. Ntim & Alaa Mansour Zalata, 2021. "Corporate Board Committees and Corporate Outcomes: An International Systematic Literature Review and Agenda for Future Research," The International Journal of Accounting (TIJA), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 56(01), pages 1-73, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:wsi:tijaxx:v:56:y:2021:i:01:n:s1094406021500013
    DOI: 10.1142/S1094406021500013
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.worldscientific.com/doi/abs/10.1142/S1094406021500013
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1142/S1094406021500013?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Pei‐Chi Kelly Hsiao & Charl de Villiers & Claire Horner & Hein Oosthuizen, 2022. "A review and synthesis of contemporary sustainability accounting research and the development of a research agenda," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 62(4), pages 4453-4483, December.
    2. Douglas A. Adu & Antoinette Flynn & Colette Grey, 2022. "Executive compensation and sustainable business practices: The moderating role of sustainability‐based compensation," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(3), pages 698-736, March.
    3. Lagasio, Valentina & Brogi, Marina & Gallucci, Carmen & Santulli, Rosalia, 2023. "May board committees reduce the probability of financial distress? A survival analysis on Italian listed companies," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 87(C).
    4. Sattar Khan & Yasir Kamal & Shahid Hussain & Muhammad Abbas, 2022. "Corporate governance looking back to look forward in Pakistan: a review, synthesis and future research agenda," Future Business Journal, Springer, vol. 8(1), pages 1-32, December.
    5. Shuchi Pahuja & Anita Agrawal, 2023. "Board Attributes and Corporate Social Responsibility: A Systematic Literature Review and Future Research Perspectives," Indian Journal of Corporate Governance, , vol. 16(1), pages 108-138, June.
    6. Bogdan Aurelian Mihail & Dalina Dumitrescu & Carmen Daniela Micu & Adriana Lobda, 2021. "The Impact of Board Diversity, CEO Characteristics, and Board Committees on Financial Performance in the Case of Romanian Companies," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-16, December.
    7. Thi H.H. Nguyen & Mohamed H. Elmagrhi & Collins G. Ntim & Yue Wu, 2021. "Environmental performance, sustainability, governance and financial performance: Evidence from heavily polluting industries in China," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(5), pages 2313-2331, July.
    8. Alatawi, Ibrahim A. & Ntim, Collins G. & Zras, Anis & Elmagrhi, Mohamed H., 2023. "CSR, financial and non-financial performance in the tourism sector: A systematic literature review and future research agenda," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wsi:tijaxx:v:56:y:2021:i:01:n:s1094406021500013. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Tai Tone Lim (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.worldscientific.com/worldscinet/tija .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.