IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/woraff/v185y2022i2p319-330.html

Commentary – Should Washington Have Pressed Kyiv Into A Compromise With Moscow?

Author

Listed:
  • Andreas Umland

Abstract

This article was submitted in late 2021, and became dated after Russia's demonstrative preparation as well as start of an open, large‐scale invasion of Ukraine early 2022. We nevertheless publish this commentary here in order to document the debate about the events leading to the escalation. No adaptations to the original 2021 article were made after the outbreak of high‐intensity war on 24 February 2022. Avoiding a larger military escalation in the Russian–Ukrainian conflict is an important aim. Yet, historical experience suggests that concessions by Ukraine or its Western partners toward Russian revanchist aspirations in the Donbas may not help achieve it. On the contrary, Western softness, and Ukrainian weakness vis‐à‐vis the Kremlin will lead to further confrontation. Si bien evitar una escalada militar mayor es un objetivo importante, la experiencia histórica sugiere que las concesiones de Ucrania o sus socios occidentales hacia las aspiraciones revanchistas rusas en el Donbass pueden no ayudar a lograrlo. Por el contrario, la blandura occidental y la debilidad de Ucrania frente al Kremlin conducirán a una mayor confrontación. 尽管避免更大的军事升级是一项重要目标, 但历史经验暗示, 乌克兰或其西方伙伴在顿巴斯对俄罗斯的复仇野心所作的妥协可能不会实现这一目标。相反, 与克里姆林宫相比, 西方的软弱性和乌克兰的劣势将导致进一步对峙。

Suggested Citation

  • Andreas Umland, 2022. "Commentary – Should Washington Have Pressed Kyiv Into A Compromise With Moscow?," World Affairs, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 185(2), pages 319-330, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:woraff:v:185:y:2022:i:2:p:319-330
    DOI: 10.1177/00438200221084699
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1177/00438200221084699
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/00438200221084699?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Maria Snegovaya, 2020. "Guns to butter: sociotropic concerns and foreign policy preferences in Russia," Post-Soviet Affairs, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(3), pages 268-279, May.
    2. Erik Andermo & Martin Kragh, 2021. "Sanctions and dollar dependency in Russia: resilience, vulnerability, and financial integration," Post-Soviet Affairs, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 37(3), pages 276-301, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Emma R. Norman, 2022. "Note From The Editor:," World Affairs, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 185(2), pages 232-238, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Konrad, Kai A. & Thum, Marcel, 2023. "Elusive effects of export embargoes for fossil energy resources," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 117(C).
    2. Sergei Guriev & Daniel Treisman, 2019. "Informational Autocrats," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 33(4), pages 100-127, Fall.
    3. Jäkel Tim & Borshchevskiy George Alexander, 2021. "Leadership Discourses on Bureaucracy: Continuity over a Century," NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy, Sciendo, vol. 14(2), pages 111-133, December.
    4. Michal Smetana & Michal Onderco, 2023. "From Moscow With a Mushroom Cloud? Russian Public Attitudes to the Use of Nuclear Weapons in a Conflict With NATO," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 67(2-3), pages 183-209, February.
    5. Pandey, Dharen Kumar & Lucey, Brian M. & Kumar, Satish, 2023. "Border disputes, conflicts, war, and financial markets research: A systematic review," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 65(C).
    6. Roberto Lampa, 2022. "Verso la disgregazione del sistema monetario post 1971? I paesi in via di sviluppo e l'impatto delle sanzioni belliche sulla dollar hegemony (Towards the disintegration of post 1971 monetary system? Developing countries and the impact of war sanction," Moneta e Credito, Economia civile, vol. 75(298), pages 149-161.
    7. Pavlo Klimkin & Andreas Umland, 2020. "Geopolitical Implications and Challenges of the Coronavirus Crisis for Ukraine," World Affairs, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 183(3), pages 256-269, September.
    8. Michal Smetana, 2025. "Microfoundations of domestic audience costs in nondemocratic regimes: Experimental evidence from Putin’s Russia," Journal of Peace Research, Peace Research Institute Oslo, vol. 62(2), pages 278-294, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:woraff:v:185:y:2022:i:2:p:319-330. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.