IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wsi/ijitdm/v16y2017i01ns0219622015500406.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Fuzzy Linguistic Extended LibQUAL+ Model to Assess Service Quality in Academic Libraries

Author

Listed:
  • F. J. Cabrerizo

    (Department of Software Engineering and Computer Systems, Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia (UNED), Madrid 28040, Spain)

  • J. López-Gijón

    (Department of Library Science, University of Granada, Granada 18071, Spain)

  • M. A. Martínez

    (Department of Social Work and Services, University of Granada, Granada 18071, Spain)

  • J. A. Morente-Molinera

    (Department of Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence, University of Granada, Granada 18071, Spain)

  • E. Herrera-Viedma

    (Department of Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence, University of Granada, Granada 18071, Spain5Department of Electrical & Computer Engineering, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah 21589, Saudi Arabia)

Abstract

LibQUAL+ model is the best-known method for the quality evaluation of library services, but it has two major drawbacks. First, to measure the quality, it is devised on a cardinal scale: the service levels range from 1 to 9. However, the standard representation of the concepts used by humans for communication is the natural language and, hence, users should express their judgments by using words instead of numbers. Second, it considers that all users’ opinions are equally important. Nevertheless, users do not play an equal role in assessing the service quality, i.e., the opinion given by some users should be more relevant than the opinion provided by others. To solve these drawbacks, we present an extended LibQUAL+ model representing the users’ perceptions by using a fuzzy linguistic modeling and taking into account that users’ opinions on the library services are not equally important.

Suggested Citation

  • F. J. Cabrerizo & J. López-Gijón & M. A. Martínez & J. A. Morente-Molinera & E. Herrera-Viedma, 2017. "A Fuzzy Linguistic Extended LibQUAL+ Model to Assess Service Quality in Academic Libraries," International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making (IJITDM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 16(01), pages 225-244, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:wsi:ijitdm:v:16:y:2017:i:01:n:s0219622015500406
    DOI: 10.1142/S0219622015500406
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.worldscientific.com/doi/abs/10.1142/S0219622015500406
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1142/S0219622015500406?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. F. J. Cabrerizo & J. López-Gijón & A. A. Ruíz & E. Herrera-Viedma, 2010. "A Model Based On Fuzzy Linguistic Information To Evaluate The Quality Of Digital Libraries," International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making (IJITDM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 9(03), pages 455-472.
    2. Meimei Xia & Zeshui Xu, 2014. "A Novel Method for Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Decision Making," International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making (IJITDM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 13(03), pages 497-519.
    3. Cabrerizo, Francisco Javier & Herrera-Viedma, Enrique & Pedrycz, Witold, 2013. "A method based on PSO and granular computing of linguistic information to solve group decision making problems defined in heterogeneous contexts," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 230(3), pages 624-633.
    4. Han-Saem Park & Moon-Hee Park & Sung-Bae Cho, 2015. "Mobile Information Recommendation Using Multi-Criteria Decision Making with Bayesian Network," International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making (IJITDM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 14(02), pages 317-338.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Osama Khaled Alkhlaifat, 2019. "Exploration of Silence's Motives Towards the Work Decisions: The Case of Jordanian Public and Private Schools," Journal of Public Administration and Governance, Macrothink Institute, vol. 9(1), pages 266-289, March.
    2. Heradio, Rubén & Cabrerizo, Francisco Javier & Fernández-Amorós, David & Herrera, Manuel & Herrera-Viedma, Enrique, 2013. "A fuzzy linguistic model to evaluate the quality of Library 2.0 functionalities," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 33(4), pages 642-654.
    3. Chonghui Zhang & Weihua Su & Sichao Chen & Shouzhen Zeng & Huchang Liao, 2023. "A Combined Weighting Based Large Scale Group Decision Making Framework for MOOC Group Recommendation," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 32(3), pages 537-567, June.
    4. Peláez, José Ignacio & Bernal, Rubén, 2016. "Selective majority additive ordered weighting averaging operatorAuthor-Name: Karanik, Marcelo," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 250(3), pages 816-826.
    5. Yang Zhao & Fan Xu & Xiaomao Fan & Hailiang Wang & Kwok-Leung Tsui & Yurong Guan, 2022. "Prediction of Wellness Condition for Community-Dwelling Elderly via ECG Signals Data-Based Feature Construction and Modeling," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(17), pages 1-16, September.
    6. Juan Bernabé-Moreno & Álvaro Tejeda-Lorente & Carlos Porcel-Gallego & Enrique Herrera-Viedma, 2018. "Leveraging Localized Social Media Insights for Industry Early Warning Systems," International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making (IJITDM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 17(01), pages 357-385, January.
    7. Yucheng Dong & Yao Li & Ying He & Xia Chen, 2021. "Preference–Approval Structures in Group Decision Making: Axiomatic Distance and Aggregation," Decision Analysis, INFORMS, vol. 18(4), pages 273-295, December.
    8. Paulo Cesar Schotten & Leydiana Sousa Pereira & Danielle Costa Morais, 2022. "Credit granting sorting model for financial organizations," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 8(1), pages 1-24, December.
    9. Zhou, Wei & Xu, Zeshui, 2016. "Generalized asymmetric linguistic term set and its application to qualitative decision making involving risk appetites," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 254(2), pages 610-621.
    10. Przybyła-Kasperek, Małgorzata & Wakulicz-Deja, Alicja, 2016. "The strength of coalition in a dispersed decision support system with negotiations," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 252(3), pages 947-968.
    11. Bingsheng Liu & Tengfei Huo & Pinchao Liao & Jie Gong & Bin Xue, 2015. "A Group Decision-Making Aggregation Model for Contractor Selection in Large Scale Construction Projects Based on Two-Stage Partial Least Squares (PLS) Path Modeling," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 24(5), pages 855-883, September.
    12. Xiaoxuan Hu & Yanjun Wang & Haiquan Sun & Peng Jin, 2022. "A remote sensing satellite observation scheme evaluation method based on granular computing of intuitionistic linguistic preference relation," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 316(1), pages 343-364, September.
    13. Virgilio López-Morales, 2018. "A Reliable Method for Consistency Improving of Interval Multiplicative Preference Relations Expressed under Uncertainty," International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making (IJITDM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 17(05), pages 1561-1585, September.
    14. Zhibin Wu & Jiuping Xu & Zeshui Xu, 2016. "A multiple attribute group decision making framework for the evaluation of lean practices at logistics distribution centers," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 247(2), pages 735-757, December.
    15. Svajone Bekesiene & Aidas Vasilis Vasiliauskas & Šárka Hošková-Mayerová & Virgilija Vasilienė-Vasiliauskienė, 2021. "Comprehensive Assessment of Distance Learning Modules by Fuzzy AHP-TOPSIS Method," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-25, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wsi:ijitdm:v:16:y:2017:i:01:n:s0219622015500406. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Tai Tone Lim (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.worldscinet.com/ijitdm/ijitdm.shtml .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.