IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wsi/ijimxx/v06y2002i04ns1363919602000641.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An Investigation Of The Contents And Consequences Of Major Organizational Innovations

Author

Listed:
  • PETER TOTTERDELL

    (Institute of Work Psychology, University of Sheffield, England)

  • DESMOND LEACH

    (Institute of Work Psychology, University of Sheffield, England)

  • KAMAL BIRDI

    (Institute of Work Psychology, University of Sheffield, England)

  • CHRIS CLEGG

    (Institute of Work Psychology, University of Sheffield, England)

  • TOBY WALL

    (Institute of Work Psychology, University of Sheffield, England)

Abstract

To compare the consequences of different types of major organizational innovation and to identify the characteristics of more beneficial innovations, a telephone interview survey of senior managers from 513 UK organizations was conducted. Although 90% of major innovations were reported to have an overall beneficial impact, statistical analyses showed that specific effects on finances, employee relations, customers, and quality of life depended on the type of innovation and its characteristics. The effects of different types of innovation were related but not reducible to their characteristics. The findings suggest that a more differentiated view of the outcomes of innovation is both possible and useful.

Suggested Citation

  • Peter Totterdell & Desmond Leach & Kamal Birdi & Chris Clegg & Toby Wall, 2002. "An Investigation Of The Contents And Consequences Of Major Organizational Innovations," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 6(04), pages 343-368.
    • Handle: RePEc:wsi:ijimxx:v:06:y:2002:i:04:n:s1363919602000641
    DOI: 10.1142/S1363919602000641
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.worldscientific.com/doi/abs/10.1142/S1363919602000641
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1142/S1363919602000641?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Anna Kwiotkowska & Magdalena Gebczynska, 2021. "Causal Pathways of Innovation Orientation, Sustainability, Leadership and Social Performance," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(3), pages 32-54.
    2. Arranz, N. & Arroyabe, M.F. & Li, Jun & de Arroyabe, J.C. Fernandez, 2019. "An integrated model of organisational innovation and firm performance: Generation, persistence and complementarity," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 270-282.
    3. Goldbach, Kristin & Rotaru, Andreea Mihaela & Reichert, Stefan & Stiff, George & Gölz, Sebastian, 2018. "Which digital energy services improve energy efficiency? A multi-criteria investigation with European experts," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 239-248.
    4. Simpson, Penny M. & Siguaw, Judy A. & Enz, Cathy A., 2006. "Innovation orientation outcomes: The good and the bad," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 59(10-11), pages 1133-1141, October.
    5. Donard Games & Ranggi Putri Rendi, 2019. "The effects of knowledge management and risk taking on SME financial performance in creative industries in an emerging market: the mediating effect of innovation outcomes," Journal of Global Entrepreneurship Research, Springer;UNESCO Chair in Entrepreneurship, vol. 9(1), pages 1-14, December.
    6. Erkut Altindag & Cemal Zehir & A. Acar, 2011. "Strategic Orientations and Their Effects on Firm Performance in Turkish Family Owned Firms," Eurasian Business Review, Springer;Eurasia Business and Economics Society, vol. 1(1), pages 18-36, June.
    7. Dimitrios Kafetzopoulos & Evangelos Psomas, 2016. "ORGANISATIONAL LEARNING, NON-TECHNICAL INNOVATION AND CUSTOMER SATISFACTION OF SMEs," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 20(03), pages 1-28, April.
    8. Andreas A. Kouspos & Photis M. Panayides & Dimitris A. Tsouknidis, 2023. "The relationship between technical innovation and financial performance in shipping firms," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 25(4), pages 698-727, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wsi:ijimxx:v:06:y:2002:i:04:n:s1363919602000641. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Tai Tone Lim (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.worldscinet.com/ijim/ijim.shtml .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.